That sounds fine.
I'd be wary of calling it a "wrapper", though,
to prevent confusion between that and Interop.
Juan T. Llibre
ASP.NET MVP
http://asp.net.do/foros/
Foros de ASP.NET en Espaņol
Ven, y hablemos de ASP.NET...
======================
"Vishnu-Chivukula" <VishnuChivukula@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
message news:CB7856F3-0968-4DF3-A86A-0FB401ED1724@microsoft.com...[color=blue]
> Hi,
>
> As Manohar pointed out, you can add a class to your project and proceed.
>
>
> Another way would be to create a wrapper class for the methods provided by
> the framework. Make an assembly (a .dll file) and reference it. This is in
> case you have a 3 tier architecture and needs to access the data access
> methods a lot..
>
> A sample can be like this...
>
> Create a static class like DataBase and have a private static connection
> string
>
> private static string sConnectionString = The connection string
>
> You can then have methods like this for filling up datatable / dataset.
> You
> can also have for ExecuteNonQuery and any others you need.
>
> public static DataTable ExecuteDataTable(SqlCommand command)
> {
> using (SqlDataAdapter da = new SqlDataAdapter(command))
> {
> command.Connection = GetConnection();
> DataTable dt = new DataTable();
> da.Fill(dt);
> return dt;
> }
> }
>
> Just another approach...
>
> HTH,
>
> Need any help, do post a msg back..
>
>
> Happy coding
>
> "RedRed" wrote:
>[color=green]
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Hi to connect to database if I want to write the code in
>> the class instead in the html (.aspx). What I want to do
>> is to create a reusable class which allow the other page
>> to connect using one class.
>>
>> Thanks all
>>[/color][/color]