When running my asp.net hosting service (asp.net without IIS), on server
2003 with IIS not installed, I get the following when trying to process a
request.
"System.DllNotFoundException: Unable to load DLL (aspnet_isapi.dll)."
Of course the dll is able to be found, it's still in the framework directory
and for grins I even put it in my service's local directory. This is apparantly
server 2003 not allowing asp.net to be run if IIS was not installed. Is
there any way around this?
This works on win2000, xp with and without IIS, and on server 2003 with IIS.
22  3224 
If you can get ASP.NET to run without IIS having been installed,
unless you are running another web server which can host the
ASP.NET processes, like Cassini, I'll give you a medal.
How do you expect ASP.NET to run, if not on IIS ?
Did you write a web server for ASP.NET to run on ?
re: for grins I even put it in my service's local directory
I find that illogical actions are not a source of humor.
OTOH, I grin at what you attempted to do... ;-)
Juan T. Llibre, ASP.NET MVP
ASP.NET FAQ : http://asp.net.do/faq/
ASPNETFAQ.COM : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
Foros de ASP.NET en Espaņol : http://asp.net.do/foros/
======================================
"EP" <re***@newgrouponly.please> wrote in message
news:e3*************************@msnews.microsoft. com...
When running my asp.net hosting service (asp.net without IIS), on server 2003 with IIS
not installed, I get the following when trying to process a request.
"System.DllNotFoundException: Unable to load DLL (aspnet_isapi.dll)."
Of course the dll is able to be found, it's still in the framework directory and for
grins I even put it in my service's local directory. This is apparantly server 2003 not
allowing asp.net to be run if IIS was not installed. Is there any way around this?
This works on win2000, xp with and without IIS, and on server 2003 with IIS.
Well I've been working on this since yesterday, and found the solution about
10 minutes after posting here!!!
If anyone else has this problem, simply run aspnet_regiis with IIS uninstalled,
and your asp.net runtime will start working again.
In response to Juan, yes our service hosts it's own web server which was
loosly based on cassini, and exposes web services.
Hello Juan, If you can get ASP.NET to run without IIS having been installed,
unless you are running another web server which can host the ASP.NET
processes, like Cassini, I'll give you a medal.
How do you expect ASP.NET to run, if not on IIS ?
Did you write a web server for ASP.NET to run on ?
re:
for grins I even put it in my service's local directory
I find that illogical actions are not a source of humor. OTOH, I grin
at what you attempted to do... ;-)
Juan T. Llibre, ASP.NET MVP
ASP.NET FAQ : http://asp.net.do/faq/
ASPNETFAQ.COM : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
Foros de ASP.NET en Espaņol : http://asp.net.do/foros/
======================================
"EP" <re***@newgrouponly.please> wrote in message
news:e3*************************@msnews.microsoft. com... When running my asp.net hosting service (asp.net without IIS), on
server 2003 with IIS not installed, I get the following when trying
to process a request. "System.DllNotFoundException: Unable to load
DLL (aspnet_isapi.dll)."
Of course the dll is able to be found, it's still in the framework
directory and for grins I even put it in my service's local
directory. This is apparantly server 2003 not allowing asp.net to be
run if IIS was not installed. Is there any way around this?
This works on win2000, xp with and without IIS, and on server 2003
with IIS.
re: If anyone else has this problem, simply run aspnet_regiis with IIS uninstalled, and your
asp.net runtime will start working again.
Huh ?
Didn't you say that you are *not* running IIS ?
As its name indicates, aspnet_regiis registers asp.net with IIS!
If there's no IIS, it can't register asp.net with it.
re: In response to Juan, yes our service hosts it's own web server which was loosly based on
cassini, and exposes web services.
I figured as much.
I don't understand how aspnet_regiis can register it with your web server, though.
If your web server is based on Cassini, it should run asp.net files out of the box.
Juan T. Llibre, ASP.NET MVP
ASP.NET FAQ : http://asp.net.do/faq/
ASPNETFAQ.COM : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
Foros de ASP.NET en Espaņol : http://asp.net.do/foros/
======================================
"EP" <re***@newgrouponly.please> wrote in message
news:e3*************************@msnews.microsoft. com... Well I've been working on this since yesterday, and found the solution about 10 minutes
after posting here!!!
If anyone else has this problem, simply run aspnet_regiis with IIS uninstalled, and your
asp.net runtime will start working again.
In response to Juan, yes our service hosts it's own web server which was loosly based on
cassini, and exposes web services.
Hello Juan,
If you can get ASP.NET to run without IIS having been installed,
unless you are running another web server which can host the ASP.NET
processes, like Cassini, I'll give you a medal.
How do you expect ASP.NET to run, if not on IIS ?
Did you write a web server for ASP.NET to run on ?
re:
for grins I even put it in my service's local directory
I find that illogical actions are not a source of humor. OTOH, I grin
at what you attempted to do... ;-)
Juan T. Llibre, ASP.NET MVP
ASP.NET FAQ : http://asp.net.do/faq/
ASPNETFAQ.COM : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
Foros de ASP.NET en Espaņol : http://asp.net.do/foros/
======================================
"EP" <re***@newgrouponly.please> wrote in message
news:e3*************************@msnews.microsoft. com... When running my asp.net hosting service (asp.net without IIS), on
server 2003 with IIS not installed, I get the following when trying
to process a request. "System.DllNotFoundException: Unable to load
DLL (aspnet_isapi.dll)."
Of course the dll is able to be found, it's still in the framework
directory and for grins I even put it in my service's local
directory. This is apparantly server 2003 not allowing asp.net to be
run if IIS was not installed. Is there any way around this?
This works on win2000, xp with and without IIS, and on server 2003
with IIS.
Yes, that is what one would think. But in reality, server 2003 is different.
aspnet_regiis apparantly does some registry settings or sets other switches
which the asp.net framework looks for while on 2003.
And yes, one would think that aspnet_regiis wouldn't have any effect if iis
is not there, but it does. If your web server is based on Cassini, it should run asp.net files
out of the box.
one would think so, But it doesn't. The .net framework behaves differently
on server 2003, which is why the sp1 redistributable for .net 1.1 has a different
redistributable file for server 2003.
while it's counter-intuitive, put very simply... if you uninstall IIS and
no not run aspnet_regiis, you get DllNotFound(asp_isapi.dll). Once you run
aspnet_regiis, it works.
re:
If anyone else has this problem, simply run aspnet_regiis with IIS
uninstalled, and your asp.net runtime will start working again.
Huh ?
Didn't you say that you are *not* running IIS ?
As its name indicates, aspnet_regiis registers asp.net with IIS!
If there's no IIS, it can't register asp.net with it.
re:
In response to Juan, yes our service hosts it's own web server which
was loosly based on cassini, and exposes web services.
I figured as much.
I don't understand how aspnet_regiis can register it with your web
server, though.
If your web server is based on Cassini, it should run asp.net files
out of the box.
Juan T. Llibre, ASP.NET MVP
ASP.NET FAQ : http://asp.net.do/faq/
ASPNETFAQ.COM : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
Foros de ASP.NET en Espaņol : http://asp.net.do/foros/
======================================
"EP" <re***@newgrouponly.please> wrote in message
news:e3*************************@msnews.microsoft. com... Well I've been working on this since yesterday, and found the
solution about 10 minutes
after posting here!!!
If anyone else has this problem, simply run aspnet_regiis with IIS
uninstalled, and your
asp.net runtime will start working again.
In response to Juan, yes our service hosts it's own web server which
was loosly based on cassini, and exposes web services.
Hello Juan,
If you can get ASP.NET to run without IIS having been installed,
unless you are running another web server which can host the ASP.NET
processes, like Cassini, I'll give you a medal.
How do you expect ASP.NET to run, if not on IIS ? Did you write a
web server for ASP.NET to run on ? re:
for grins I even put it in my service's local directory
I find that illogical actions are not a source of humor. OTOH, I
grin at what you attempted to do... ;-)
Juan T. Llibre, ASP.NET MVP
ASP.NET FAQ : http://asp.net.do/faq/
ASPNETFAQ.COM : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
Foros de ASP.NET en Espaņol : http://asp.net.do/foros/
======================================
"EP" <re***@newgrouponly.please> wrote in message
news:e3*************************@msnews.microsoft. com...
When running my asp.net hosting service (asp.net without IIS), on
server 2003 with IIS not installed, I get the following when trying
to process a request. "System.DllNotFoundException: Unable to load
DLL (aspnet_isapi.dll)."
Of course the dll is able to be found, it's still in the framework
directory and for grins I even put it in my service's local
directory. This is apparantly server 2003 not allowing asp.net to
be run if IIS was not installed. Is there any way around this?
This works on win2000, xp with and without IIS, and on server 2003
with IIS.
re: the sp1 redistributable for .net 1.1 has a different
redistributable file for server 2003.
It does ?
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...displaylang=en
says differently...
"Supported Operating Systems: TabletPC; Windows 2000; Windows 2000 Advanced Server;
Windows 2000 Professional Edition ; Windows 2000 Server; Windows 2000 Service Pack 2;
Windows 2000 Service Pack 3; Windows 2000 Service Pack 4; Windows 98; Windows 98
Second Edition; Windows ME; Windows NT; Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 1 for
Itanium-based Systems; Windows Server 2003, Datacenter Edition for 64-Bit Itanium-Based
Systems; Windows Server 2003, Datacenter x64 Edition; Windows Server 2003, Enterprise
Edition for Itanium-based Systems; Windows Server 2003, Enterprise x64 Edition; Windows
Server 2003, Standard x64 Edition; Windows XP; Windows XP 64-bit; Windows XP for
Itanium-based Systems Version 2003; Windows XP Home Edition ; Windows XP Media
Center Edition; Windows XP Professional 64-Bit Edition (Itanium) ; Windows XP Professional
64-Bit Edition (Itanium) 2003; Windows XP Professional Edition ; Windows XP Service Pack
1;
Windows XP Service Pack 2."
All operating system get the same .Net Framework's SP1.
Maybe you're operating on assumptions, instead of facts ?
Juan T. Llibre, ASP.NET MVP
ASP.NET FAQ : http://asp.net.do/faq/
ASPNETFAQ.COM : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
Foros de ASP.NET en Espaņol : http://asp.net.do/foros/
======================================
"EP" <re***@newgrouponly.please> wrote in message
news:e3*************************@msnews.microsoft. com... Yes, that is what one would think. But in reality, server 2003 is different.
aspnet_regiis apparantly does some registry settings or sets other switches which the
asp.net framework looks for while on 2003.
And yes, one would think that aspnet_regiis wouldn't have any effect if iis is not
there, but it does.
If your web server is based on Cassini, it should run asp.net files
out of the box.
one would think so, But it doesn't. The .net framework behaves differently on server
2003, which is why the sp1 redistributable for .net 1.1 has a different redistributable
file for server 2003.
while it's counter-intuitive, put very simply... if you uninstall IIS and no not run
aspnet_regiis, you get DllNotFound(asp_isapi.dll). Once you run aspnet_regiis, it
works.
re:
If anyone else has this problem, simply run aspnet_regiis with IIS
uninstalled, and your asp.net runtime will start working again.
Huh ?
Didn't you say that you are *not* running IIS ?
As its name indicates, aspnet_regiis registers asp.net with IIS!
If there's no IIS, it can't register asp.net with it.
re:
In response to Juan, yes our service hosts it's own web server which
was loosly based on cassini, and exposes web services.
I figured as much.
I don't understand how aspnet_regiis can register it with your web
server, though.
If your web server is based on Cassini, it should run asp.net files
out of the box.
Juan T. Llibre, ASP.NET MVP
ASP.NET FAQ : http://asp.net.do/faq/
ASPNETFAQ.COM : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
Foros de ASP.NET en Espaņol : http://asp.net.do/foros/
======================================
"EP" <re***@newgrouponly.please> wrote in message
news:e3*************************@msnews.microsoft. com... Well I've been working on this since yesterday, and found the
solution about 10 minutes
after posting here!!!
If anyone else has this problem, simply run aspnet_regiis with IIS
uninstalled, and your
asp.net runtime will start working again.
In response to Juan, yes our service hosts it's own web server which
was loosly based on cassini, and exposes web services.
Hello Juan,
If you can get ASP.NET to run without IIS having been installed,
unless you are running another web server which can host the ASP.NET
processes, like Cassini, I'll give you a medal.
How do you expect ASP.NET to run, if not on IIS ? Did you write a
web server for ASP.NET to run on ? re:
> for grins I even put it in my service's local directory
>
I find that illogical actions are not a source of humor. OTOH, I
grin at what you attempted to do... ;-)
Juan T. Llibre, ASP.NET MVP
ASP.NET FAQ : http://asp.net.do/faq/
ASPNETFAQ.COM : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
Foros de ASP.NET en Espaņol : http://asp.net.do/foros/
======================================
"EP" <re***@newgrouponly.please> wrote in message
news:e3*************************@msnews.microsoft. com...
> When running my asp.net hosting service (asp.net without IIS), on
> server 2003 with IIS not installed, I get the following when trying
> to process a request. "System.DllNotFoundException: Unable to load
> DLL (aspnet_isapi.dll)."
>
> Of course the dll is able to be found, it's still in the framework
> directory and for grins I even put it in my service's local
> directory. This is apparantly server 2003 not allowing asp.net to
> be run if IIS was not installed. Is there any way around this?
>
> This works on win2000, xp with and without IIS, and on server 2003
> with IIS.
>
Well juan, I posted a problem and the resulting solution. I'm not sure why
you refuse to accept my first-hand experience. Have you tried it? I'm also
not sure why you feel it necessary to try to prove me wrong in a situation
that you have no experience in. It almost seems you have some religious
belief about the way that asp.net works on server 2003 and the way the service
pack is distributed. I'm very sorry if I've disappointed you, and didn't
mean to make your belief system come crashing down. the sp1 redistributable for .net 1.1 has a different redistributable
file for server 2003.
It does ?
Yes it does.
Microsoft .NET Framework 1.1 Service Pack 1 for Windows Server 2003
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...displaylang=en
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...=a8f5654f-088e
-40b2-bbdb-a83353618b38&displaylang=en
says differently...
You posted a list of special editions of server 2003, for x64 and itanium.
Ok, i'll be more specific. I am running server 2003 standard edition. I
am not running one of the special cases from your list....
Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 1 for Itanium-based Systems;
Windows Server 2003, Datacenter Edition for 64-Bit Itanium-Based Systems;
Windows Server 2003, Datacenter x64 Edition;
Windows Server 2003, Enterprise Edition for Itanium-based Systems;
Windows Server 2003, Enterprise x64 Edition;
Windows Server 2003, Standard x64 Edition;
Maybe you're operating on assumptions, instead of facts ?
no, i am operating on facts and first-hand experience. I'm sorry you assumed
otherwise.
Thanks
-Eric
re:
the sp1 redistributable for .net 1.1 has a different redistributable
file for server 2003.
It does ?
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...=a8f5654f-088e
-40b2-bbdb-a83353618b38&displaylang=en
says differently...
"Supported Operating Systems: TabletPC; Windows 2000; Windows 2000
Advanced Server;
Windows 2000 Professional Edition ; Windows 2000 Server; Windows 2000
Service Pack 2;
Windows 2000 Service Pack 3; Windows 2000 Service Pack 4; Windows 98;
Windows 98
Second Edition; Windows ME; Windows NT; Windows Server 2003 Service
Pack 1 for
Itanium-based Systems; Windows Server 2003, Datacenter Edition for
64-Bit Itanium-Based
Systems; Windows Server 2003, Datacenter x64 Edition; Windows Server
2003, Enterprise
Edition for Itanium-based Systems; Windows Server 2003, Enterprise x64
Edition; Windows
Server 2003, Standard x64 Edition; Windows XP; Windows XP 64-bit;
Windows XP for
Itanium-based Systems Version 2003; Windows XP Home Edition ; Windows
XP Media
Center Edition; Windows XP Professional 64-Bit Edition (Itanium) ;
Windows XP Professional
64-Bit Edition (Itanium) 2003; Windows XP Professional Edition ;
Windows XP Service Pack
1;
Windows XP Service Pack 2."
All operating system get the same .Net Framework's SP1.
Maybe you're operating on assumptions, instead of facts ?
Juan T. Llibre, ASP.NET MVP
ASP.NET FAQ : http://asp.net.do/faq/
ASPNETFAQ.COM : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
Foros de ASP.NET en Espaņol : http://asp.net.do/foros/
======================================
"EP" <re***@newgrouponly.please> wrote in message
news:e3*************************@msnews.microsoft. com... Yes, that is what one would think. But in reality, server 2003 is
different.
aspnet_regiis apparantly does some registry settings or sets other
switches which the
asp.net framework looks for while on 2003.
And yes, one would think that aspnet_regiis wouldn't have any effect
if iis is not
there, but it does. If your web server is based on Cassini, it should run asp.net files
out of the box.
one would think so, But it doesn't. The .net framework behaves
differently on server 2003, which is why the sp1 redistributable for
.net 1.1 has a different redistributable file for server 2003.
while it's counter-intuitive, put very simply... if you uninstall IIS
and no not run aspnet_regiis, you get DllNotFound(asp_isapi.dll).
Once you run aspnet_regiis, it works.
re:
If anyone else has this problem, simply run aspnet_regiis with IIS
uninstalled, and your asp.net runtime will start working again.
Huh ?
Didn't you say that you are *not* running IIS ?
As its name indicates, aspnet_regiis registers asp.net with IIS!
If there's no IIS, it can't register asp.net with it.
re:
In response to Juan, yes our service hosts it's own web server
which was loosly based on cassini, and exposes web services.
I figured as much.
I don't understand how aspnet_regiis can register it with your web
server, though.
If your web server is based on Cassini, it should run asp.net files
out of the box.
Juan T. Llibre, ASP.NET MVP
ASP.NET FAQ : http://asp.net.do/faq/
ASPNETFAQ.COM : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
Foros de ASP.NET en Espaņol : http://asp.net.do/foros/
======================================
"EP" <re***@newgrouponly.please> wrote in message
news:e3*************************@msnews.microsoft. com...
Well I've been working on this since yesterday, and found the
solution about 10 minutes
after posting here!!!
If anyone else has this problem, simply run aspnet_regiis with IIS
uninstalled, and your
asp.net runtime will start working again.
In response to Juan, yes our service hosts it's own web server
which
was loosly based on cassini, and exposes web services.
Hello Juan,
> If you can get ASP.NET to run without IIS having been installed,
> unless you are running another web server which can host the
> ASP.NET processes, like Cassini, I'll give you a medal.
>
> How do you expect ASP.NET to run, if not on IIS ? Did you write a
> web server for ASP.NET to run on ? re:
>
>> for grins I even put it in my service's local directory
>>
> I find that illogical actions are not a source of humor. OTOH, I
> grin at what you attempted to do... ;-)
>
> Juan T. Llibre, ASP.NET MVP
> ASP.NET FAQ : http://asp.net.do/faq/
> ASPNETFAQ.COM : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
> Foros de ASP.NET en Espaņol : http://asp.net.do/foros/
> ======================================
> "EP" <re***@newgrouponly.please> wrote in message
> news:e3*************************@msnews.microsoft. com...
>> When running my asp.net hosting service (asp.net without IIS), on
>> server 2003 with IIS not installed, I get the following when
>> trying to process a request. "System.DllNotFoundException: Unable
>> to load DLL (aspnet_isapi.dll)."
>>
>> Of course the dll is able to be found, it's still in the
>> framework directory and for grins I even put it in my service's
>> local directory. This is apparantly server 2003 not allowing
>> asp.net to be run if IIS was not installed. Is there any way
>> around this?
>>
>> This works on win2000, xp with and without IIS, and on server
>> 2003 with IIS.
>>
Ha! That was a very funny, and enlightening thread. Juan, you really
have to think before you post. You're an ASP.NET MVP for pity's sake,
so before you start being a smart-ass do some extra research.
EP wrote: Well juan, I posted a problem and the resulting solution. I'm not sure why
you refuse to accept my first-hand experience. Have you tried it? I'm also
not sure why you feel it necessary to try to prove me wrong in a situation
that you have no experience in. It almost seems you have some religious
belief about the way that asp.net works on server 2003 and the way the service
pack is distributed. I'm very sorry if I've disappointed you, and didn't
mean to make your belief system come crashing down.
the sp1 redistributable for .net 1.1 has a different redistributable
file for server 2003.
It does ?
Yes it does.
Microsoft .NET Framework 1.1 Service Pack 1 for Windows Server 2003
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...displaylang=en
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...=a8f5654f-088e
-40b2-bbdb-a83353618b38&displaylang=en
says differently...
You posted a list of special editions of server 2003, for x64 and itanium.
Ok, i'll be more specific. I am running server 2003 standard edition. I
am not running one of the special cases from your list....
Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 1 for Itanium-based Systems;
Windows Server 2003, Datacenter Edition for 64-Bit Itanium-Based Systems;
Windows Server 2003, Datacenter x64 Edition;
Windows Server 2003, Enterprise Edition for Itanium-based Systems;
Windows Server 2003, Enterprise x64 Edition;
Windows Server 2003, Standard x64 Edition;
Maybe you're operating on assumptions, instead of facts ?
no, i am operating on facts and first-hand experience. I'm sorry you assumed
otherwise.
Thanks
-Eric
re:
the sp1 redistributable for .net 1.1 has a different redistributable
file for server 2003.
It does ?
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...=a8f5654f-088e
-40b2-bbdb-a83353618b38&displaylang=en
says differently...
"Supported Operating Systems: TabletPC; Windows 2000; Windows 2000
Advanced Server;
Windows 2000 Professional Edition ; Windows 2000 Server; Windows 2000
Service Pack 2;
Windows 2000 Service Pack 3; Windows 2000 Service Pack 4; Windows 98;
Windows 98
Second Edition; Windows ME; Windows NT; Windows Server 2003 Service
Pack 1 for
Itanium-based Systems; Windows Server 2003, Datacenter Edition for
64-Bit Itanium-Based
Systems; Windows Server 2003, Datacenter x64 Edition; Windows Server
2003, Enterprise
Edition for Itanium-based Systems; Windows Server 2003, Enterprise x64
Edition; Windows
Server 2003, Standard x64 Edition; Windows XP; Windows XP 64-bit;
Windows XP for
Itanium-based Systems Version 2003; Windows XP Home Edition ; Windows
XP Media
Center Edition; Windows XP Professional 64-Bit Edition (Itanium) ;
Windows XP Professional
64-Bit Edition (Itanium) 2003; Windows XP Professional Edition ;
Windows XP Service Pack
1;
Windows XP Service Pack 2."
All operating system get the same .Net Framework's SP1.
Maybe you're operating on assumptions, instead of facts ?
Juan T. Llibre, ASP.NET MVP
ASP.NET FAQ : http://asp.net.do/faq/
ASPNETFAQ.COM : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
Foros de ASP.NET en Espaņol : http://asp.net.do/foros/
======================================
"EP" <re***@newgrouponly.please> wrote in message
news:e3*************************@msnews.microsoft. com... Yes, that is what one would think. But in reality, server 2003 is
different.
aspnet_regiis apparantly does some registry settings or sets other
switches which the
asp.net framework looks for while on 2003.
And yes, one would think that aspnet_regiis wouldn't have any effect
if iis is not
there, but it does.
If your web server is based on Cassini, it should run asp.net files
out of the box.
one would think so, But it doesn't. The .net framework behaves
differently on server 2003, which is why the sp1 redistributable for
.net 1.1 has a different redistributable file for server 2003.
while it's counter-intuitive, put very simply... if you uninstall IIS
and no not run aspnet_regiis, you get DllNotFound(asp_isapi.dll).
Once you run aspnet_regiis, it works.
re:
> If anyone else has this problem, simply run aspnet_regiis with IIS
> uninstalled, and your asp.net runtime will start working again.
>
Huh ?
Didn't you say that you are *not* running IIS ?
As its name indicates, aspnet_regiis registers asp.net with IIS!
If there's no IIS, it can't register asp.net with it.
re:
> In response to Juan, yes our service hosts it's own web server
> which was loosly based on cassini, and exposes web services.
>
I figured as much.
I don't understand how aspnet_regiis can register it with your web
server, though.
If your web server is based on Cassini, it should run asp.net files
out of the box.
Juan T. Llibre, ASP.NET MVP
ASP.NET FAQ : http://asp.net.do/faq/
ASPNETFAQ.COM : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
Foros de ASP.NET en Espaņol : http://asp.net.do/foros/
======================================
"EP" <re***@newgrouponly.please> wrote in message
news:e3*************************@msnews.microsoft. com...
> Well I've been working on this since yesterday, and found the
> solution about 10 minutes
> after posting here!!!
> If anyone else has this problem, simply run aspnet_regiis with IIS
> uninstalled, and your
> asp.net runtime will start working again.
> In response to Juan, yes our service hosts it's own web server
> which
> was loosly based on cassini, and exposes web services.
> Hello Juan,
>
>> If you can get ASP.NET to run without IIS having been installed,
>> unless you are running another web server which can host the
>> ASP.NET processes, like Cassini, I'll give you a medal.
>>
>> How do you expect ASP.NET to run, if not on IIS ? Did you write a
>> web server for ASP.NET to run on ? re:
>>
>>> for grins I even put it in my service's local directory
>>>
>> I find that illogical actions are not a source of humor. OTOH, I
>> grin at what you attempted to do... ;-)
>>
>> Juan T. Llibre, ASP.NET MVP
>> ASP.NET FAQ : http://asp.net.do/faq/
>> ASPNETFAQ.COM : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
>> Foros de ASP.NET en Espaņol : http://asp.net.do/foros/
>> ======================================
>> "EP" <re***@newgrouponly.please> wrote in message
>> news:e3*************************@msnews.microsoft. com...
>>> When running my asp.net hosting service (asp.net without IIS), on
>>> server 2003 with IIS not installed, I get the following when
>>> trying to process a request. "System.DllNotFoundException: Unable
>>> to load DLL (aspnet_isapi.dll)."
>>>
>>> Of course the dll is able to be found, it's still in the
>>> framework directory and for grins I even put it in my service's
>>> local directory. This is apparantly server 2003 not allowing
>>> asp.net to be run if IIS was not installed. Is there any way
>>> around this?
>>>
>>> This works on win2000, xp with and without IIS, and on server
>>> 2003 with IIS.
>>>
re: Well juan, I posted a problem and the resulting solution.
That part I accepted.
re: I'm not sure why you refuse to accept my first-hand experience.
Because I can't stand incorrect information being disseminated ?
You posted that : the sp1 redistributable for .net 1.1 has a different redistributable file for server
2003.
That's plainly incorrect.
I did *not* refer to your other statements.
re: Ok, i'll be more specific. I am running server 2003 standard edition.
OK, where is the "special" sp1 edition for server 2003 standard edition ?
re:"It almost seems you have some religious belief about the way that asp.net works on
server 2003 and the way the service pack is distributed."
I'll skip answering that.
When you find a special sp1 edition for
server 2003 standard edition, I might change my mind.
Juan T. Llibre, ASP.NET MVP
ASP.NET FAQ : http://asp.net.do/faq/
ASPNETFAQ.COM : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
Foros de ASP.NET en Espaņol : http://asp.net.do/foros/
======================================
"EP" <re***@newgrouponly.please> wrote in message
news:e3*************************@msnews.microsoft. com... Well juan, I posted a problem and the resulting solution. I'm not sure why you refuse
to accept my first-hand experience. Have you tried it? I'm also not sure why you feel
it necessary to try to prove me wrong in a situation that you have no experience in. It
almost seems you have some religious belief about the way that asp.net works on server
2003 and the way the service pack is distributed. I'm very sorry if I've disappointed
you, and didn't mean to make your belief system come crashing down.
the sp1 redistributable for .net 1.1 has a different redistributable
file for server 2003.
It does ?
Yes it does.
Microsoft .NET Framework 1.1 Service Pack 1 for Windows Server 2003
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...displaylang=en
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...=a8f5654f-088e
-40b2-bbdb-a83353618b38&displaylang=en
says differently...
You posted a list of special editions of server 2003, for x64 and itanium.
Ok, i'll be more specific. I am running server 2003 standard edition. I am not running
one of the special cases from your list....
Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 1 for Itanium-based Systems; Windows Server 2003,
Datacenter Edition for 64-Bit Itanium-Based Systems; Windows Server 2003, Datacenter x64
Edition; Windows Server 2003, Enterprise Edition for Itanium-based Systems; Windows
Server 2003, Enterprise x64 Edition; Windows Server 2003, Standard x64 Edition;
Maybe you're operating on assumptions, instead of facts ?
no, i am operating on facts and first-hand experience. I'm sorry you assumed otherwise.
Thanks
-Eric
re:
the sp1 redistributable for .net 1.1 has a different redistributable
file for server 2003.
It does ?
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...=a8f5654f-088e
-40b2-bbdb-a83353618b38&displaylang=en
says differently...
"Supported Operating Systems: TabletPC; Windows 2000; Windows 2000
Advanced Server;
Windows 2000 Professional Edition ; Windows 2000 Server; Windows 2000
Service Pack 2;
Windows 2000 Service Pack 3; Windows 2000 Service Pack 4; Windows 98;
Windows 98
Second Edition; Windows ME; Windows NT; Windows Server 2003 Service
Pack 1 for
Itanium-based Systems; Windows Server 2003, Datacenter Edition for
64-Bit Itanium-Based
Systems; Windows Server 2003, Datacenter x64 Edition; Windows Server
2003, Enterprise
Edition for Itanium-based Systems; Windows Server 2003, Enterprise x64
Edition; Windows
Server 2003, Standard x64 Edition; Windows XP; Windows XP 64-bit;
Windows XP for
Itanium-based Systems Version 2003; Windows XP Home Edition ; Windows
XP Media
Center Edition; Windows XP Professional 64-Bit Edition (Itanium) ;
Windows XP Professional
64-Bit Edition (Itanium) 2003; Windows XP Professional Edition ;
Windows XP Service Pack
1;
Windows XP Service Pack 2."
All operating system get the same .Net Framework's SP1.
Maybe you're operating on assumptions, instead of facts ?
Juan T. Llibre, ASP.NET MVP
ASP.NET FAQ : http://asp.net.do/faq/
ASPNETFAQ.COM : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
Foros de ASP.NET en Espaņol : http://asp.net.do/foros/
======================================
"EP" <re***@newgrouponly.please> wrote in message
news:e3*************************@msnews.microsoft. com... Yes, that is what one would think. But in reality, server 2003 is
different.
aspnet_regiis apparantly does some registry settings or sets other
switches which the
asp.net framework looks for while on 2003.
And yes, one would think that aspnet_regiis wouldn't have any effect
if iis is not
there, but it does.
If your web server is based on Cassini, it should run asp.net files
out of the box.
one would think so, But it doesn't. The .net framework behaves
differently on server 2003, which is why the sp1 redistributable for
.net 1.1 has a different redistributable file for server 2003.
while it's counter-intuitive, put very simply... if you uninstall IIS
and no not run aspnet_regiis, you get DllNotFound(asp_isapi.dll).
Once you run aspnet_regiis, it works.
re:
> If anyone else has this problem, simply run aspnet_regiis with IIS
> uninstalled, and your asp.net runtime will start working again.
>
Huh ?
Didn't you say that you are *not* running IIS ?
As its name indicates, aspnet_regiis registers asp.net with IIS!
If there's no IIS, it can't register asp.net with it.
re:
> In response to Juan, yes our service hosts it's own web server
> which was loosly based on cassini, and exposes web services.
>
I figured as much.
I don't understand how aspnet_regiis can register it with your web
server, though.
If your web server is based on Cassini, it should run asp.net files
out of the box.
Juan T. Llibre, ASP.NET MVP
ASP.NET FAQ : http://asp.net.do/faq/
ASPNETFAQ.COM : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
Foros de ASP.NET en Espaņol : http://asp.net.do/foros/
======================================
"EP" <re***@newgrouponly.please> wrote in message
news:e3*************************@msnews.microsoft. com...
> Well I've been working on this since yesterday, and found the
> solution about 10 minutes
> after posting here!!!
> If anyone else has this problem, simply run aspnet_regiis with IIS
> uninstalled, and your
> asp.net runtime will start working again.
> In response to Juan, yes our service hosts it's own web server
> which
> was loosly based on cassini, and exposes web services.
> Hello Juan,
>
>> If you can get ASP.NET to run without IIS having been installed,
>> unless you are running another web server which can host the
>> ASP.NET processes, like Cassini, I'll give you a medal.
>>
>> How do you expect ASP.NET to run, if not on IIS ? Did you write a
>> web server for ASP.NET to run on ? re:
>>
>>> for grins I even put it in my service's local directory
>>>
>> I find that illogical actions are not a source of humor. OTOH, I
>> grin at what you attempted to do... ;-)
>>
>> Juan T. Llibre, ASP.NET MVP
>> ASP.NET FAQ : http://asp.net.do/faq/
>> ASPNETFAQ.COM : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
>> Foros de ASP.NET en Espaņol : http://asp.net.do/foros/
>> ======================================
>> "EP" <re***@newgrouponly.please> wrote in message
>> news:e3*************************@msnews.microsoft. com...
>>> When running my asp.net hosting service (asp.net without IIS), on
>>> server 2003 with IIS not installed, I get the following when
>>> trying to process a request. "System.DllNotFoundException: Unable
>>> to load DLL (aspnet_isapi.dll)."
>>>
>>> Of course the dll is able to be found, it's still in the
>>> framework directory and for grins I even put it in my service's
>>> local directory. This is apparantly server 2003 not allowing
>>> asp.net to be run if IIS was not installed. Is there any way
>>> around this?
>>>
>>> This works on win2000, xp with and without IIS, and on server
>>> 2003 with IIS.
>>>
Think again, and then post again.
See the reply just sent to EP's post.
Juan T. Llibre, ASP.NET MVP
ASP.NET FAQ : http://asp.net.do/faq/
ASPNETFAQ.COM : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
Foros de ASP.NET en Espaņol : http://asp.net.do/foros/
======================================
<ri**********@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:11**********************@g49g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com...
Ha! That was a very funny, and enlightening thread. Juan, you really
have to think before you post. You're an ASP.NET MVP for pity's sake,
so before you start being a smart-ass do some extra research.
EP wrote: Well juan, I posted a problem and the resulting solution. I'm not sure why
you refuse to accept my first-hand experience. Have you tried it?
>> I'm not sure why you refuse to accept my first-hand experience. Because I can't stand incorrect information being disseminated ?
which incorrect information?
the sp1 redistributable for .net 1.1 has a different redistributable
file for server 2003.
That's plainly incorrect.
?
Ok, i'll be more specific. I am running server 2003 standard
edition.
OK, where is the "special" sp1 edition for server 2003 standard
edition ?
my god...
Microsoft .NET Framework 1.1 Service Pack 1 for Windows Server 2003
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...displaylang=en
If you look at the operating sysems on that page, it lists "Windows server
2003". It is for all version of server 2003 other than the special editions
you listed.
re:
"It almost seems you have some religious belief about the way that
asp.net works on server 2003 and the way the service pack is
distributed."
I'll skip answering that.
When you find a special sp1 edition for
server 2003 standard edition, I might change my mind.
Juan T. Llibre, ASP.NET MVP
ASP.NET FAQ : http://asp.net.do/faq/
ASPNETFAQ.COM : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
Foros de ASP.NET en Espaņol : http://asp.net.do/foros/
======================================
"EP" <re***@newgrouponly.please> wrote in message
news:e3*************************@msnews.microsoft. com... Well juan, I posted a problem and the resulting solution. I'm not
sure why you refuse to accept my first-hand experience. Have you
tried it? I'm also not sure why you feel it necessary to try to
prove me wrong in a situation that you have no experience in. It
almost seems you have some religious belief about the way that
asp.net works on server 2003 and the way the service pack is
distributed. I'm very sorry if I've disappointed you, and didn't
mean to make your belief system come crashing down.
the sp1 redistributable for .net 1.1 has a different
redistributable file for server 2003.
It does ?
Yes it does.
Microsoft .NET Framework 1.1 Service Pack 1 for Windows Server 2003
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...d=AE7EDEF7-2CB
7-4864-8623-A1038563DF23&displaylang=en
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...id=a8f5654f-08
8e -40b2-bbdb-a83353618b38&displaylang=en
says differently...
You posted a list of special editions of server 2003, for x64 and
itanium.
Ok, i'll be more specific. I am running server 2003 standard
edition. I am not running
one of the special cases from your list....
Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 1 for Itanium-based Systems; Windows
Server 2003, Datacenter Edition for 64-Bit Itanium-Based Systems;
Windows Server 2003, Datacenter x64 Edition; Windows Server 2003,
Enterprise Edition for Itanium-based Systems; Windows Server 2003,
Enterprise x64 Edition; Windows Server 2003, Standard x64 Edition;
Maybe you're operating on assumptions, instead of facts ?
no, i am operating on facts and first-hand experience. I'm sorry you
assumed otherwise.
Thanks
-Eric re:
the sp1 redistributable for .net 1.1 has a different
redistributable file for server 2003.
It does ?
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...id=a8f5654f-08
8e -40b2-bbdb-a83353618b38&displaylang=en
says differently...
"Supported Operating Systems: TabletPC; Windows 2000; Windows 2000
Advanced Server;
Windows 2000 Professional Edition ; Windows 2000 Server; Windows
2000
Service Pack 2;
Windows 2000 Service Pack 3; Windows 2000 Service Pack 4; Windows
98;
Windows 98
Second Edition; Windows ME; Windows NT; Windows Server 2003 Service
Pack 1 for
Itanium-based Systems; Windows Server 2003, Datacenter Edition for
64-Bit Itanium-Based
Systems; Windows Server 2003, Datacenter x64 Edition; Windows Server
2003, Enterprise
Edition for Itanium-based Systems; Windows Server 2003, Enterprise
x64
Edition; Windows
Server 2003, Standard x64 Edition; Windows XP; Windows XP 64-bit;
Windows XP for
Itanium-based Systems Version 2003; Windows XP Home Edition ;
Windows
XP Media
Center Edition; Windows XP Professional 64-Bit Edition (Itanium) ;
Windows XP Professional
64-Bit Edition (Itanium) 2003; Windows XP Professional Edition ;
Windows XP Service Pack
1;
Windows XP Service Pack 2."
All operating system get the same .Net Framework's SP1.
Maybe you're operating on assumptions, instead of facts ?
Juan T. Llibre, ASP.NET MVP
ASP.NET FAQ : http://asp.net.do/faq/
ASPNETFAQ.COM : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
Foros de ASP.NET en Espaņol : http://asp.net.do/foros/
======================================
"EP" <re***@newgrouponly.please> wrote in message
news:e3*************************@msnews.microsoft. com...
Yes, that is what one would think. But in reality, server 2003 is
different.
aspnet_regiis apparantly does some registry settings or sets other
switches which the
asp.net framework looks for while on 2003.
And yes, one would think that aspnet_regiis wouldn't have any
effect
if iis is not
there, but it does.
> If your web server is based on Cassini, it should run asp.net
> files out of the box.
>
one would think so, But it doesn't. The .net framework behaves
differently on server 2003, which is why the sp1 redistributable
for .net 1.1 has a different redistributable file for server 2003.
while it's counter-intuitive, put very simply... if you uninstall
IIS and no not run aspnet_regiis, you get
DllNotFound(asp_isapi.dll). Once you run aspnet_regiis, it works.
> re:
>
>> If anyone else has this problem, simply run aspnet_regiis with
>> IIS uninstalled, and your asp.net runtime will start working
>> again.
>>
> Huh ?
>
> Didn't you say that you are *not* running IIS ?
> As its name indicates, aspnet_regiis registers asp.net with IIS!
> If there's no IIS, it can't register asp.net with it.
> re:
>> In response to Juan, yes our service hosts it's own web server
>> which was loosly based on cassini, and exposes web services.
>>
> I figured as much.
> I don't understand how aspnet_regiis can register it with your web
> server, though.
> If your web server is based on Cassini, it should run asp.net
> files
> out of the box.
> Juan T. Llibre, ASP.NET MVP
> ASP.NET FAQ : http://asp.net.do/faq/
> ASPNETFAQ.COM : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
> Foros de ASP.NET en Espaņol : http://asp.net.do/foros/
> ======================================
> "EP" <re***@newgrouponly.please> wrote in message
> news:e3*************************@msnews.microsoft. com...
>> Well I've been working on this since yesterday, and found the
>> solution about 10 minutes
>> after posting here!!!
>> If anyone else has this problem, simply run aspnet_regiis with
>> IIS
>> uninstalled, and your
>> asp.net runtime will start working again.
>> In response to Juan, yes our service hosts it's own web server
>> which
>> was loosly based on cassini, and exposes web services.
>> Hello Juan,
>>> If you can get ASP.NET to run without IIS having been installed,
>>> unless you are running another web server which can host the
>>> ASP.NET processes, like Cassini, I'll give you a medal.
>>>
>>> How do you expect ASP.NET to run, if not on IIS ? Did you write
>>> a web server for ASP.NET to run on ? re:
>>>
>>>> for grins I even put it in my service's local directory
>>>>
>>> I find that illogical actions are not a source of humor. OTOH, I
>>> grin at what you attempted to do... ;-)
>>>
>>> Juan T. Llibre, ASP.NET MVP
>>> ASP.NET FAQ : http://asp.net.do/faq/
>>> ASPNETFAQ.COM : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
>>> Foros de ASP.NET en Espaņol : http://asp.net.do/foros/
>>> ======================================
>>> "EP" <re***@newgrouponly.please> wrote in message
>>> news:e3*************************@msnews.microsoft. com...
>>>> When running my asp.net hosting service (asp.net without IIS),
>>>> on server 2003 with IIS not installed, I get the following when
>>>> trying to process a request. "System.DllNotFoundException:
>>>> Unable to load DLL (aspnet_isapi.dll)."
>>>>
>>>> Of course the dll is able to be found, it's still in the
>>>> framework directory and for grins I even put it in my service's
>>>> local directory. This is apparantly server 2003 not allowing
>>>> asp.net to be run if IIS was not installed. Is there any way
>>>> around this?
>>>>
>>>> This works on win2000, xp with and without IIS, and on server
>>>> 2003 with IIS.
>>>>
and another thing...
you keep telling me i'm wrong and am posting incorrect information, but have
you installed sp1 on 2003? Have you distributed a product cd that included
dotnet and it's service packs? Have you tried installing the link you sent
on a normal version of 2003? I have. Well juan, I posted a problem and the resulting solution.
