I concur.
There's a handy list of differences between them at :
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/vstudio/aa700921.aspx
Here's what VWD doesn't support :
Source Control
Local database development only ( can't modify db's remotely from the IDE )
No Class Designer
No Object Test Bench
No Crystal Reports ( you must use SQL Reporting Services )
No remote debugging ( local only )
No 64-bit Compiler Support
No Server Explorer ( servers node )
No Code profiling
No Static analysis analysis
No Unit testing
No Code coverage
No Project Management
No Test case management
No support for command-line Class Library ( must compile manually )
No development for Office programs
Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
asp.net faq :
http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en espaņol :
http://asp.net.do/foros/
======================================
"Mark Fitzpatrick" <markfitz@fitzme.comwrote in message news:ufBq00a9HHA.5424@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
Quote:
>I think you're confusing the products here. Visual Web Developer IS the web design portion of Visual Studio. Visual
>Studio includes a number of components, Visual C#, Visual C++, Visual Web Developer. Sometimes you'll see references to
>Visual Web Developer Express which is the free version of Visual Web Developer and lacks some of the more advanced
>features, but essentially Visual Web Developer is simply the web development portion of Visual Studio.
>
>
--
Hope this helps,
Mark Fitzpatrick
Microsoft MVP - FrontPage
>
"Kevin" <aa@as.comwrote in message news:%23EVKufa9HHA.5424@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
Quote:
>Hi!
>The Visual Web Developer is better than Visual Studio 2005 for web development? All the Ajax examples are developed
>in Visual Web Developer.
>>
>Thanks
>>
>
>