odd performance question - xml parsing

Hi...

We've been doing some basic performance testing comparing asp, asp.net,
mono, and php. One of the basic tests is on simply parsing an xml document
and streaming the result back to the client.

I never would have thought of it, but someone in our group had heard that
using XmlDocument.Load (Server.MapPath (file));
was slower than actually creating the stream, the XmlTextReader, and passing
the reader to the XmlDocument.Load();.

I've tried it, and darn if he wasn't right.

System.Xml.XmlDocument DOMObj = new System.Xml.XmlDocument();
System.IO.StreamReader stream = new System.IO.StreamReader
(Server.MapPath("file.xml"));
System.Xml.XmlTextReader reader = new System.Xml.XmlTextReader(stream);
reader.WhitespaceHandling = System.Xml.WhitespaceHandling.None;
DOMObj.Load(reader);

was 5% faster than

System.Xml.XmlDocument DOMObj = new System.Xml.XmlDocument();
System.Xml.XmlTextReader reader = new
System.Xml.XmlTextReader(Server.MapPath ("file.xml"));
reader.WhitespaceHandling = System.Xml.WhitespaceHandling.None;
DOMObj.Load(reader);

which was 20% faster than
System.Xml.XmlDocument DOMObj = new System.Xml.XmlDocument();
DOMObj.PreserveWhitespace = true;
DOMObj.Load(Server.MapPath("file.xml"));

I can't think of any reason why it's so much faster to manually create your
own stream and XmlTextReader rather than letting XmlDocument figure out the
fastest way to process the document.

Any ideas?

Thanks
_mark

re: odd performance question - xml parsing

doc.load(filename) - creates a validating xml reader, which is why its so
slow

new XmlTextReader(filename) - expects a uri, not a filename. if no protocol
is specified, then its converted to a file based uri (file://filename), then
opened as a uri resource. this transalation requires serveral directory
lookups.

new XmlTextReader(reader) - just read the stream of bytes from the reader.
if you pick one optimized for file opening and reading, its fastest.

-- bruce (sqlwork.com)


"Mark" <mmodrall@nospam.nospam> wrote in message
news:342C8154-A4A9-4088-80DE-DDAA9956BA7C@microsoft.com...[color=blue]
> Hi...
>
> We've been doing some basic performance testing comparing asp, asp.net,
> mono, and php. One of the basic tests is on simply parsing an xml
> document
> and streaming the result back to the client.
>
> I never would have thought of it, but someone in our group had heard that
> using XmlDocument.Load (Server.MapPath (file));
> was slower than actually creating the stream, the XmlTextReader, and
> passing
> the reader to the XmlDocument.Load();.
>
> I've tried it, and darn if he wasn't right.
>
> System.Xml.XmlDocument DOMObj = new System.Xml.XmlDocument();
> System.IO.StreamReader stream = new System.IO.StreamReader
> (Server.MapPath("file.xml"));
> System.Xml.XmlTextReader reader = new System.Xml.XmlTextReader(stream);
> reader.WhitespaceHandling = System.Xml.WhitespaceHandling.None;
> DOMObj.Load(reader);
>
> was 5% faster than
>
> System.Xml.XmlDocument DOMObj = new System.Xml.XmlDocument();
> System.Xml.XmlTextReader reader = new
> System.Xml.XmlTextReader(Server.MapPath ("file.xml"));
> reader.WhitespaceHandling = System.Xml.WhitespaceHandling.None;
> DOMObj.Load(reader);
>
> which was 20% faster than
> System.Xml.XmlDocument DOMObj = new System.Xml.XmlDocument();
> DOMObj.PreserveWhitespace = true;
> DOMObj.Load(Server.MapPath("file.xml"));
>
> I can't think of any reason why it's so much faster to manually create
> your
> own stream and XmlTextReader rather than letting XmlDocument figure out
> the
> fastest way to process the document.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Thanks
> _mark
>[/color]

re: odd performance question - xml parsing

Thanks for the great answer, Bruce...

-Mark