If they've got script blockers enabled then they should already know to
disable them first if you've made it clear on the products download page,
that this is required.
Unfortunately, as far as varying IIS config's go, the best you can do IMHO,
is provide info on the products home/download page that explains what is
required, and how to configure it (a little help goes along way in my
experience).
As for your questions.......;
[color=blue]
> 1. Are there anyone here who make and distribute web based applications[/color]
that[color=blue]
> people can download from the Internet and install without first having
> contact with the vendor (you)?[/color]
Make them as generic as possible (i.e. pretty much stand-alone, with
instructions on config'ing the server)
[color=blue]
> 2. If yes to the above, how do you tackle installation problems?[/color]
Provide instructions for manual configuration
[color=blue]
> 3. Would the best way for the installation be to create a batch file[/color]
system[color=blue]
> that installs the application and then completely circumvent Install[/color]
shield?
Would that not be basically the same as using IS?
[color=blue]
> 4. Would a combination of scripting and active directory as seen here
>
http://www.eggheadcafe.com/articles/20010609.asp be a more safe way to go?[/color]
Probably, but that also assumes the user is running in admin mode (not a
problem if you've explained how to run it in "RunAs" mode).
--
Regards
Steven Burn
Ur I.T. Mate Group
www.it-mate.co.uk
Keeping it FREE!
"3f" <3f@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:C816ACF5-6718-4B4B-994D-8E08B8267C6E@microsoft.com...[color=blue]
> Hello;
>
> We have made a web application that people can download from our web site
> and installed on:
>
> Windows XP
> Windows 2000 Professional
> Windows 2003 Server
> Windows 2000 Server
>
> Provided that the target machine has IIS 5.0 or above installed.
>
> The installation files are created with Install Shield and we let Install
> Shield do a lot of the work i.e. create the virtual directory, installing
> MSDE, registering components, assigns security to the folder
> (IUSR_ComputerName) and things of that nature. We use windows scripting[/color]
host[color=blue]
> to check if ASP is installed in Windows 2003.
>
> Our goal is simple, we want people to be able to download and install our
> software with the same amount of problems one could expect form installing[/color]
a[color=blue]
> normal application which basically means that the installation is[/color]
successful[color=blue]
> 9 out of 10 times. At the moment we think that we have a rate which is[/color]
more[color=blue]
> like 1 or 2 out 10 installations are successful.
>
> When we install in our company on any of the above OS's we never have any
> problems, it runs each time.
>
> Know problems faced by our customers:
>
> - Script blocking enabled (as is usually the case if they have Mcafee or
> Norton antivirus installed). And since most people properly download and[/color]
try[color=blue]
> the web application on their XP Professional before installing on a[/color]
corporate[color=blue]
> server this is a major problem.
> - Special configurations on the IIS that somehow gives our installation
> problems
>
> As a general rule if a customer contacts us with installation problems we
> are always able to solve it, however most people do not contact us, hence[/color]
a[color=blue]
> potential sale is lost, and this even before they have seen our[/color]
application.[color=blue]
> Big problem.
>
> Questions:
>
> 1. Are there anyone here who make and distribute web based applications[/color]
that[color=blue]
> people can download from the Internet and install without first having
> contact with the vendor (you)?
> 2. If yes to the above, how do you tackle installation problems?
> 3. Would the best way for the installation be to create a batch file[/color]
system[color=blue]
> that installs the application and then completely circumvent Install[/color]
shield?[color=blue]
> 4. Would a combination of scripting and active directory as seen here
>
http://www.eggheadcafe.com/articles/20010609.asp be a more safe way to go?
>
> Hoping to hear something, maybe somebody here have an idea. We will be[/color]
quit[color=blue]
> willing to share our knowledge!
>[/color]
