Both function width() and manipulator setw() set field width for _next_ output operation.
width() seems to be less handy because we should split a chain of <<.
Is there any situation in which width() is more preferable?
====== C++ code : File foo.cpp : BEGIN ======
#include <iostream>
#include <iomanip>
using namespace std;
int main ()
{
double f = 1.234;
cout.setf(ios::fixed, ios::floatfield);
cout.precision(2);
cout << f << endl
<< setw(7)
<< f << endl
<< f << endl;
cout << endl;
cout << f << endl;
cout.width (7);
cout << f << endl
<< f << endl;
return 0;
}
====== C++ code : File foo.cpp : END ========
====== Compilation & Run : BEGIN ======
$ g++ -v
[---omitted---]
gcc version 3.3.1 (cygming special)
$ g++ -W -Wall foo.cpp
$ a
1.23
1.23
1.23
1.23
1.23
1.23
====== Compilation & Run : END ========
--
=====================================
Alex Vinokur
mailto:alexvn@connect.to
http://mathforum.org/library/view/10978.html news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.c++.perfometer
=====================================
