IDE C++

Hello,

I am looking for Visual C++ .NET 2002. As far as I remember there is was
free to download for personal use. Is this correct? On the website
microsoft.com I can find a 2005 beta 2 to download, but that is not what I
want.
Sorry, if I am in the wrong group, the microsoft.public.it.dotnet.vc++ is
unpopulated.

Bye Chris

re: IDE C++

Kerl Mitte 30 wrote:[color=blue]
> I am looking for Visual C++ .NET 2002. As far as I remember there is was
> free to download for personal use. Is this correct?[/color]

Not the IDE, no. There is what is known as "Microsoft Visual C++ Toolkit
2003", and it only has the compiler/libraries, no IDE. Yet, I strongly
recommend getting it. VC++ .NET 2003 (7.1) is a decent compiler, good
optimizer, and significantly better than 2002.
[color=blue]
> On the website
> microsoft.com I can find a 2005 beta 2 to download, but that is not what I
> want.
> Sorry, if I am in the wrong group, the microsoft.public.it.dotnet.vc++ is
> unpopulated.[/color]

Try 'microsoft.public.vc.*' hierarchy.

V

re: IDE C++

Victor Bazarov wrote:[color=blue]
> Kerl Mitte 30 wrote:[color=green]
> > I am looking for Visual C++ .NET 2002. As far as I remember there is was
> > free to download for personal use. Is this correct?[/color]
>
> Not the IDE, no. There is what is known as "Microsoft Visual C++ Toolkit
> 2003", and it only has the compiler/libraries, no IDE. Yet, I strongly
> recommend getting it. VC++ .NET 2003 (7.1) is a decent compiler, good
> optimizer, and significantly better than 2002.
>[color=green]
> > On the website
> > microsoft.com I can find a 2005 beta 2 to download, but that is not what I
> > want.
> > Sorry, if I am in the wrong group, the microsoft.public.it.dotnet.vc++ is
> > unpopulated.[/color]
>
> Try 'microsoft.public.vc.*' hierarchy.
>
> V[/color]

I googled for "Microsoft Visual C++ Toolkit 2003" and found it at
http://msdn.microsoft.com/visualc/vctoolkit2003/

Cheers! --M

re: IDE C++

"Kerl Mitte 30" <kerlmitte30@arcor.de> writes:
[color=blue]
> I am looking for Visual C++ .NET 2002. As far as I remember there is was
> free to download for personal use. Is this correct?[/color]

No. The command-line tools and SDK were, and still are, as far as I know,
freely downloadable. But the IDE wasn't.

sherm--

--
Cocoa programming in Perl: http://camelbones.sourceforge.net
Hire me! My resume: http://www.dot-app.org

re: IDE C++

mlimber wrote:[color=blue]
> Victor Bazarov wrote:
>[color=green]
>>Kerl Mitte 30 wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>>>I am looking for Visual C++ .NET 2002. As far as I remember there is was
>>>free to download for personal use. Is this correct?[/color]
>>
>>Not the IDE, no. There is what is known as "Microsoft Visual C++ Toolkit
>>2003", and it only has the compiler/libraries, no IDE. Yet, I strongly
>>recommend getting it. VC++ .NET 2003 (7.1) is a decent compiler, good
>>optimizer, and significantly better than 2002.
>>[color=darkred]
>> > On the website[/color]
>>[color=darkred]
>>>microsoft.com I can find a 2005 beta 2 to download, but that is not what I
>>>want.
>>>Sorry, if I am in the wrong group, the microsoft.public.it.dotnet.vc++ is
>>>unpopulated.[/color]
>>
>>Try 'microsoft.public.vc.*' hierarchy.
>>
>>V[/color]
>
>
> I googled for "Microsoft Visual C++ Toolkit 2003" and found it at
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/visualc/vctoolkit2003/[/color]

You can use TheIDE of U++ as the IDE for Visual C++ Toolkit

http://upp.sf.net.

It contains fairly good debugger as well.

Mirek

re: IDE C++

Sherm Pendley wrote:[color=blue]
> "Kerl Mitte 30" <kerlmitte30@arcor.de> writes:
>
>[color=green]
>>I am looking for Visual C++ .NET 2002. As far as I remember there is was
>>free to download for personal use. Is this correct?[/color]
>
>
> No. The command-line tools and SDK were, and still are, as far as I know,
> freely downloadable. But the IDE wasn't.
>
> sherm--
>[/color]

looks like they had a "comunity edition" called visial c express or
something like..

re: IDE C++

Hello,
Thank all responders. I am downloading it. Still some hours remaining...
Chris

"Kerl Mitte 30" <kerlmitte30@arcor.de> wrote in message
news:434a6c4f$0$16480$9b4e6d93@newsread4.arcor-online.net...[color=blue]
> Hello,
>
> I am looking for Visual C++ .NET 2002. As far as I remember there is was
> free to download for personal use. Is this correct? On the website
> microsoft.com I can find a 2005 beta 2 to download, but that is not what I
> want.
> Sorry, if I am in the wrong group, the microsoft.public.it.dotnet.vc++ is
> unpopulated.
>
> Bye Chris
>[/color]