Johannes Meyer wrote:
Quote:
Quote:
>immaterial that you happen to know your binary came from C++ source
>code.
>
to be more specific:
>
there are only remaining fragments of the source-code.
Some parts are missing and compiling again run into errors.
>
I know the programmer by myself, I sat behind him some time while he
was programming.
I'm quite sure it is C++.
>
What I want to say with "The source code is lost" is, that there is no
way for a resolution by changing the source code because some parts of
the source code are lost. And the programmer is lost to. I tried to
find him for five years now.
>
As long as I don't know which part causes this error I think it is
useless to post any lines of the code.
You're absolutely correct. It's useless to post fragments if you are
unable to resurrect the entire program from them. But please understand
this too: it's useless to discuss any behaviour of your program *without*
the code. It's also useless to post questions about Windows XP SP2 here.
They are simply off-topic. It seems you have no solution... But, wait!
You have a solution: get somebody to write the program again for you. If
your program works somewhere (like Windows 2K or NT) you could try to
find a willing and able programmer who might want (for some compensation)
to [re]create the program by looking at the working executable and at the
remains of the source code. It's called "reverse engineering" or "work
from a prototype". You're strongly advised to work out P&L statement
before embarking in that direction. Reverse engineering is costly.
Good luck!
V
--
Please remove capital 'A's when replying by e-mail
I do not respond to top-posted replies, please don't ask