You're correct, of course, guess I was thinking of more than just nameing
conventions. The old "Practical Standards for Visual Basic" from MS press
was more along the lines of what I was thinking of ... or perhaps, if you
want to do a LOT of reading "Code Complete" by McConnell.
"Larry Linson" <bouncer@localhost.not> wrote in message
news:dq6Ke.994$0d.282@trnddc09...[color=blue]
>
> "Scott McDaniel" <scott@infotrakkerDELETEME.com> wrote in message
> news:p_OdnbumaedAK2XfRVn-1w@comcast.com...[color=green]
>> The same standards apply to Access as would apply to VB6 ... it's
>> basically the same language[/color]
>
> Classic VB coding standards have never been as clean as Access -- there
> were at least three different naming conventions for classic VB used just
> within Microsoft.
>
> Except for refugees from VB who brought their old habits along, by far the
> most widely used and well known Naming Convention for Access is the
> Reddick Naming Convention,
www.xoc.net/standards/default.asp.
>
> Larry Linson
> Microsoft Access MVP
>[/color]