That part I accepted.
re:
I'm not sure why you refuse to accept my first-hand experience.
Because I can't stand incorrect information being disseminated ?
You posted that :
the sp1 redistributable for .net 1.1 has a different redistributable
file for server 2003.
That's plainly incorrect.
I did *not* refer to your other statements.
re:
Ok, i'll be more specific. I am running server 2003 standard
edition.
OK, where is the "special" sp1 edition for server 2003 standard
edition ?
re:
"It almost seems you have some religious belief about the way that
asp.net works on server 2003 and the way the service pack is
distributed."
I'll skip answering that.
When you find a special sp1 edition for
server 2003 standard edition, I might change my mind.
Juan T. Llibre, ASP.NET MVP
ASP.NET FAQ : http://asp.net.do/faq/
ASPNETFAQ.COM : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
Foros de ASP.NET en Espaņol : http://asp.net.do/foros/
======================================
"EP" <re***@newgrouponly.please> wrote in message
news:e3*************************@msnews.microsoft. com... Well juan, I posted a problem and the resulting solution. I'm not
sure why you refuse to accept my first-hand experience. Have you
tried it? I'm also not sure why you feel it necessary to try to
prove me wrong in a situation that you have no experience in. It
almost seems you have some religious belief about the way that
asp.net works on server 2003 and the way the service pack is
distributed. I'm very sorry if I've disappointed you, and didn't
mean to make your belief system come crashing down.
the sp1 redistributable for .net 1.1 has a different
redistributable file for server 2003.
It does ?
Yes it does.
Microsoft .NET Framework 1.1 Service Pack 1 for Windows Server 2003
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...d=AE7EDEF7-2CB
7-4864-8623-A1038563DF23&displaylang=en
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...id=a8f5654f-08
8e -40b2-bbdb-a83353618b38&displaylang=en
says differently...
You posted a list of special editions of server 2003, for x64 and
itanium.
Ok, i'll be more specific. I am running server 2003 standard
edition. I am not running
one of the special cases from your list....
Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 1 for Itanium-based Systems; Windows
Server 2003, Datacenter Edition for 64-Bit Itanium-Based Systems;
Windows Server 2003, Datacenter x64 Edition; Windows Server 2003,
Enterprise Edition for Itanium-based Systems; Windows Server 2003,
Enterprise x64 Edition; Windows Server 2003, Standard x64 Edition;
Maybe you're operating on assumptions, instead of facts ?
no, i am operating on facts and first-hand experience. I'm sorry you
assumed otherwise.
Thanks
-Eric re:
the sp1 redistributable for .net 1.1 has a different
redistributable file for server 2003.
It does ?
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...id=a8f5654f-08
8e -40b2-bbdb-a83353618b38&displaylang=en
says differently...
"Supported Operating Systems: TabletPC; Windows 2000; Windows 2000
Advanced Server;
Windows 2000 Professional Edition ; Windows 2000 Server; Windows
2000
Service Pack 2;
Windows 2000 Service Pack 3; Windows 2000 Service Pack 4; Windows
98;
Windows 98
Second Edition; Windows ME; Windows NT; Windows Server 2003 Service
Pack 1 for
Itanium-based Systems; Windows Server 2003, Datacenter Edition for
64-Bit Itanium-Based
Systems; Windows Server 2003, Datacenter x64 Edition; Windows Server
2003, Enterprise
Edition for Itanium-based Systems; Windows Server 2003, Enterprise
x64
Edition; Windows
Server 2003, Standard x64 Edition; Windows XP; Windows XP 64-bit;
Windows XP for
Itanium-based Systems Version 2003; Windows XP Home Edition ;
Windows
XP Media
Center Edition; Windows XP Professional 64-Bit Edition (Itanium) ;
Windows XP Professional
64-Bit Edition (Itanium) 2003; Windows XP Professional Edition ;
Windows XP Service Pack
1;
Windows XP Service Pack 2."
All operating system get the same .Net Framework's SP1.
Maybe you're operating on assumptions, instead of facts ?
Juan T. Llibre, ASP.NET MVP
ASP.NET FAQ : http://asp.net.do/faq/
ASPNETFAQ.COM : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
Foros de ASP.NET en Espaņol : http://asp.net.do/foros/
======================================
"EP" <re***@newgrouponly.please> wrote in message
news:e3*************************@msnews.microsoft. com...
Yes, that is what one would think. But in reality, server 2003 is
different.
aspnet_regiis apparantly does some registry settings or sets other
switches which the
asp.net framework looks for while on 2003.
And yes, one would think that aspnet_regiis wouldn't have any
effect
if iis is not
there, but it does.
> If your web server is based on Cassini, it should run asp.net
> files out of the box.
>
one would think so, But it doesn't. The .net framework behaves
differently on server 2003, which is why the sp1 redistributable
for .net 1.1 has a different redistributable file for server 2003.
while it's counter-intuitive, put very simply... if you uninstall
IIS and no not run aspnet_regiis, you get
DllNotFound(asp_isapi.dll). Once you run aspnet_regiis, it works.
> re:
>
>> If anyone else has this problem, simply run aspnet_regiis with
>> IIS uninstalled, and your asp.net runtime will start working
>> again.
>>
> Huh ?
>
> Didn't you say that you are *not* running IIS ?
> As its name indicates, aspnet_regiis registers asp.net with IIS!
> If there's no IIS, it can't register asp.net with it.
> re:
>> In response to Juan, yes our service hosts it's own web server
>> which was loosly based on cassini, and exposes web services.
>>
> I figured as much.
> I don't understand how aspnet_regiis can register it with your web
> server, though.
> If your web server is based on Cassini, it should run asp.net
> files
> out of the box.
> Juan T. Llibre, ASP.NET MVP
> ASP.NET FAQ : http://asp.net.do/faq/
> ASPNETFAQ.COM : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
> Foros de ASP.NET en Espaņol : http://asp.net.do/foros/
> ======================================
> "EP" <re***@newgrouponly.please> wrote in message
> news:e3*************************@msnews.microsoft. com...
>> Well I've been working on this since yesterday, and found the
>> solution about 10 minutes
>> after posting here!!!
>> If anyone else has this problem, simply run aspnet_regiis with
>> IIS
>> uninstalled, and your
>> asp.net runtime will start working again.
>> In response to Juan, yes our service hosts it's own web server
>> which
>> was loosly based on cassini, and exposes web services.
>> Hello Juan,
>>> If you can get ASP.NET to run without IIS having been installed,
>>> unless you are running another web server which can host the
>>> ASP.NET processes, like Cassini, I'll give you a medal.
>>>
>>> How do you expect ASP.NET to run, if not on IIS ? Did you write
>>> a web server for ASP.NET to run on ? re:
>>>
>>>> for grins I even put it in my service's local directory
>>>>
>>> I find that illogical actions are not a source of humor. OTOH, I
>>> grin at what you attempted to do... ;-)
>>>
>>> Juan T. Llibre, ASP.NET MVP
>>> ASP.NET FAQ : http://asp.net.do/faq/
>>> ASPNETFAQ.COM : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
>>> Foros de ASP.NET en Espaņol : http://asp.net.do/foros/
>>> ======================================
>>> "EP" <re***@newgrouponly.please> wrote in message
>>> news:e3*************************@msnews.microsoft. com...
>>>> When running my asp.net hosting service (asp.net without IIS),
>>>> on server 2003 with IIS not installed, I get the following when
>>>> trying to process a request. "System.DllNotFoundException:
>>>> Unable to load DLL (aspnet_isapi.dll)."
>>>>
>>>> Of course the dll is able to be found, it's still in the
>>>> framework directory and for grins I even put it in my service's
>>>> local directory. This is apparantly server 2003 not allowing
>>>> asp.net to be run if IIS was not installed. Is there any way
>>>> around this?
>>>>
>>>> This works on win2000, xp with and without IIS, and on server
>>>> 2003 with IIS.
>>>>
What does he need to think about?
Juan please put your theories to the test...
Install server 2003 without IIS and try cassini, it won't work
try using that servicepack you posted on server 2003 (not itanium or x64),
it will tell you it can't install Think again, and then post again.
See the reply just sent to EP's post.
Juan T. Llibre, ASP.NET MVP
ASP.NET FAQ : http://asp.net.do/faq/
ASPNETFAQ.COM : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
Foros de ASP.NET en Espaņol : http://asp.net.do/foros/
======================================
<ri**********@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:11**********************@g49g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com...
Ha! That was a very funny, and enlightening thread. Juan, you really
have to think before you post. You're an ASP.NET MVP for pity's sake,
so before you start being a smart-ass do some extra research.
EP wrote:
Well juan, I posted a problem and the resulting solution. I'm not
sure why you refuse to accept my first-hand experience. Have you
tried it?
re: have you installed sp1 on 2003?
Since it was in Beta.
Juan T. Llibre, ASP.NET MVP
ASP.NET FAQ : http://asp.net.do/faq/
ASPNETFAQ.COM : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
Foros de ASP.NET en Espaņol : http://asp.net.do/foros/
======================================
"EP" <re***@newgrouponly.please> wrote in message
news:e3*************************@msnews.microsoft. com... and another thing...
you keep telling me i'm wrong and am posting incorrect information, but have you
installed sp1 on 2003? Have you distributed a product cd that included dotnet and it's
service packs? Have you tried installing the link you sent on a normal version of 2003?
I have.
Well juan, I posted a problem and the resulting solution.
That part I accepted.
re:
I'm not sure why you refuse to accept my first-hand experience.
Because I can't stand incorrect information being disseminated ?
You posted that :
the sp1 redistributable for .net 1.1 has a different redistributable
file for server 2003.
That's plainly incorrect.
I did *not* refer to your other statements.
re:
Ok, i'll be more specific. I am running server 2003 standard
edition.
OK, where is the "special" sp1 edition for server 2003 standard
edition ?
re:
"It almost seems you have some religious belief about the way that
asp.net works on server 2003 and the way the service pack is
distributed."
I'll skip answering that.
When you find a special sp1 edition for
server 2003 standard edition, I might change my mind.
Juan T. Llibre, ASP.NET MVP
ASP.NET FAQ : http://asp.net.do/faq/
ASPNETFAQ.COM : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
Foros de ASP.NET en Espaņol : http://asp.net.do/foros/
======================================
"EP" <re***@newgrouponly.please> wrote in message
news:e3*************************@msnews.microsoft. com... Well juan, I posted a problem and the resulting solution. I'm not
sure why you refuse to accept my first-hand experience. Have you
tried it? I'm also not sure why you feel it necessary to try to
prove me wrong in a situation that you have no experience in. It
almost seems you have some religious belief about the way that
asp.net works on server 2003 and the way the service pack is
distributed. I'm very sorry if I've disappointed you, and didn't
mean to make your belief system come crashing down.
> the sp1 redistributable for .net 1.1 has a different
> redistributable file for server 2003.
>
It does ?
Yes it does.
Microsoft .NET Framework 1.1 Service Pack 1 for Windows Server 2003
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...d=AE7EDEF7-2CB
7-4864-8623-A1038563DF23&displaylang=en
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...id=a8f5654f-08
8e -40b2-bbdb-a83353618b38&displaylang=en
says differently...
You posted a list of special editions of server 2003, for x64 and
itanium.
Ok, i'll be more specific. I am running server 2003 standard
edition. I am not running
one of the special cases from your list....
Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 1 for Itanium-based Systems; Windows
Server 2003, Datacenter Edition for 64-Bit Itanium-Based Systems;
Windows Server 2003, Datacenter x64 Edition; Windows Server 2003,
Enterprise Edition for Itanium-based Systems; Windows Server 2003,
Enterprise x64 Edition; Windows Server 2003, Standard x64 Edition;
Maybe you're operating on assumptions, instead of facts ?
no, i am operating on facts and first-hand experience. I'm sorry you
assumed otherwise.
Thanks
-Eric
re:
> the sp1 redistributable for .net 1.1 has a different
> redistributable file for server 2003.
>
It does ?
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...id=a8f5654f-08
8e -40b2-bbdb-a83353618b38&displaylang=en
says differently...
"Supported Operating Systems: TabletPC; Windows 2000; Windows 2000
Advanced Server;
Windows 2000 Professional Edition ; Windows 2000 Server; Windows
2000
Service Pack 2;
Windows 2000 Service Pack 3; Windows 2000 Service Pack 4; Windows
98;
Windows 98
Second Edition; Windows ME; Windows NT; Windows Server 2003 Service
Pack 1 for
Itanium-based Systems; Windows Server 2003, Datacenter Edition for
64-Bit Itanium-Based
Systems; Windows Server 2003, Datacenter x64 Edition; Windows Server
2003, Enterprise
Edition for Itanium-based Systems; Windows Server 2003, Enterprise
x64
Edition; Windows
Server 2003, Standard x64 Edition; Windows XP; Windows XP 64-bit;
Windows XP for
Itanium-based Systems Version 2003; Windows XP Home Edition ;
Windows
XP Media
Center Edition; Windows XP Professional 64-Bit Edition (Itanium) ;
Windows XP Professional
64-Bit Edition (Itanium) 2003; Windows XP Professional Edition ;
Windows XP Service Pack
1;
Windows XP Service Pack 2."
All operating system get the same .Net Framework's SP1.
Maybe you're operating on assumptions, instead of facts ?
Juan T. Llibre, ASP.NET MVP
ASP.NET FAQ : http://asp.net.do/faq/
ASPNETFAQ.COM : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
Foros de ASP.NET en Espaņol : http://asp.net.do/foros/
======================================
"EP" <re***@newgrouponly.please> wrote in message
news:e3*************************@msnews.microsoft. com...
> Yes, that is what one would think. But in reality, server 2003 is
> different.
> aspnet_regiis apparantly does some registry settings or sets other
> switches which the
> asp.net framework looks for while on 2003.
> And yes, one would think that aspnet_regiis wouldn't have any
> effect
> if iis is not
> there, but it does.
>> If your web server is based on Cassini, it should run asp.net
>> files out of the box.
>>
> one would think so, But it doesn't. The .net framework behaves
> differently on server 2003, which is why the sp1 redistributable
> for .net 1.1 has a different redistributable file for server 2003.
