but who runs the service??? right?
--
Bruno Alexandre
(a Portuguese in Københanv, Danmark)
"Altman" <baltman@easy-automation.com> escreveu na mensagem
news:1150903008.938997.297850@g10g2000cwb.googlegr oups.com...
still, you need SQL 2005 Server w/Report Service licenced in a server
machine to run it.
To me it doesn't look like you do, as I stated in the previous message
As quoted from
http://www.gotreportviewer.com/
# Q: Is a SQL Server license required to use the ReportViewer control?
A: No. The ReportViewer control is freely redistributable. It can work
independently of SQL Server ('local mode') and a SQL Server license is
not required. In remote mode the ReportViewer control talks to a Report
Server. The Report Server does require a SQL Server license.
I have not seen anywhere stating that you must have SQL server but I
have seen almost everywhere saying that you do not need SQL server.
Yes you would need it if you use RDL, but I will be using RDLC.
Bruno Alexandre wrote:[color=blue]
> still, you need SQL 2005 Server w/Report Service licenced in a server
> machine to run it.
>
> can't use the free MSDE :-(
>
> --
>
> Bruno Alexandre
> (a Portuguese in Københanv, Danmark)
>
>
> "Altman" <baltman@easy-automation.com> escreveu na mensagem
> news:1150899101.546418.227050@i40g2000cwc.googlegr oups.com...
> I know I read somewhere that Crystal can be used for up to a couple
> users concurrently for web server purposes. Once you get past that
> then you need to get Crystal Report Server. All of the documentation I
> have read on RDLC and the reportviewer says nothing about having to get
> a license for that.
> As quoted from
http://www.gotreportviewer.com/
>
> # Q: Is a SQL Server license required to use the ReportViewer control?
>
> A: No. The ReportViewer control is freely redistributable. It can work
> independently of SQL Server ('local mode') and a SQL Server license is
> not required. In remote mode the ReportViewer control talks to a Report
> Server. The Report Server does require a SQL Server license.
>
>
>
> Bruno Alexandre wrote:[color=green]
> > the answer it's easy for the CR part.
> >
> > Microsoft Visual Studio 2005 have the component for Crystal Reports
> > under
> > ASP.NET, but this license is only for developer proposes, to have it
> > under
> > a
> > publishing server you need to buy a new license and as you can see under
> > CR
> > website, does not have any limitation like the Developer license in the
> > VS2k5.
> >
> > SQL Report Services is the same deal... under VS is only for
> > developing...
> >
> > Read more:
> >
http://www.businessobjects.com/produ...ng.asp#webapps
> >
> > --
> >
> > Bruno Alexandre
> > (a Portuguese in Københanv, Danmark)
> >
> >
> > "Altman" <baltman@easy-automation.com> escreveu na mensagem
> > news:1150896253.438059.324730@g10g2000cwb.googlegr oups.com...[color=darkred]
> > >I am currently using ASP.Net 2003 and will be upgrading to 2005
> > > sometime in the near future. I have been having issues with using
> > > Crystal Reports that were included with .Net to handle my reporting
> > > needs. I was wondering if anybody has an opinion on how the new
> > > reportViewer control works in comparison to Crystal. One of the main
> > > problems I have been having with Crystal Reports is that they seem to
> > > load very slow no matter how small the report is and no matter how
> > > fast
> > > the server is. I also have been having a problem (and I think this is
> > > a Crystal bug) with creating the report to work with lets say the pubs
> > > database. Then when I transfer to a different machine and want to use
> > > a different database name pubsTest, the report fails. The application
> > > that we are writing will have about 50 -100 people using it (not all
> > > at
> > > once). One of my concerns with crystal was that I believe it has a
> > > limit on how many people can run reports. Is this the case with RDLC?
> > > Are RDLC faster? More reliable? Easy to use?
> > >[/color][/color][/color]
