473,289 Members | 1,840 Online
Bytes | Software Development & Data Engineering Community
Post Job

Home Posts Topics Members FAQ

Join Bytes to post your question to a community of 473,289 software developers and data experts.

const volatile???

In the post below, 'copy constructor?', the answers refer to
an object declared as const volatile. Now I'm confused.
Are those terms not mutually exclusive?

const='Hey compiler! This is not going to change so generate
your code based on that assumption.'

volatile='Hey compiler! This is going to change so generate
your code based on that assumption.'

Or am I out to lunch on my understanding of these two words?

Drew
May 17 '06 #1
9 5792
d.f.s. wrote:
In the post below, 'copy constructor?', the answers refer to
an object declared as const volatile. Now I'm confused.
Are those terms not mutually exclusive?
Definitely not.
const='Hey compiler! This is not going to change so generate
your code based on that assumption.'
No, that's not all. OOH, it could be "hey, it's not going to change",
OTOH it could just as well be "*you* are not [allowed] to change it".
volatile='Hey compiler! This is going to change so generate
your code based on that assumption.'

Or am I out to lunch on my understanding of these two words?


Not completely, but you're making wrong assumptions and conclusions.

V
--
Please remove capital 'A's when replying by e-mail
I do not respond to top-posted replies, please don't ask
May 17 '06 #2
[snip]
const='Hey compiler! This is not going to change so generate
your code based on that assumption.'


No, that's not all. OOH, it could be "hey, it's not going to change",
OTOH it could just as well be "*you* are not [allowed] to change it".


Right. It is a promise the coder makes , which the compiler will
enforce upon anyone who writes code to handle the object. It
protects the object & -used to be- helps the compiler to optimize
its' output. I think that I've got that one.
volatile='Hey compiler! This is going to change so generate
your code based on that assumption.'

My understanding of 'volatile':
A key word which indicates that an object is likely to be
or WILL be modified. Redundant for objects not
declared const. Was used to help older compilers to
do optimization. Sort of like 'register', it is seldom used
or needed with modern compilers.

I assume that my understanding of 'volatile' is wrong.

Drew
May 17 '06 #3
d.f.s. <no**@none.nit> wrote:
My understanding of 'volatile':
A key word which indicates that an object is likely to be
or WILL be modified. Redundant for objects not
declared const. Was used to help older compilers to
do optimization. Sort of like 'register', it is seldom used
or needed with modern compilers.

I assume that my understanding of 'volatile' is wrong.


Here's an article by Andrei Alexandrescu on the 'volatile' keyword:

volatile - Multithreaded Programmer's Best Friend
http://www.ddj.com/showArticle.jhtml...leID=184403766

--
Marcus Kwok
Replace 'invalid' with 'net' to reply
May 17 '06 #4
d.f.s. wrote:
[..]
My understanding of 'volatile':
A key word which indicates that an object is likely to be
or WILL be modified. Redundant for objects not
declared const.
No, it's not.
Was used to help older compilers to
do optimization. Sort of like 'register', it is seldom used
or needed with modern compilers.

I assume that my understanding of 'volatile' is wrong.


Yes, but not entirely. 'volatile' indicates an object that can change
by means other than the program in which it appears. It could be some
address that a device (through a driver or DMA means) can update based
on a change of its state (serial port receives another input, etc.)

Declaring a variable 'volatile' makes the compiler generate code that
reads the value from the variable's storage any time it's needed in
an expression, precluding the compiler from caching the value or some
other optimization WRT the variable's value.

V
--
Please remove capital 'A's when replying by e-mail
I do not respond to top-posted replies, please don't ask
May 17 '06 #5
> My understanding of 'volatile':
A key word which indicates that an object is likely to be
or WILL be modified. Redundant for objects not
declared const. Was used to help older compilers to
do optimization. Sort of like 'register', it is seldom used
or needed with modern compilers. I assume that my understanding of 'volatile' is wrong.


You understood correctly (as in, it's wrong). 'volatile' isn't simple a
cute way of saying "not const". It informs the compiler that it
shouldn't expect to know whether the variable changes or not based on
what it compiles. This is used when you make a variable point to an
area of memory for example. In practice, this means that the program
has to recheck the variable every time it's used rather than apply some
sly optimization because it sees you yourself didn't change it in the
code.

May 17 '06 #6
Ok. So a good example would be:
const volatile clock;

const in that YOU are not allowed to change it.
volatile in that it will change so look at it whenever
CheckTime() is called.

If right, thank you all

Drew
May 17 '06 #7
d.f.s. wrote:
Ok. So a good example would be:
const volatile clock;

const in that YOU are not allowed to change it.
volatile in that it will change so look at it whenever
CheckTime() is called.


Exactly.

const is "This code is not allowed to modify this variable.
volatile is "This variable may change due to forces unrelated to this code".