>
> while it's counter-intuitive, put very simply... if you uninstall
> IIS and no not run aspnet_regiis, you get
> DllNotFound(asp_isapi.dll). Once you run aspnet_regiis, it works.
>
>> re:
>>
>>> If anyone else has this problem, simply run aspnet_regiis with
>>> IIS uninstalled, and your asp.net runtime will start working
>>> again.
>>>
>> Huh ?
>>
>> Didn't you say that you are *not* running IIS ?
>> As its name indicates, aspnet_regiis registers asp.net with IIS!
>> If there's no IIS, it can't register asp.net with it.
>> re:
>>> In response to Juan, yes our service hosts it's own web server
>>> which was loosly based on cassini, and exposes web services.
>>>
>> I figured as much.
>> I don't understand how aspnet_regiis can register it with your web
>> server, though.
>> If your web server is based on Cassini, it should run asp.net
>> files
>> out of the box.
>> Juan T. Llibre, ASP.NET MVP
>> ASP.NET FAQ : http://asp.net.do/faq/
>> ASPNETFAQ.COM : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
>> Foros de ASP.NET en Espaņol : http://asp.net.do/foros/
>> ======================================
>> "EP" <re***@newgrouponly.please> wrote in message
>> news:e3*************************@msnews.microsoft. com...
>>> Well I've been working on this since yesterday, and found the
>>> solution about 10 minutes
>>> after posting here!!!
>>> If anyone else has this problem, simply run aspnet_regiis with
>>> IIS
>>> uninstalled, and your
>>> asp.net runtime will start working again.
>>> In response to Juan, yes our service hosts it's own web server
>>> which
>>> was loosly based on cassini, and exposes web services.
>>> Hello Juan,
>>>> If you can get ASP.NET to run without IIS having been installed,
>>>> unless you are running another web server which can host the
>>>> ASP.NET processes, like Cassini, I'll give you a medal.
>>>>
>>>> How do you expect ASP.NET to run, if not on IIS ? Did you write
>>>> a web server for ASP.NET to run on ? re:
>>>>
>>>>> for grins I even put it in my service's local directory
>>>>>
>>>> I find that illogical actions are not a source of humor. OTOH, I
>>>> grin at what you attempted to do... ;-)
>>>>
>>>> Juan T. Llibre, ASP.NET MVP
>>>> ASP.NET FAQ : http://asp.net.do/faq/
>>>> ASPNETFAQ.COM : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
>>>> Foros de ASP.NET en Espaņol : http://asp.net.do/foros/
>>>> ======================================
>>>> "EP" <re***@newgrouponly.please> wrote in message
>>>> news:e3*************************@msnews.microsoft. com...
>>>>> When running my asp.net hosting service (asp.net without IIS),
>>>>> on server 2003 with IIS not installed, I get the following when
>>>>> trying to process a request. "System.DllNotFoundException:
>>>>> Unable to load DLL (aspnet_isapi.dll)."
>>>>>
>>>>> Of course the dll is able to be found, it's still in the
>>>>> framework directory and for grins I even put it in my service's
>>>>> local directory. This is apparantly server 2003 not allowing
>>>>> asp.net to be run if IIS was not installed. Is there any way
>>>>> around this?
>>>>>
>>>>> This works on win2000, xp with and without IIS, and on server
>>>>> 2003 with IIS.
>>>>>
re: my god...
You *still* have not answered my question :
Where is the "special" sp1 edition for server 2003 standard edition ?
You stated that : the sp1 redistributable for .net 1.1 has a different
redistributable file for server 2003.
Where can that "special" SP1 edition be downloaded ?
Since you had, also, stated that : i am operating on facts and first-hand experience.
Could you tell us where you got that "first-hand experience" from ?
Where did you download the "special" SP1 for Windows 2003 Standard Edition ?
Juan T. Llibre, ASP.NET MVP
ASP.NET FAQ : http://asp.net.do/faq/
ASPNETFAQ.COM : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
Foros de ASP.NET en Espaņol : http://asp.net.do/foros/
======================================
"EP" <re***@newgrouponly.please> wrote in message
news:e3*************************@msnews.microsoft. com... I'm not sure why you refuse to accept my first-hand experience.
Because I can't stand incorrect information being disseminated ?
which incorrect information?
the sp1 redistributable for .net 1.1 has a different redistributable
file for server 2003.
That's plainly incorrect.
?
Ok, i'll be more specific. I am running server 2003 standard
edition.
OK, where is the "special" sp1 edition for server 2003 standard
edition ?
my god...
Microsoft .NET Framework 1.1 Service Pack 1 for Windows Server 2003
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...displaylang=en
If you look at the operating sysems on that page, it lists "Windows server 2003". It is
for all version of server 2003 other than the special editions you listed.
re: "It almost seems you have some religious belief about the way that
asp.net works on server 2003 and the way the service pack is
distributed."
I'll skip answering that.
When you find a special sp1 edition for
server 2003 standard edition, I might change my mind.
Juan T. Llibre, ASP.NET MVP
ASP.NET FAQ : http://asp.net.do/faq/
ASPNETFAQ.COM : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
Foros de ASP.NET en Espaņol : http://asp.net.do/foros/
======================================
"EP" <re***@newgrouponly.please> wrote in message
news:e3*************************@msnews.microsoft. com... Well juan, I posted a problem and the resulting solution. I'm not
sure why you refuse to accept my first-hand experience. Have you
tried it? I'm also not sure why you feel it necessary to try to
prove me wrong in a situation that you have no experience in. It
almost seems you have some religious belief about the way that
asp.net works on server 2003 and the way the service pack is
distributed. I'm very sorry if I've disappointed you, and didn't
mean to make your belief system come crashing down.
> the sp1 redistributable for .net 1.1 has a different
> redistributable file for server 2003.
>
It does ?
Yes it does.
Microsoft .NET Framework 1.1 Service Pack 1 for Windows Server 2003
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...d=AE7EDEF7-2CB
7-4864-8623-A1038563DF23&displaylang=en
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...id=a8f5654f-08
8e -40b2-bbdb-a83353618b38&displaylang=en
says differently...
You posted a list of special editions of server 2003, for x64 and
itanium.
Ok, i'll be more specific. I am running server 2003 standard
edition. I am not running
one of the special cases from your list....
Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 1 for Itanium-based Systems; Windows
Server 2003, Datacenter Edition for 64-Bit Itanium-Based Systems;
Windows Server 2003, Datacenter x64 Edition; Windows Server 2003,
Enterprise Edition for Itanium-based Systems; Windows Server 2003,
Enterprise x64 Edition; Windows Server 2003, Standard x64 Edition;
Maybe you're operating on assumptions, instead of facts ?
no, i am operating on facts and first-hand experience. I'm sorry you
assumed otherwise.
Thanks
-Eric
re:
> the sp1 redistributable for .net 1.1 has a different
> redistributable file for server 2003.
>
It does ?
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...id=a8f5654f-08
8e -40b2-bbdb-a83353618b38&displaylang=en
says differently...
"Supported Operating Systems: TabletPC; Windows 2000; Windows 2000
Advanced Server;
Windows 2000 Professional Edition ; Windows 2000 Server; Windows
2000
Service Pack 2;
Windows 2000 Service Pack 3; Windows 2000 Service Pack 4; Windows
98;
Windows 98
Second Edition; Windows ME; Windows NT; Windows Server 2003 Service
Pack 1 for
Itanium-based Systems; Windows Server 2003, Datacenter Edition for
64-Bit Itanium-Based
Systems; Windows Server 2003, Datacenter x64 Edition; Windows Server
2003, Enterprise
Edition for Itanium-based Systems; Windows Server 2003, Enterprise
x64
Edition; Windows
Server 2003, Standard x64 Edition; Windows XP; Windows XP 64-bit;
Windows XP for
Itanium-based Systems Version 2003; Windows XP Home Edition ;
Windows
XP Media
Center Edition; Windows XP Professional 64-Bit Edition (Itanium) ;
Windows XP Professional
64-Bit Edition (Itanium) 2003; Windows XP Professional Edition ;
Windows XP Service Pack
1;
Windows XP Service Pack 2."
All operating system get the same .Net Framework's SP1.
Maybe you're operating on assumptions, instead of facts ?
Juan T. Llibre, ASP.NET MVP
ASP.NET FAQ : http://asp.net.do/faq/
ASPNETFAQ.COM : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
Foros de ASP.NET en Espaņol : http://asp.net.do/foros/
======================================
"EP" <re***@newgrouponly.please> wrote in message
news:e3*************************@msnews.microsoft. com...
> Yes, that is what one would think. But in reality, server 2003 is
> different.
> aspnet_regiis apparantly does some registry settings or sets other
> switches which the
> asp.net framework looks for while on 2003.
> And yes, one would think that aspnet_regiis wouldn't have any
> effect
> if iis is not
> there, but it does.
>> If your web server is based on Cassini, it should run asp.net
>> files out of the box.
>>
> one would think so, But it doesn't. The .net framework behaves
> differently on server 2003, which is why the sp1 redistributable
> for .net 1.1 has a different redistributable file for server 2003.
>
> while it's counter-intuitive, put very simply... if you uninstall
> IIS and no not run aspnet_regiis, you get
> DllNotFound(asp_isapi.dll). Once you run aspnet_regiis, it works.
>
>> re:
>>
>>> If anyone else has this problem, simply run aspnet_regiis with
>>> IIS uninstalled, and your asp.net runtime will start working
>>> again.
>>>
>> Huh ?
>>
>> Didn't you say that you are *not* running IIS ?
>> As its name indicates, aspnet_regiis registers asp.net with IIS!
>> If there's no IIS, it can't register asp.net with it.
>> re:
>>> In response to Juan, yes our service hosts it's own web server
>>> which was loosly based on cassini, and exposes web services.
>>>
>> I figured as much.
>> I don't understand how aspnet_regiis can register it with your web
>> server, though.
>> If your web server is based on Cassini, it should run asp.net
>> files
>> out of the box.
>> Juan T. Llibre, ASP.NET MVP
>> ASP.NET FAQ : http://asp.net.do/faq/
>> ASPNETFAQ.COM : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
>> Foros de ASP.NET en Espaņol : http://asp.net.do/foros/
>> ======================================
>> "EP" <re***@newgrouponly.please> wrote in message
>> news:e3*************************@msnews.microsoft. com...
>>> Well I've been working on this since yesterday, and found the
>>> solution about 10 minutes
>>> after posting here!!!
>>> If anyone else has this problem, simply run aspnet_regiis with
>>> IIS
>>> uninstalled, and your
>>> asp.net runtime will start working again.
>>> In response to Juan, yes our service hosts it's own web server
>>> which
>>> was loosly based on cassini, and exposes web services.
>>> Hello Juan,
>>>> If you can get ASP.NET to run without IIS having been installed,
>>>> unless you are running another web server which can host the
>>>> ASP.NET processes, like Cassini, I'll give you a medal.
>>>>
>>>> How do you expect ASP.NET to run, if not on IIS ? Did you write
>>>> a web server for ASP.NET to run on ? re:
>>>>
>>>>> for grins I even put it in my service's local directory
>>>>>
>>>> I find that illogical actions are not a source of humor. OTOH, I
>>>> grin at what you attempted to do... ;-)
>>>>
>>>> Juan T. Llibre, ASP.NET MVP
>>>> ASP.NET FAQ : http://asp.net.do/faq/
>>>> ASPNETFAQ.COM : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
>>>> Foros de ASP.NET en Espaņol : http://asp.net.do/foros/
>>>> ======================================
>>>> "EP" <re***@newgrouponly.please> wrote in message
>>>> news:e3*************************@msnews.microsoft. com...
>>>>> When running my asp.net hosting service (asp.net without IIS),
>>>>> on server 2003 with IIS not installed, I get the following when
>>>>> trying to process a request. "System.DllNotFoundException:
>>>>> Unable to load DLL (aspnet_isapi.dll)."
>>>>>
>>>>> Of course the dll is able to be found, it's still in the
>>>>> framework directory and for grins I even put it in my service's
>>>>> local directory. This is apparantly server 2003 not allowing
>>>>> asp.net to be run if IIS was not installed. Is there any way
>>>>> around this?
>>>>>
>>>>> This works on win2000, xp with and without IIS, and on server
>>>>> 2003 with IIS.
>>>>>
re: try using that servicepack you posted on server 2003 (not itanium or x64), it will tell
you it can't install
Really ? I wonder how I managed to do just that.
re: Juan please put your theories to the test...
I'm glad to... check it out : http://asp.net.do/test/version3.aspx
Juan T. Llibre, ASP.NET MVP
ASP.NET FAQ : http://asp.net.do/faq/
ASPNETFAQ.COM : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
Foros de ASP.NET en Espaņol : http://asp.net.do/foros/
======================================
"EP" <re***@newgrouponly.please> wrote in message
news:e3*************************@msnews.microsoft. com... What does he need to think about?
Juan please put your theories to the test...
Install server 2003 without IIS and try cassini, it won't work
try using that servicepack you posted on server 2003 (not itanium or x64), it will tell
you it can't install
Think again, and then post again.
See the reply just sent to EP's post.
Juan T. Llibre, ASP.NET MVP
ASP.NET FAQ : http://asp.net.do/faq/
ASPNETFAQ.COM : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
Foros de ASP.NET en Espaņol : http://asp.net.do/foros/
======================================
<ri**********@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:11**********************@g49g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com...
Ha! That was a very funny, and enlightening thread. Juan, you really
have to think before you post. You're an ASP.NET MVP for pity's sake,
so before you start being a smart-ass do some extra research.
EP wrote:
Well juan, I posted a problem and the resulting solution. I'm not
sure why you refuse to accept my first-hand experience. Have you
tried it?
ok, i'll try this one last time... I posted the link twice.... in fact it's
even in your quoted reply!!!! You have reposted the title and link numerous
times in the quoted sections.....
Microsoft .NET Framework 1.1 Service Pack 1 for Windows Server 2003 http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...displaylang=en
If you look on that page...
Supported Operating Systems: Windows Server 2003 You *still* have not answered my question :
Where is the "special" sp1 edition for server 2003 standard edition ?
You stated that : the sp1 redistributable for .net 1.1 has a different redistributable
file for server 2003.
Where can that "special" SP1 edition be downloaded ?
