"Steven T. Hatton" <susudata@setidava.kushan.aa> wrote[color=blue]
> Claudio Puviani wrote:
>[color=green]
> > "SK" <sk_ind12@rediffmail.com> wrote[color=darkred]
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I want to buy _print_ copy of the C++ standard.
> >> I have tried contacting
info@ihs.com but got no replies.
> >> Any pointers will be appreciated.[/color]
> >
> >[/color]
>[/color]
http://search.barnesandnoble.com/boo...sbn=0470846747[color=blue]
>
> Wow! That beats $175.00 US! I noticed _C++ Pocket Reference_ listed on the
> page describing the Standard:
>
http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/cplus...tml?CMP=IL7015
> I have the XML counterpart, and often refer to it. Unfortunately this C++
> Pocket Reference is almost certainly for the older version of the
> C++.Standard.[/color]
It's very recent, including corrigenda.
[color=blue]
> I wonder if it would be good to have around.[/color]
It's a lot more portable. The standard itself is fairly hefty and quite a
few trees sacrificed their lives to its printing.
[color=blue]
> The Standard itself is not ideal for easy reference, unless, perhaps, if[/color]
you[color=blue]
> have already read it carefully, and understand it well.[/color]
The pocket reference is more user-friendly, if less rigorous.
Claudio Puviani