Example:

const volatile unsigned long * const MEMORY_MAPPED_REG =
reinterpret_cast<const volatile unsigned long *>(0xFFE00000L);

MEMORY_MAPPED_REG is a read only h/w register at FFE00000. It
can't be written to, but may change due to external issues.
May 17 '06 #8
Victor Bazarov wrote:
d.f.s. wrote:
[..]
My understanding of 'volatile':
A key word which indicates that an object is likely to be
or WILL be modified. Redundant for objects not
declared const.
No, it's not.
Was used to help older compilers to
do optimization. Sort of like 'register', it is seldom used
or needed with modern compilers.

I assume that my understanding of 'volatile' is wrong.


Yes, but not entirely. 'volatile' indicates an object that can change
by means other than the program in which it appears.


Or that it may be read by something else than that program.
It could be some address that a device (through a driver or DMA means) can
update based on a change of its state (serial port receives another input,
etc.)

Declaring a variable 'volatile' makes the compiler generate code that
reads the value from the variable's storage any time it's needed in
an expression,
And also writing it.
precluding the compiler from caching the value or some other optimization
WRT the variable's value.


volatile is quite commonly used in low-level code that communicates directly
with memory-mapped hardware registers or when transfering data into/out of
an interrupt routine. In this case, it's important that any read and write
operation is guaranteed to be actually performed. It boils down to: "The
as-if rule is not enough."

May 17 '06 #9
red floyd wrote:
Example:

const volatile unsigned long * const MEMORY_MAPPED_REG =
reinterpret_cast<constÂ*volatileÂ*unsignedÂ*longÂ* *>(0xFFE00000L);

MEMORY_MAPPED_REG is a read only h/w register at FFE00000.Â*Â*It
can't be written to, but may change due to external issues.


The canonical example here is the system clock...

--
Phlip
http://www.greencheese.us/ZeekLand <-- NOT a blog!!!
May 17 '06 #10

This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion.

Similar topics

17
by: cheeser | last post by:
Hello all, Please see the question in the code below... Thanks! Dave #include <iostream>
2
by: coolrama | last post by:
what does this declaration mean const * volatile * Is it valid. Is it used somewhere? Thanks Rama
16
by: herbertF | last post by:
Hi guys, In a program (not my own) I encountered the declaration of a constant pointer to an array consisting of two other const pointers to arrays. Not quite sure why they do it so complicated,...
1
by: Mantorok Redgormor | last post by:
strictly speaking we can't say that const means "read only" but instead that it means "do not modify me please" since an object can be both modifiable and not modifiable or volatile and const,...
9
by: Skybuck Flying | last post by:
Hello, What does Const mean in this c structure ? and what is the delphi equivalent ? I think const struct just means it can't be modified... is that correct ? Struct { Type1 Field1;...
2
by: FT | last post by:
Hi all: In the standuard 9.3.2, it says: >The type of /this/ in a member function of a class X is X*. If the member >function is declared const, the type of /this/ is const X*, if the member...
7
by: nospam | last post by:
Hi all, I have this struct typedef: typedef struct { int * test; }testst; and have this declaration:
4
by: Olaf | last post by:
Hi, is there a way to declare an array with const variables like: static const ushort RX_BUF_SIZE = 0x100; typedef struct { volatile ushort buf; volatile unsigned head; volatile unsigned...
29
by: Rohit kumar Chandel | last post by:
Hi all, I have a doubt in const keyword. My understanding says that a variable declared const can not be modified by the module it is defined in. Then consider the following code segment:...
0
by: DolphinDB | last post by:
The formulas of 101 quantitative trading alphas used by WorldQuant were presented in the paper 101 Formulaic Alphas. However, some formulas are complex, leading to challenges in calculation. Take...
0
by: DolphinDB | last post by:
Tired of spending countless mintues downsampling your data? Look no further! In this article, you’ll learn how to efficiently downsample 6.48 billion high-frequency records to 61 million...
0
by: Aftab Ahmad | last post by:
Hello Experts! I have written a code in MS Access for a cmd called "WhatsApp Message" to open WhatsApp using that very code but the problem is that it gives a popup message everytime I clicked on...
0
by: Aftab Ahmad | last post by:
So, I have written a code for a cmd called "Send WhatsApp Message" to open and send WhatsApp messaage. The code is given below. Dim IE As Object Set IE =...
0
by: ryjfgjl | last post by:
ExcelToDatabase: batch import excel into database automatically...
0
isladogs
by: isladogs | last post by:
The next Access Europe meeting will be on Wednesday 6 Mar 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC) and finishing at about 19:15 (7.15PM). In this month's session, we are pleased to welcome back...
1
isladogs
by: isladogs | last post by:
The next Access Europe meeting will be on Wednesday 6 Mar 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC) and finishing at about 19:15 (7.15PM). In this month's session, we are pleased to welcome back...
0
by: Vimpel783 | last post by:
Hello! Guys, I found this code on the Internet, but I need to modify it a little. It works well, the problem is this: Data is sent from only one cell, in this case B5, but it is necessary that data...
0
by: ArrayDB | last post by:
The error message I've encountered is; ERROR:root:Error generating model response: exception: access violation writing 0x0000000000005140, which seems to be indicative of an access violation...

By using Bytes.com and it's services, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

To disable or enable advertisements and analytics tracking please visit the manage ads & tracking page.