Since you had, also, stated that :
i am operating on facts and first-hand experience.
Could you tell us where you got that "first-hand experience" from ?
Where did you download the "special" SP1 for Windows 2003 Standard
Edition ?
Juan T. Llibre, ASP.NET MVP
ASP.NET FAQ : http://asp.net.do/faq/
ASPNETFAQ.COM : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
Foros de ASP.NET en Espaņol : http://asp.net.do/foros/
======================================
"EP" <re***@newgrouponly.please> wrote in message
news:e3*************************@msnews.microsoft. com... I'm not sure why you refuse to accept my first-hand experience.
Because I can't stand incorrect information being disseminated ?
which incorrect information?
the sp1 redistributable for .net 1.1 has a different
redistributable file for server 2003.
That's plainly incorrect.
?
Ok, i'll be more specific. I am running server 2003 standard
edition.
OK, where is the "special" sp1 edition for server 2003 standard
edition ?
my god...
Microsoft .NET Framework 1.1 Service Pack 1 for Windows Server 2003
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...d=AE7EDEF7-2CB
7-4864-8623-A1038563DF23&displaylang=en
If you look at the operating sysems on that page, it lists "Windows
server 2003". It is for all version of server 2003 other than the
special editions you listed.
re:
"It almost seems you have some religious belief about the way that
asp.net works on server 2003 and the way the service pack is
distributed."
I'll skip answering that.
When you find a special sp1 edition for
server 2003 standard edition, I might change my mind.
Juan T. Llibre, ASP.NET MVP
ASP.NET FAQ : http://asp.net.do/faq/
ASPNETFAQ.COM : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
Foros de ASP.NET en Espaņol : http://asp.net.do/foros/
======================================
"EP" <re***@newgrouponly.please> wrote in message
news:e3*************************@msnews.microsoft. com...
Well juan, I posted a problem and the resulting solution. I'm not
sure why you refuse to accept my first-hand experience. Have you
tried it? I'm also not sure why you feel it necessary to try to
prove me wrong in a situation that you have no experience in. It
almost seems you have some religious belief about the way that
asp.net works on server 2003 and the way the service pack is
distributed. I'm very sorry if I've disappointed you, and didn't
mean to make your belief system come crashing down.
>> the sp1 redistributable for .net 1.1 has a different
>> redistributable file for server 2003.
>>
> It does ?
>
Yes it does.
Microsoft .NET Framework 1.1 Service Pack 1 for Windows Server 2003
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...yid=AE7EDEF7-2
CB 7-4864-8623-A1038563DF23&displaylang=en
> http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...lyid=a8f5654f-
> 08 8e -40b2-bbdb-a83353618b38&displaylang=en
>
> says differently...
>
You posted a list of special editions of server 2003, for x64 and
itanium.
Ok, i'll be more specific. I am running server 2003 standard
edition. I am not running
one of the special cases from your list....
Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 1 for Itanium-based Systems;
Windows
Server 2003, Datacenter Edition for 64-Bit Itanium-Based Systems;
Windows Server 2003, Datacenter x64 Edition; Windows Server 2003,
Enterprise Edition for Itanium-based Systems; Windows Server 2003,
Enterprise x64 Edition; Windows Server 2003, Standard x64 Edition;
> Maybe you're operating on assumptions, instead of facts ?
>
no, i am operating on facts and first-hand experience. I'm sorry
you assumed otherwise.
Thanks
-Eric
> re:
>
>> the sp1 redistributable for .net 1.1 has a different
>> redistributable file for server 2003.
>>
> It does ?
>
> http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...lyid=a8f5654f-
> 08 8e -40b2-bbdb-a83353618b38&displaylang=en
>
> says differently...
>
> "Supported Operating Systems: TabletPC; Windows 2000; Windows 2000
> Advanced Server;
> Windows 2000 Professional Edition ; Windows 2000 Server; Windows
> 2000
> Service Pack 2;
> Windows 2000 Service Pack 3; Windows 2000 Service Pack 4; Windows
> 98;
> Windows 98
> Second Edition; Windows ME; Windows NT; Windows Server 2003
> Service
> Pack 1 for
> Itanium-based Systems; Windows Server 2003, Datacenter Edition for
> 64-Bit Itanium-Based
> Systems; Windows Server 2003, Datacenter x64 Edition; Windows
> Server
> 2003, Enterprise
> Edition for Itanium-based Systems; Windows Server 2003, Enterprise
> x64
> Edition; Windows
> Server 2003, Standard x64 Edition; Windows XP; Windows XP 64-bit;
> Windows XP for
> Itanium-based Systems Version 2003; Windows XP Home Edition ;
> Windows
> XP Media
> Center Edition; Windows XP Professional 64-Bit Edition (Itanium) ;
> Windows XP Professional
> 64-Bit Edition (Itanium) 2003; Windows XP Professional Edition ;
> Windows XP Service Pack
> 1;
> Windows XP Service Pack 2."
> All operating system get the same .Net Framework's SP1.
> Maybe you're operating on assumptions, instead of facts ?
> Juan T. Llibre, ASP.NET MVP
> ASP.NET FAQ : http://asp.net.do/faq/
> ASPNETFAQ.COM : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
> Foros de ASP.NET en Espaņol : http://asp.net.do/foros/
> ======================================
> "EP" <re***@newgrouponly.please> wrote in message
> news:e3*************************@msnews.microsoft. com...
>> Yes, that is what one would think. But in reality, server 2003
>> is
>> different.
>> aspnet_regiis apparantly does some registry settings or sets
>> other
>> switches which the
>> asp.net framework looks for while on 2003.
>> And yes, one would think that aspnet_regiis wouldn't have any
>> effect
>> if iis is not
>> there, but it does.
>>> If your web server is based on Cassini, it should run asp.net
>>> files out of the box.
>>>
>> one would think so, But it doesn't. The .net framework behaves
>> differently on server 2003, which is why the sp1 redistributable
>> for .net 1.1 has a different redistributable file for server
>> 2003.
>>
>> while it's counter-intuitive, put very simply... if you uninstall
>> IIS and no not run aspnet_regiis, you get
>> DllNotFound(asp_isapi.dll). Once you run aspnet_regiis, it works.
>>
>>> re:
>>>
>>>> If anyone else has this problem, simply run aspnet_regiis with
>>>> IIS uninstalled, and your asp.net runtime will start working
>>>> again.
>>>>
>>> Huh ?
>>>
>>> Didn't you say that you are *not* running IIS ?
>>> As its name indicates, aspnet_regiis registers asp.net with IIS!
>>> If there's no IIS, it can't register asp.net with it.
>>> re:
>>>> In response to Juan, yes our service hosts it's own web server
>>>> which was loosly based on cassini, and exposes web services.
>>>>
>>> I figured as much.
>>> I don't understand how aspnet_regiis can register it with your
>>> web
>>> server, though.
>>> If your web server is based on Cassini, it should run asp.net
>>> files
>>> out of the box.
>>> Juan T. Llibre, ASP.NET MVP
>>> ASP.NET FAQ : http://asp.net.do/faq/
>>> ASPNETFAQ.COM : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
>>> Foros de ASP.NET en Espaņol : http://asp.net.do/foros/
>>> ======================================
>>> "EP" <re***@newgrouponly.please> wrote in message
>>> news:e3*************************@msnews.microsoft. com...
>>>> Well I've been working on this since yesterday, and found the
>>>> solution about 10 minutes
>>>> after posting here!!!
>>>> If anyone else has this problem, simply run aspnet_regiis with
>>>> IIS
>>>> uninstalled, and your
>>>> asp.net runtime will start working again.
>>>> In response to Juan, yes our service hosts it's own web server
>>>> which
>>>> was loosly based on cassini, and exposes web services.
>>>> Hello Juan,
>>>>> If you can get ASP.NET to run without IIS having been
>>>>> installed, unless you are running another web server which can
>>>>> host the ASP.NET processes, like Cassini, I'll give you a
>>>>> medal.
>>>>>
>>>>> How do you expect ASP.NET to run, if not on IIS ? Did you
>>>>> write a web server for ASP.NET to run on ? re:
>>>>>
>>>>>> for grins I even put it in my service's local directory
>>>>>>
>>>>> I find that illogical actions are not a source of humor. OTOH,
>>>>> I grin at what you attempted to do... ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Juan T. Llibre, ASP.NET MVP
>>>>> ASP.NET FAQ : http://asp.net.do/faq/
>>>>> ASPNETFAQ.COM : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
>>>>> Foros de ASP.NET en Espaņol : http://asp.net.do/foros/
>>>>> ======================================
>>>>> "EP" <re***@newgrouponly.please> wrote in message
>>>>> news:e3*************************@msnews.microsoft. com...
>>>>>> When running my asp.net hosting service (asp.net without
>>>>>> IIS), on server 2003 with IIS not installed, I get the
>>>>>> following when trying to process a request.
>>>>>> "System.DllNotFoundException: Unable to load DLL
>>>>>> (aspnet_isapi.dll)."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Of course the dll is able to be found, it's still in the
>>>>>> framework directory and for grins I even put it in my
>>>>>> service's local directory. This is apparantly server 2003
>>>>>> not allowing asp.net to be run if IIS was not installed. Is
>>>>>> there any way around this?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This works on win2000, xp with and without IIS, and on server
>>>>>> 2003 with IIS.
>>>>>>
>> Juan please put your theories to the test... I'm glad to... check it out : http://asp.net.do/test/version3.aspx
As we've been discussing framework 1.1 sp1, i'm surprised you posted an example
of the 2.0 framework working without IIS.
Ok, that page showed that you were running .net 2.0. The windows component
option (under add/remove programs) for asp.net installs and uninstalls asp.net
v1.1.4322. Uninstall that component and look at what happens to the following
registry key.
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\ASP.NET
you will see that the registry entry for v1.1.4322 is deleted, so uninstalling
IIS, which requires unchecking the asp.net component as well, removes asp.net
1.1.4322. The 2.0 framework does not have this tie into the server 2003
add/remove programs component.
Juan T. Llibre, ASP.NET MVP
ASP.NET FAQ : http://asp.net.do/faq/
ASPNETFAQ.COM : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
Foros de ASP.NET en Espaņol : http://asp.net.do/foros/
======================================
"EP" <re***@newgrouponly.please> wrote in message
news:e3*************************@msnews.microsoft. com... What does he need to think about?
Juan please put your theories to the test...
Install server 2003 without IIS and try cassini, it won't work
try using that servicepack you posted on server 2003 (not itanium or
x64), it will tell
you it can't install Think again, and then post again.
See the reply just sent to EP's post.
Juan T. Llibre, ASP.NET MVP
ASP.NET FAQ : http://asp.net.do/faq/
ASPNETFAQ.COM : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
Foros de ASP.NET en Espaņol : http://asp.net.do/foros/
======================================
<ri**********@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:11**********************@g49g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com...
Ha! That was a very funny, and enlightening thread. Juan, you
really
have to think before you post. You're an ASP.NET MVP for pity's
sake,
so before you start being a smart-ass do some extra research.
EP wrote:
Well juan, I posted a problem and the resulting solution. I'm not
sure why you refuse to accept my first-hand experience. Have you
tried it?
if you really don't believe me or the download page about the sp1 version
for windows 2003, look at Aaron Stebner's blog (he's on the windows MCE team
at microsoft)... I hope you will accept the download page and his information... http://blogs.msdn.com/astebner/archi...17/259314.aspx
There are separate versions of SP1 - one for Windows Server 2003 and another
one for other Windows versions. The Windows Server 2003 version is available
in 18 languages, the other version is available in 22 languages. Do these
SP languages only apply to the setup UI or also to the framework bits (language
DLLs)?
There are a couple of really good points here that I forgot to address in
yesterday's post.
The first point is how the version of the .NET Framework 1.1 that is included
as part of the Windows Server 2003 OS compares and contrasts to the redistributable
version installed by dotnetfx.exe. Key points here are the following:
ˇ The .NET Framework 1.1 is installed by the OS optional component
manager technology (OCM) using an INF file and sysocmgr.exe when installing
or upgrading to Windows Server 2003.
ˇ The English language version of Windows Server 2003 contains the
equivalent of the bits installed by the v1.1 dotnetfx.exe.
ˇ The non-English versions of Windows Server 2003 contain the equivalent
of the bits installed by the v1.1 dotnetfx.exe and the bits installed by
the matching language of the v1.1 langpack.exe.
ˇ If you try to install the v1.1 dotnetfx.exe on Windows Server 2003,
it will block you from doing so with a message saying that it is already
part of the OS.
ˇ If you try to install the matching language of the v1.1 langpack.exe
on a non-English Windows Server 2003, it will block you from doing so with
a message saying that it is already part of the OS.
ˇ If you try to install a non-matching language of the v1.1 langpack.exe
on Windows Server 2003 it will install like on any other OS.
The second point is how the .NET Framework 1.1 service packs are packaged
and delivered. Because the version delivered by dotnetfx.exe is MSI-based
and the version delivered by Windows Server 2003 is OCM-based, there are
2 separate service packs - one targeting each installation technology. If
you use Windows Update to install .NET Framework 1.1 SP1, you should only
be offered one of the packages though, because Windows Update will examine
the OS you are running on and offer you only the package that applies to it.
Also, the .NET Framework 1.1 shipped in 22 languages, but Windows Server
2003 only shipped in 18 languages. That is why you see a discrepancy in
the number of languages offered for each service pack. The bits that are
patched by the two different sets of 1.1 service packs is identical. re:
my god...
You *still* have not answered my question :
Where is the "special" sp1 edition for server 2003 standard edition ?
You stated that :
the sp1 redistributable for .net 1.1 has a different redistributable
file for server 2003.
Where can that "special" SP1 edition be downloaded ?
Since you had, also, stated that :
i am operating on facts and first-hand experience.
Could you tell us where you got that "first-hand experience" from ?
Where did you download the "special" SP1 for Windows 2003 Standard
Edition ?
Juan T. Llibre, ASP.NET MVP
ASP.NET FAQ : http://asp.net.do/faq/
ASPNETFAQ.COM : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
Foros de ASP.NET en Espaņol : http://asp.net.do/foros/
======================================
"EP" <re***@newgrouponly.please> wrote in message
news:e3*************************@msnews.microsoft. com... I'm not sure why you refuse to accept my first-hand experience.
