Why do imagettfbbox coordinates change when angle changes?

Hi,

I'm using php 4.4.4. Maybe I'm misreading the docs, but in the
imagettfbbox manual (http://us2.php.net/imagettfbbox), it says that
text coordinates are the same regardless of what the angle is. But I
am getting two distinct sets of coordinates if I change the angle from
zero to 270.

Here's the relevant code:

$text = "hello";
$s = getImageSize($img_file);
$imgWidth = $s[0];
$imgHeight = $s[1];
$source=ImageCreateFromJPEG($img_file);
$size=16;
$black=imagecolorallocate($source,0,0,0);
$font='/usr/share/fonts/msttcorefonts/times.ttf';
$bbox=imagettfbbox($size,$angle,$font,$text);
$textWidth=$bbox[2]-$bbox[0];
$textHeight=$bbox[5]-$bbox[3];
$x=($imgWidth/2)-($textWidth/2);
$y=($imgHeight/2)-($textHeight/2);
imagettftext($source,$size,$angle,$x,$y,$black,$fo nt,$text );
header("Content-type: image/jpeg");

When I print out the bbox with 0, I get

Array ( [0] =-3 [1] =-1 [2] =41 [3] =-1 [4] =41 [5] =-16
[6] =-3 [7] =-16 )

with 270, I get

Array ( [0] =-13 [1] =-1 [2] =-13 [3] =41 [4] =-1 [5] =41
[6] =-1 [7] =-1 )

I must be misinterpreting the docs. