32 bit c++ complier

can anyone suggest some 32bit C++ compilers for both windows and linux
and a good ide for c++


Rohit

re: 32 bit c++ complier

Rohit wrote:[color=blue]
> can anyone suggest some 32bit C++ compilers for both windows and linux
> and a good ide for c++[/color]

As Compiler: g++
On Linux directly avialable with the gcc package, on Windows through
mingw (http://www.mingw.org) of cygwin (http://www.cygwin.com)

As IDE:
I could recommend eclipse (http://www.eclipse.org) with cdt-plugin
(http://www.eclipse.org/cdt/). Or as Linuxuser i could also recommend
one of vi or (x)emacs with additional plugins. Both are available for
windows too.

Manfred

re: 32 bit c++ complier

Rohit wrote:
[color=blue]
> can anyone suggest some 32bit C++ compilers for both windows and linux
> and a good ide for c++
>
>
> Rohit[/color]
A good IDE on linux would be www.kdevelop.org too!

re: 32 bit c++ complier

Manfred wrote:[color=blue]
> As IDE:
> I could recommend eclipse (http://www.eclipse.org) with cdt-plugin
> (http://www.eclipse.org/cdt/).[/color]

Have you tried Eclipse/CDT? On which platform (Win, Unix, ...)?. Is CDT
really usable?

re: 32 bit c++ complier

Rapscallion wrote:[color=blue]
> Manfred wrote:
>[color=green]
>>As IDE:
>>I could recommend eclipse (http://www.eclipse.org) with cdt-plugin
>>(http://www.eclipse.org/cdt/).[/color]
>
>
> Have you tried Eclipse/CDT? On which platform (Win, Unix, ...)?. Is CDT
> really usable?
>[/color]

I did, and I didn't like it. Eclipse is slow, and CDT didn't work well
either. Try Anjuta instead.

--
Matthias Kaeppler

re: 32 bit c++ complier

> Have you tried Eclipse/CDT? On which platform (Win, Unix, ...)?. Is CDT[color=blue]
> really usable?[/color]

I have used eclipse/cdt on Linux, my friend on Windows. The newest
version is quit good. But i must say that eclipse is using a lot of
memory and harddisk (including the Java-Runtime you need to execute
eclipse).

On Windows many people use VisualStudio from Microsoft, but this costs a
lot of money if you have to buy it regular.

The 'Problem' with Anjuta/ Kdevelop is that they either need gnome or
kde. It is not a problem for most people but i don't like having gnome/
kde on my linux (this is a personal preference, not inteded to start a
flame war ;) ).
So as an emacs user (also personal preference) i'd advise you to use
emacs, but this isn't what most people want :) .

Manfred

re: 32 bit c++ complier

Manfred wrote:[color=blue][color=green]
>>Have you tried Eclipse/CDT? On which platform (Win, Unix, ...)?. Is CDT
>>really usable?[/color]
>
>
> I have used eclipse/cdt on Linux, my friend on Windows. The newest
> version is quit good. But i must say that eclipse is using a lot of
> memory and harddisk (including the Java-Runtime you need to execute
> eclipse).
>
> On Windows many people use VisualStudio from Microsoft, but this costs a
> lot of money if you have to buy it regular.
>
> The 'Problem' with Anjuta/ Kdevelop is that they either need gnome or
> kde. It is not a problem for most people but i don't like having gnome/
> kde on my linux (this is a personal preference, not inteded to start a
> flame war ;) ).
> So as an emacs user (also personal preference) i'd advise you to use
> emacs, but this isn't what most people want :) .
>
> Manfred[/color]

I also use Emacs :)
But it's not an IDE, it doesn't come with companion tools or so, it's
just a very convenient and efficient source code editor (once you get
used to its strange keyboard hooks).

I also liked Kate, but it's also just an editor.

--
Matthias Kaeppler

re: 32 bit c++ complier

Manfred wrote:[color=blue][color=green]
> > Have you tried Eclipse/CDT? On which platform (Win, Unix, ...)?. Is CDT
> > really usable?[/color]
>
> I have used eclipse/cdt on Linux, my friend on Windows. The newest
> version is quit good. But i must say that eclipse is using a lot of
> memory and harddisk (including the Java-Runtime you need to execute
> eclipse).
>
> On Windows many people use VisualStudio from Microsoft, but this costs a
> lot of money if you have to buy it regular.[/color]

This might be interesting:
http://www-128.ibm.com/developerwork...lipsevs-i.html