Because I can't stand incorrect information being disseminated ?
which incorrect information?
the sp1 redistributable for .net 1.1 has a different
redistributable file for server 2003.
That's plainly incorrect.
?
Ok, i'll be more specific. I am running server 2003 standard
edition.
OK, where is the "special" sp1 edition for server 2003 standard
edition ?
my god...
Microsoft .NET Framework 1.1 Service Pack 1 for Windows Server 2003
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...d=AE7EDEF7-2CB
7-4864-8623-A1038563DF23&displaylang=en
If you look at the operating sysems on that page, it lists "Windows
server 2003". It is for all version of server 2003 other than the
special editions you listed.
re:
"It almost seems you have some religious belief about the way that
asp.net works on server 2003 and the way the service pack is
distributed."
I'll skip answering that.
When you find a special sp1 edition for
server 2003 standard edition, I might change my mind.
Juan T. Llibre, ASP.NET MVP
ASP.NET FAQ : http://asp.net.do/faq/
ASPNETFAQ.COM : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
Foros de ASP.NET en Espaņol : http://asp.net.do/foros/
======================================
"EP" <re***@newgrouponly.please> wrote in message
news:e3*************************@msnews.microsoft. com...
Well juan, I posted a problem and the resulting solution. I'm not
sure why you refuse to accept my first-hand experience. Have you
tried it? I'm also not sure why you feel it necessary to try to
prove me wrong in a situation that you have no experience in. It
almost seems you have some religious belief about the way that
asp.net works on server 2003 and the way the service pack is
distributed. I'm very sorry if I've disappointed you, and didn't
mean to make your belief system come crashing down.
>> the sp1 redistributable for .net 1.1 has a different
>> redistributable file for server 2003.
>>
> It does ?
>
Yes it does.
Microsoft .NET Framework 1.1 Service Pack 1 for Windows Server 2003
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...yid=AE7EDEF7-2
CB 7-4864-8623-A1038563DF23&displaylang=en
> http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...lyid=a8f5654f-
> 08 8e -40b2-bbdb-a83353618b38&displaylang=en
>
> says differently...
>
You posted a list of special editions of server 2003, for x64 and
itanium.
Ok, i'll be more specific. I am running server 2003 standard
edition. I am not running
one of the special cases from your list....
Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 1 for Itanium-based Systems;
Windows
Server 2003, Datacenter Edition for 64-Bit Itanium-Based Systems;
Windows Server 2003, Datacenter x64 Edition; Windows Server 2003,
Enterprise Edition for Itanium-based Systems; Windows Server 2003,
Enterprise x64 Edition; Windows Server 2003, Standard x64 Edition;
> Maybe you're operating on assumptions, instead of facts ?
>
no, i am operating on facts and first-hand experience. I'm sorry
you assumed otherwise.
Thanks
-Eric
> re:
>
>> the sp1 redistributable for .net 1.1 has a different
>> redistributable file for server 2003.
>>
> It does ?
>
> http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...lyid=a8f5654f-
> 08 8e -40b2-bbdb-a83353618b38&displaylang=en
>
> says differently...
>
> "Supported Operating Systems: TabletPC; Windows 2000; Windows 2000
> Advanced Server;
> Windows 2000 Professional Edition ; Windows 2000 Server; Windows
> 2000
> Service Pack 2;
> Windows 2000 Service Pack 3; Windows 2000 Service Pack 4; Windows
> 98;
> Windows 98
> Second Edition; Windows ME; Windows NT; Windows Server 2003
> Service
> Pack 1 for
> Itanium-based Systems; Windows Server 2003, Datacenter Edition for
> 64-Bit Itanium-Based
> Systems; Windows Server 2003, Datacenter x64 Edition; Windows
> Server
> 2003, Enterprise
> Edition for Itanium-based Systems; Windows Server 2003, Enterprise
> x64
> Edition; Windows
> Server 2003, Standard x64 Edition; Windows XP; Windows XP 64-bit;
> Windows XP for
> Itanium-based Systems Version 2003; Windows XP Home Edition ;
> Windows
> XP Media
> Center Edition; Windows XP Professional 64-Bit Edition (Itanium) ;
> Windows XP Professional
> 64-Bit Edition (Itanium) 2003; Windows XP Professional Edition ;
> Windows XP Service Pack
> 1;
> Windows XP Service Pack 2."
> All operating system get the same .Net Framework's SP1.
> Maybe you're operating on assumptions, instead of facts ?
> Juan T. Llibre, ASP.NET MVP
> ASP.NET FAQ : http://asp.net.do/faq/
> ASPNETFAQ.COM : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
> Foros de ASP.NET en Espaņol : http://asp.net.do/foros/
> ======================================
> "EP" <re***@newgrouponly.please> wrote in message
> news:e3*************************@msnews.microsoft. com...
>> Yes, that is what one would think. But in reality, server 2003
>> is
>> different.
>> aspnet_regiis apparantly does some registry settings or sets
>> other
>> switches which the
>> asp.net framework looks for while on 2003.
>> And yes, one would think that aspnet_regiis wouldn't have any
>> effect
>> if iis is not
>> there, but it does.
>>> If your web server is based on Cassini, it should run asp.net
>>> files out of the box.
>>>
>> one would think so, But it doesn't. The .net framework behaves
>> differently on server 2003, which is why the sp1 redistributable
>> for .net 1.1 has a different redistributable file for server
>> 2003.
>>
>> while it's counter-intuitive, put very simply... if you uninstall
>> IIS and no not run aspnet_regiis, you get
>> DllNotFound(asp_isapi.dll). Once you run aspnet_regiis, it works.
>>
>>> re:
>>>
>>>> If anyone else has this problem, simply run aspnet_regiis with
>>>> IIS uninstalled, and your asp.net runtime will start working
>>>> again.
>>>>
>>> Huh ?
>>>
>>> Didn't you say that you are *not* running IIS ?
>>> As its name indicates, aspnet_regiis registers asp.net with IIS!
>>> If there's no IIS, it can't register asp.net with it.
>>> re:
>>>> In response to Juan, yes our service hosts it's own web server
>>>> which was loosly based on cassini, and exposes web services.
>>>>
>>> I figured as much.
>>> I don't understand how aspnet_regiis can register it with your
>>> web
>>> server, though.
>>> If your web server is based on Cassini, it should run asp.net
>>> files
>>> out of the box.
>>> Juan T. Llibre, ASP.NET MVP
>>> ASP.NET FAQ : http://asp.net.do/faq/
>>> ASPNETFAQ.COM : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
>>> Foros de ASP.NET en Espaņol : http://asp.net.do/foros/
>>> ======================================
>>> "EP" <re***@newgrouponly.please> wrote in message
>>> news:e3*************************@msnews.microsoft. com...
>>>> Well I've been working on this since yesterday, and found the
>>>> solution about 10 minutes
>>>> after posting here!!!
>>>> If anyone else has this problem, simply run aspnet_regiis with
>>>> IIS
>>>> uninstalled, and your
>>>> asp.net runtime will start working again.
>>>> In response to Juan, yes our service hosts it's own web server
>>>> which
>>>> was loosly based on cassini, and exposes web services.
>>>> Hello Juan,
>>>>> If you can get ASP.NET to run without IIS having been
>>>>> installed, unless you are running another web server which can
>>>>> host the ASP.NET processes, like Cassini, I'll give you a
>>>>> medal.
>>>>>
>>>>> How do you expect ASP.NET to run, if not on IIS ? Did you
>>>>> write a web server for ASP.NET to run on ? re:
>>>>>
>>>>>> for grins I even put it in my service's local directory
>>>>>>
>>>>> I find that illogical actions are not a source of humor. OTOH,
>>>>> I grin at what you attempted to do... ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Juan T. Llibre, ASP.NET MVP
>>>>> ASP.NET FAQ : http://asp.net.do/faq/
>>>>> ASPNETFAQ.COM : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
>>>>> Foros de ASP.NET en Espaņol : http://asp.net.do/foros/
>>>>> ======================================
>>>>> "EP" <re***@newgrouponly.please> wrote in message
>>>>> news:e3*************************@msnews.microsoft. com...
>>>>>> When running my asp.net hosting service (asp.net without
>>>>>> IIS), on server 2003 with IIS not installed, I get the
>>>>>> following when trying to process a request.
>>>>>> "System.DllNotFoundException: Unable to load DLL
>>>>>> (aspnet_isapi.dll)."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Of course the dll is able to be found, it's still in the
>>>>>> framework directory and for grins I even put it in my
>>>>>> service's local directory. This is apparantly server 2003
>>>>>> not allowing asp.net to be run if IIS was not installed. Is
>>>>>> there any way around this?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This works on win2000, xp with and without IIS, and on server
>>>>>> 2003 with IIS.
>>>>>>
So Juan it's been fun, but I must leave this alone now. I wish you the best
of luck on your FAQ site, I'm sure your readers are getting very accurate
information. if you really don't believe me or the download page about the sp1
version for windows 2003, look at Aaron Stebner's blog (he's on the
windows MCE team at microsoft)... I hope you will accept the download
page and his information...
http://blogs.msdn.com/astebner/archi...17/259314.aspx
There are separate versions of SP1 - one for Windows Server 2003 and
another one for other Windows versions. The Windows Server 2003
version is available in 18 languages, the other version is available
in 22 languages. Do these SP languages only apply to the setup UI or
also to the framework bits (language DLLs)?
There are a couple of really good points here that I forgot to address
in yesterday's post.
The first point is how the version of the .NET Framework 1.1 that is
included as part of the Windows Server 2003 OS compares and contrasts
to the redistributable version installed by dotnetfx.exe. Key points
here are the following:
ˇ The .NET Framework 1.1 is installed by the OS optional
component manager technology (OCM) using an INF file and sysocmgr.exe
when installing or upgrading to Windows Server 2003.
ˇ The English language version of Windows Server 2003 contains
the equivalent of the bits installed by the v1.1 dotnetfx.exe.
ˇ The non-English versions of Windows Server 2003 contain the
equivalent of the bits installed by the v1.1 dotnetfx.exe and the bits
installed by the matching language of the v1.1 langpack.exe.
ˇ If you try to install the v1.1 dotnetfx.exe on Windows
Server 2003, it will block you from doing so with a message saying
that it is already part of the OS.
ˇ If you try to install the matching language of the v1.1
langpack.exe on a non-English Windows Server 2003, it will block you
from doing so with a message saying that it is already part of the OS.
ˇ If you try to install a non-matching language of the v1.1
langpack.exe on Windows Server 2003 it will install like on any other
OS.
The second point is how the .NET Framework 1.1 service packs are
packaged and delivered. Because the version delivered by dotnetfx.exe
is MSI-based and the version delivered by Windows Server 2003 is
OCM-based, there are 2 separate service packs - one targeting each
installation technology. If you use Windows Update to install .NET
Framework 1.1 SP1, you should only be offered one of the packages
though, because Windows Update will examine the OS you are running on
and offer you only the package that applies to it.
Also, the .NET Framework 1.1 shipped in 22 languages, but Windows
Server 2003 only shipped in 18 languages. That is why you see a
discrepancy in the number of languages offered for each service pack.
The bits that are patched by the two different sets of 1.1 service
packs is identical.
re:
my god...
You *still* have not answered my question :
Where is the "special" sp1 edition for server 2003 standard edition ?
You stated that :
the sp1 redistributable for .net 1.1 has a different redistributable
file for server 2003.
Where can that "special" SP1 edition be downloaded ?
Since you had, also, stated that :
i am operating on facts and first-hand experience.
Could you tell us where you got that "first-hand experience" from ?
Where did you download the "special" SP1 for Windows 2003 Standard
Edition ?
Juan T. Llibre, ASP.NET MVP
ASP.NET FAQ : http://asp.net.do/faq/
ASPNETFAQ.COM : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
Foros de ASP.NET en Espaņol : http://asp.net.do/foros/
======================================
"EP" <re***@newgrouponly.please> wrote in message
news:e3*************************@msnews.microsoft. com...> I'm not sure why you refuse to accept my first-hand experience.
>
Because I can't stand incorrect information being disseminated ?
which incorrect information?
> the sp1 redistributable for .net 1.1 has a different
> redistributable file for server 2003.
>
That's plainly incorrect.
?
> Ok, i'll be more specific. I am running server 2003 standard
> edition.
>
OK, where is the "special" sp1 edition for server 2003 standard
edition ?
my god...
Microsoft .NET Framework 1.1 Service Pack 1 for Windows Server 2003
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...id=AE7EDEF7-2C
B 7-4864-8623-A1038563DF23&displaylang=en
If you look at the operating sysems on that page, it lists "Windows
server 2003". It is for all version of server 2003 other than the
special editions you listed.
re:
> "It almost seems you have some religious belief about the way
> that asp.net works on server 2003 and the way the service pack is
> distributed."
>
I'll skip answering that.
When you find a special sp1 edition for
server 2003 standard edition, I might change my mind.
Juan T. Llibre, ASP.NET MVP
ASP.NET FAQ : http://asp.net.do/faq/
ASPNETFAQ.COM : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
Foros de ASP.NET en Espaņol : http://asp.net.do/foros/
======================================
"EP" <re***@newgrouponly.please> wrote in message
news:e3*************************@msnews.microsoft. com...
> Well juan, I posted a problem and the resulting solution. I'm not
> sure why you refuse to accept my first-hand experience. Have you
> tried it? I'm also not sure why you feel it necessary to try to
> prove me wrong in a situation that you have no experience in. It
> almost seems you have some religious belief about the way that
> asp.net works on server 2003 and the way the service pack is
> distributed. I'm very sorry if I've disappointed you, and didn't
> mean to make your belief system come crashing down.
>
>>> the sp1 redistributable for .net 1.1 has a different
>>> redistributable file for server 2003.
>>>
>> It does ?
>>
> Yes it does.
>
> Microsoft .NET Framework 1.1 Service Pack 1 for Windows Server
> 2003
>
> http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...lyid=AE7EDEF7-
> 2 CB 7-4864-8623-A1038563DF23&displaylang=en
>
>> http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...ilyid=a8f5654f
>> - 08 8e -40b2-bbdb-a83353618b38&displaylang=en
>>
>> says differently...
>>
> You posted a list of special editions of server 2003, for x64 and
> itanium.
