Re: Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days)

#1 August 30th, 2008, 08:35 PM

On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 20:07:23 +0100, CLC stats wrote:

Quote:

================================================== ==========================
Top 20 responders by original text (at least 5 posts)
================================================== ==========================
[...]
17: rlb@hoekstra-uitgeverij.nl (Richard Bos)....................... : 41.99%
18: mdh <mdeh@comcast.net>................................ ......... : 40.62%
19: Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk>.......................... . : 39.62%
20: Harald van =?UTF-8?b?RMSzaw==?= <truedfx@gmail.com>............ : 38.94%
>
================================================== ==========================
Bottom 20 responders by original text (at least 5 posts)
================================================== ==========================
[...]
17: Harald van =?UTF-8?b?RMSzaw==?= <truedfx@gmail.com>............ : 38.94%
18: Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk>.......................... . : 39.62%
19: mdh <mdeh@comcast.net>................................ ......... : 40.62%
20: rlb@hoekstra-uitgeverij.nl (Richard Bos)....................... : 41.99%

When there are less than 40 responders with at least 5 posts, it probably is
not particularly useful to separate these into two lists of 20. :-)

#2 September 1st, 2008, 08:25 AM

Harald van =?UTF-8?b?RMSzaw==?= <truedfx@gmail.comwrote:

Quote:

On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 20:07:23 +0100, CLC stats wrote:

Quote:

When there are less than 40 responders with at least 5 posts, it probably is
not particularly useful to separate these into two lists of 20. :-)

The whole stat exercise is not particularly useful, but that has never
stopped the anonymous stats poster.

Richard

Re: Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days)

re: Re: Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days)

/bytes/development

/bytes/it

/bytes/about