Stdout to UDP socket in inetd

[Obi-Wan]

I'm trying to write a daemon in C that runs under (x)inetd that
communicates over UDP. I'm trying to write a simple DNS server that
returns the same IP for every query it receives. Things work just
fine reading the request, but when I try to write(2) the response, it
returns -1 with errno 89: "Destination address required". This seems
to indicate the wrong setting on a socket. Here's my xinetd config
paragraph:

------------------------- Achilles tendon - cut here -------------------------
service domain
{
port = 53
protocol = udp
socket_type = dgram
wait = yes
only_from = 127.0.0.1
user = root
server = /usr/local/sbin/dns
log_on_failure += USERID
disable = no
}
------------------------- Achilles tendon - cut here -------------------------

The write that's failing is the first one I'm calling, and it takes
place less than a second after the request comes in. I verified this
with the following program:

------------------------- Achilles tendon - cut here -------------------------
main() {
int err;
char *buf = "hello";

openlog("dns", LOG_PID, LOG_DAEMON);
if ((err = write(1, buf, 1)) != 1)
syslog(LOG_ERR, "write returned %d: errno %d: %s",
err, errno, strerror(errno));
closelog();
return 0;
}
------------------------- Achilles tendon - cut here -------------------------

If I run that from the command line, it prints an "h". From xinetd,
it logs:
write returned -1: errno 89: Destination address required

What am I doing wrong?

I suppose I could rewrite this thing to act as a standalone daemon,
but that's more work & a lot of refresher reading on socket programming.

If it matters, this is CentOS (RedHat) linux with a 2.4 kernel.

--
Ben "Obi-Wan" Hollingsworth ob****@jedi.com
The stuff of earth competes for the allegiance I owe only to the
Giver of all good things, so if I stand, let me stand on the
promise that You will pull me through. -- Rich Mullins

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

[Maxim Yegorushkin]

Obi-Wan wrote:

I'm trying to write a daemon in C that runs under (x)inetd that
communicates over UDP. I'm trying to write a simple DNS server that
returns the same IP for every query it receives. Things work just
fine reading the request, but when I try to write(2) the response, it
returns -1 with errno 89: "Destination address required". This seems
to indicate the wrong setting on a socket.

To be able to call write() on a UDP socket you first need to set the
default destination address by calling connect() on the socket. I don't
know if xinetd can does that for you.

[James Carlson]

Obi-Wan <bv*@tatooine.jedi.com> writes:

I'm trying to write a daemon in C that runs under (x)inetd that
communicates over UDP. I'm trying to write a simple DNS server that
returns the same IP for every query it receives. Things work just
fine reading the request, but when I try to write(2) the response, it
returns -1 with errno 89: "Destination address required". This seems
to indicate the wrong setting on a socket. Here's my xinetd config
paragraph:

That's not going to work. As a UDP wait-type service, you're given
the actual socket that the inetd process has.

In other words, you should be doing something like this:

char buffer[1024];
struct sockaddr_in from;
int fromlen, retv;

for (;;) {
/* Kill myself if I've been idle for a while */
alarm(10);
fromlen = sizeof (from);
retv = recvfrom(0, buffer, sizeof (buffer), 0, &from,
&fromlen);
... do something ...
sendto(1, replymsg, replylen, 0, &from, fromlen);
}

I think there are some useful examples of this in the Stevens
networking books.

--
James Carlson, KISS Network <ja*************@sun.com>
Sun Microsystems / 1 Network Drive 71.232W Vox [phone]
MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax [phone]

[Keith Thompson]

Obi-Wan <bv*@tatooine.jedi.com> writes:

I'm trying to write a daemon in C that runs under (x)inetd that
communicates over UDP.

[...]

Standard C does not provide any form of networking. Please drop
comp.lang.c from the newsgroups line if you post a followup. Thanks.

--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) ks***@mib.org <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
San Diego Supercomputer Center <*> <http://users.sdsc.edu/~kst>
We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this.