> Ok, i'll be more specific. I am running server 2003 standard
> edition. I am not running
> one of the special cases from your list....
> Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 1 for Itanium-based Systems;
> Windows
> Server 2003, Datacenter Edition for 64-Bit Itanium-Based Systems;
> Windows Server 2003, Datacenter x64 Edition; Windows Server 2003,
> Enterprise Edition for Itanium-based Systems; Windows Server 2003,
> Enterprise x64 Edition; Windows Server 2003, Standard x64 Edition;
>> Maybe you're operating on assumptions, instead of facts ?
>>
> no, i am operating on facts and first-hand experience. I'm sorry
> you assumed otherwise.
>
> Thanks
> -Eric
>> re:
>>
>>> the sp1 redistributable for .net 1.1 has a different
>>> redistributable file for server 2003.
>>>
>> It does ?
>>
>> http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...ilyid=a8f5654f
>> - 08 8e -40b2-bbdb-a83353618b38&displaylang=en
>>
>> says differently...
>>
>> "Supported Operating Systems: TabletPC; Windows 2000; Windows
>> 2000
>> Advanced Server;
>> Windows 2000 Professional Edition ; Windows 2000 Server; Windows
>> 2000
>> Service Pack 2;
>> Windows 2000 Service Pack 3; Windows 2000 Service Pack 4; Windows
>> 98;
>> Windows 98
>> Second Edition; Windows ME; Windows NT; Windows Server 2003
>> Service
>> Pack 1 for
>> Itanium-based Systems; Windows Server 2003, Datacenter Edition
>> for
>> 64-Bit Itanium-Based
>> Systems; Windows Server 2003, Datacenter x64 Edition; Windows
>> Server
>> 2003, Enterprise
>> Edition for Itanium-based Systems; Windows Server 2003,
>> Enterprise
>> x64
>> Edition; Windows
>> Server 2003, Standard x64 Edition; Windows XP; Windows XP 64-bit;
>> Windows XP for
>> Itanium-based Systems Version 2003; Windows XP Home Edition ;
>> Windows
>> XP Media
>> Center Edition; Windows XP Professional 64-Bit Edition (Itanium)
>> ;
>> Windows XP Professional
>> 64-Bit Edition (Itanium) 2003; Windows XP Professional Edition ;
>> Windows XP Service Pack
>> 1;
>> Windows XP Service Pack 2."
>> All operating system get the same .Net Framework's SP1.
>> Maybe you're operating on assumptions, instead of facts ?
>> Juan T. Llibre, ASP.NET MVP
>> ASP.NET FAQ : http://asp.net.do/faq/
>> ASPNETFAQ.COM : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
>> Foros de ASP.NET en Espaņol : http://asp.net.do/foros/
>> ======================================
>> "EP" <re***@newgrouponly.please> wrote in message
>> news:e3*************************@msnews.microsoft. com...
>>> Yes, that is what one would think. But in reality, server 2003
>>> is
>>> different.
>>> aspnet_regiis apparantly does some registry settings or sets
>>> other
>>> switches which the
>>> asp.net framework looks for while on 2003.
>>> And yes, one would think that aspnet_regiis wouldn't have any
>>> effect
>>> if iis is not
>>> there, but it does.
>>>> If your web server is based on Cassini, it should run asp.net
>>>> files out of the box.
>>>>
>>> one would think so, But it doesn't. The .net framework behaves
>>> differently on server 2003, which is why the sp1 redistributable
>>> for .net 1.1 has a different redistributable file for server
>>> 2003.
>>>
>>> while it's counter-intuitive, put very simply... if you
>>> uninstall IIS and no not run aspnet_regiis, you get
>>> DllNotFound(asp_isapi.dll). Once you run aspnet_regiis, it
>>> works.
>>>
>>>> re:
>>>>
>>>>> If anyone else has this problem, simply run aspnet_regiis with
>>>>> IIS uninstalled, and your asp.net runtime will start working
>>>>> again.
>>>>>
>>>> Huh ?
>>>>
>>>> Didn't you say that you are *not* running IIS ?
>>>> As its name indicates, aspnet_regiis registers asp.net with
>>>> IIS!
>>>> If there's no IIS, it can't register asp.net with it.
>>>> re:
>>>>> In response to Juan, yes our service hosts it's own web server
>>>>> which was loosly based on cassini, and exposes web services.
>>>>>
>>>> I figured as much.
>>>> I don't understand how aspnet_regiis can register it with your
>>>> web
>>>> server, though.
>>>> If your web server is based on Cassini, it should run asp.net
>>>> files
>>>> out of the box.
>>>> Juan T. Llibre, ASP.NET MVP
>>>> ASP.NET FAQ : http://asp.net.do/faq/
>>>> ASPNETFAQ.COM : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
>>>> Foros de ASP.NET en Espaņol : http://asp.net.do/foros/
>>>> ======================================
>>>> "EP" <re***@newgrouponly.please> wrote in message
>>>> news:e3*************************@msnews.microsoft. com...
>>>>> Well I've been working on this since yesterday, and found the
>>>>> solution about 10 minutes
>>>>> after posting here!!!
>>>>> If anyone else has this problem, simply run aspnet_regiis with
>>>>> IIS
>>>>> uninstalled, and your
>>>>> asp.net runtime will start working again.
>>>>> In response to Juan, yes our service hosts it's own web server
>>>>> which
>>>>> was loosly based on cassini, and exposes web services.
>>>>> Hello Juan,
>>>>>> If you can get ASP.NET to run without IIS having been
>>>>>> installed, unless you are running another web server which
>>>>>> can host the ASP.NET processes, like Cassini, I'll give you a
>>>>>> medal.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How do you expect ASP.NET to run, if not on IIS ? Did you
>>>>>> write a web server for ASP.NET to run on ? re:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> for grins I even put it in my service's local directory
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> I find that illogical actions are not a source of humor.
>>>>>> OTOH, I grin at what you attempted to do... ;-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Juan T. Llibre, ASP.NET MVP
>>>>>> ASP.NET FAQ : http://asp.net.do/faq/
>>>>>> ASPNETFAQ.COM : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
>>>>>> Foros de ASP.NET en Espaņol : http://asp.net.do/foros/
>>>>>> ======================================
>>>>>> "EP" <re***@newgrouponly.please> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:e3*************************@msnews.microsoft. com...
>>>>>>> When running my asp.net hosting service (asp.net without
>>>>>>> IIS), on server 2003 with IIS not installed, I get the
>>>>>>> following when trying to process a request.
>>>>>>> "System.DllNotFoundException: Unable to load DLL
>>>>>>> (aspnet_isapi.dll)."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Of course the dll is able to be found, it's still in the
>>>>>>> framework directory and for grins I even put it in my
>>>>>>> service's local directory. This is apparantly server 2003
>>>>>>> not allowing asp.net to be run if IIS was not installed. Is
>>>>>>> there any way around this?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This works on win2000, xp with and without IIS, and on
>>>>>>> server 2003 with IIS.
>>>>>>> try using that servicepack you posted on server 2003 (not itanium or
x64), it will tell you it can't install
Really ? I wonder how I managed to do just that.
Please don't lie to the community. That is impossible to do.
Juan this will be my last post... please feel free to do some research.
Here is from a microsoft employee's blog.
The first point is how the version of the .NET Framework 1.1 that is included
as part of the Windows Server 2003 OS compares and contrasts to the redistributable
version installed by dotnetfx.exe. Key points here are the following:
ˇ The .NET Framework 1.1 is installed by the OS optional component
manager technology (OCM) using an INF file and sysocmgr.exe when installing
or upgrading to Windows Server 2003.
ˇ The English language version of Windows Server 2003 contains the
equivalent of the bits installed by the v1.1 dotnetfx.exe.
ˇ The non-English versions of Windows Server 2003 contain the equivalent
of the bits installed by the v1.1 dotnetfx.exe and the bits installed by
the matching language of the v1.1 langpack.exe.
ˇ If you try to install the v1.1 dotnetfx.exe on Windows Server 2003,
it will block you from doing so with a message saying that it is already
part of the OS.
ˇ If you try to install the matching language of the v1.1 langpack.exe
on a non-English Windows Server 2003, it will block you from doing so with
a message saying that it is already part of the OS.
ˇ If you try to install a non-matching language of the v1.1 langpack.exe
on Windows Server 2003 it will install like on any other OS.
The second point is how the .NET Framework 1.1 service packs are packaged
and delivered. Because the version delivered by dotnetfx.exe is MSI-based
and the version delivered by Windows Server 2003 is OCM-based, there are
2 separate service packs - one targeting each installation technology. If
you use Windows Update to install .NET Framework 1.1 SP1, you should only
be offered one of the packages though, because Windows Update will examine
the OS you are running on and offer you only the package that applies to it.
Juan please put your theories to the test...
I'm glad to... check it out : http://asp.net.do/test/version3.aspx
Juan T. Llibre, ASP.NET MVP
ASP.NET FAQ : http://asp.net.do/faq/
ASPNETFAQ.COM : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
Foros de ASP.NET en Espaņol : http://asp.net.do/foros/
======================================
"EP" <re***@newgrouponly.please> wrote in message
news:e3*************************@msnews.microsoft. com... What does he need to think about?
Juan please put your theories to the test...
Install server 2003 without IIS and try cassini, it won't work
try using that servicepack you posted on server 2003 (not itanium or
x64), it will tell
you it can't install Think again, and then post again.
See the reply just sent to EP's post.
Juan T. Llibre, ASP.NET MVP
ASP.NET FAQ : http://asp.net.do/faq/
ASPNETFAQ.COM : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
Foros de ASP.NET en Espaņol : http://asp.net.do/foros/
======================================
<ri**********@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:11**********************@g49g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com...
Ha! That was a very funny, and enlightening thread. Juan, you
really
have to think before you post. You're an ASP.NET MVP for pity's
sake,
so before you start being a smart-ass do some extra research.
EP wrote:
Well juan, I posted a problem and the resulting solution. I'm not
sure why you refuse to accept my first-hand experience. Have you
tried it?
Cheap shot...
Juan T. Llibre, ASP.NET MVP
ASP.NET FAQ : http://asp.net.do/faq/
ASPNETFAQ.COM : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
Foros de ASP.NET en Espaņol : http://asp.net.do/foros/
======================================
"EP" <re***@newgrouponly.please> wrote in message
news:e3*************************@msnews.microsoft. com... So Juan it's been fun, but I must leave this alone now. I wish you the best of luck on
your FAQ site, I'm sure your readers are getting very accurate information.
Well, better men that me have been mistaken before.
What I don't do is take cheap shots like the one EP just posted.
Juan T. Llibre, ASP.NET MVP
ASP.NET FAQ : http://asp.net.do/faq/
ASPNETFAQ.COM : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
Foros de ASP.NET en Espaņol : http://asp.net.do/foros/
======================================
"Greg Burns" <bl*******@newsgroups.nospam> wrote in message
news:e9*************@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl... Just tried installing these on my Windows Server 2003 (no sp applied) that still needed
updated to settle this friendly debate. :^)
Microsoft .NET Framework 1.1 Service Pack 1
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...displaylang=en
The above would NOT install. Error attached.
Then I tried installing this one:
Microsoft .NET Framework 1.1 Service Pack 1 for Windows Server 2003
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...displaylang=en
This one installed OK.
<ducks to avoid the backlash>
Greg
This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics
by: David Rose |
last post by:
Does the Oracle work with Windows Server 2003 and .NET? I am trying to run
an ASP.NET app and keep getting the error "System.DllNotFoundException:
Unable to load DLL (OraOps9.dll)". The dll in in...
|
by: nagarajan.palanisamy |
last post by:
Hello,
We developed a DLL using C++ and I am calling the methods on the DLL
using p/Invoke from managed code. The application runs well both as a
console application and as a Windows Service...
|
by: Anna |
last post by:
When I run a c#DotNet web service, I have the following error:
System.DllNotFoundException: Unable to load DLL
The dll that cannot be loaded is a C dll. That's why it cannot be put in
the GAC....
|
by: Steve Richter |
last post by:
I am trying, really trying to use the DB2Connection class provided by
IBM to connect to a database on my old reliable as400 from the asp.net
web page.
When I run the DB2Connection code in my...
|
by: Yogesh Ketkar |
last post by:
I have a asp .net application talking to some remoting objects.
application hosting remoting objects runs on the same machine.
From a last couple of days I have started getting...
|
by: bunnyjoshi |
last post by:
"An unhandled exception of type 'System.StackOverflowException' occurred in asset.dll"
Above error is occuring when i m debugging my code.
asset.dll is file which is created by me n i m using it...
|
by: taleden |
last post by:
Hi,
- I'm trying to load a large file (about 300MB) using pickle.load().
- The file contains a PyMl classifier object
- When I load the file on my PC it works fine (with an XP operating system)....
|
by: emmanuelkatto |
last post by:
Hi All, I am Emmanuel katto from Uganda. I want to ask what challenges you've faced while migrating a website to cloud.
Please let me know.
Thanks!
Emmanuel
|
by: BarryA |
last post by:
What are the essential steps and strategies outlined in the Data Structures and Algorithms (DSA) roadmap for aspiring data scientists? How can individuals effectively utilize this roadmap to progress...
|
by: Sonnysonu |
last post by:
This is the data of csv file
1 2 3
1 2 3
1 2 3
1 2 3
2 3
2 3
3
the lengths should be different i have to store the data by column-wise with in the specific length.
suppose the i have to...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
There are some requirements for setting up RAID:
1. The motherboard and BIOS support RAID configuration.
2. The motherboard has 2 or more available SATA protocol SSD/HDD slots (including MSATA, M.2...
|
by: marktang |
last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However,...
|
by: Oralloy |
last post by:
Hello folks,
I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>".
The problem is that using the GNU compilers,...
|
by: jinu1996 |
last post by:
In today's digital age, having a compelling online presence is paramount for businesses aiming to thrive in a competitive landscape. At the heart of this digital strategy lies an intricately woven...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Overview:
Windows 11 and 10 have less user interface control over operating system update behaviour than previous versions of Windows. In Windows 11 and 10, there is no way to turn off the Windows...
|
by: isladogs |
last post by:
The next Access Europe User Group meeting will be on Wednesday 1 May 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC+1) and finishing by 19:30 (7.30PM).
In this session, we are pleased to welcome a new...
| | |
