Connecting Tech Pros Worldwide Forums | Help | Site Map

Is this an Invalid option? | db2pd -apinfo

Shree
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
#1: Nov 13 '08
Anybody with similar experience?

Thx U
Shree.

4.spam@mail.ru
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
#2: Nov 13 '08

re: Is this an Invalid option? | db2pd -apinfo


On Nov 13, 9:51*am, Shree <shree...@gmail.comwrote:
Quote:
Anybody with similar experience?
>
Thx U
Shree.
db2pd -db your_db -apinfo
should be valid since v9.1.5 or v9.5.1
Which db2 version and fixpack do you use?

Sincerely,
Mark B.
Shree
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
#3: Nov 13 '08

re: Is this an Invalid option? | db2pd -apinfo


DB21085I Instance "db2inst4" uses "64" bits and DB2 code release
"SQL09050"
with level identifier "03010107".
Informational tokens are "DB2 v9.5.0.0", "s071001", "LINUXAMD6495",
and Fix
Pack "0".
Product is installed at "/opt/ibm/db2/V9.5".
Quote:
>
db2pd -db your_db -apinfo
should be valid since v9.1.5 or v9.5.1
Which db2 version and fixpack do you use?
>
Sincerely,
Mark B.
4.spam@mail.ru
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
#4: Nov 13 '08

re: Is this an Invalid option? | db2pd -apinfo


On Nov 13, 2:26*pm, Shree <shree...@gmail.comwrote:
Quote:
DB21085I *Instance "db2inst4" uses "64" bits and DB2 code release
"SQL09050"
with level identifier "03010107".
Informational tokens are "DB2 v9.5.0.0", "s071001", "LINUXAMD6495",
and Fix
Pack "0".
Product is installed at "/opt/ibm/db2/V9.5".
>
So you have to apply at least FP1 (and it's better - the latest FP2a)
and you will get this option of db2pd.
Shree
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
#5: Nov 15 '08

re: Is this an Invalid option? | db2pd -apinfo


On Nov 13, 7:35*pm, 4.s...@mail.ru wrote:
Quote:
On Nov 13, 2:26*pm, Shree <shree...@gmail.comwrote:
>
Quote:
DB21085I *Instance "db2inst4" uses "64" bits and DB2 code release
"SQL09050"
with level identifier "03010107".
Informational tokens are "DB2 v9.5.0.0", "s071001", "LINUXAMD6495",
and Fix
Pack "0".
Product is installed at "/opt/ibm/db2/V9.5".
>
So you have to apply at least FP1 (and it's better - the latest FP2a)
and you will get this option of db2pd.
Performance of the WAS/DB was not upto the expectations. We have been
experiencing some out of the body performance degradation when we
applied FP1..did not try FP2, so far. Anybody with similar
experiences?????

Regards,
Shree.
swami
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
#6: Nov 16 '08

re: Is this an Invalid option? | db2pd -apinfo



Hi Shree,

apinfo works only if u are connected to the database.
so try this

db2 "connect to db"
db2 -apinfo -db dbname

thx
Sivaswami Jeganathan
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Nov 15, 3:55*am, Shree <shree...@gmail.comwrote:
Quote:
On Nov 13, 7:35*pm, 4.s...@mail.ru wrote:
>
Quote:
On Nov 13, 2:26*pm, Shree <shree...@gmail.comwrote:
>
Quote:
Quote:
DB21085I *Instance "db2inst4" uses "64" bits and DB2 code release
"SQL09050"
with level identifier "03010107".
Informational tokens are "DB2 v9.5.0.0", "s071001", "LINUXAMD6495",
and Fix
Pack "0".
Product is installed at "/opt/ibm/db2/V9.5".
>
Quote:
So you have to apply at least FP1 (and it's better - the latest FP2a)
and you will get this option of db2pd.
>
Performance of the WAS/DB was not upto the expectations. We have been
experiencing some out of the body performance degradation when we
applied FP1..did not try FP2, so far. Anybody with similar
experiences?????
>
Regards,
Shree.
Closed Thread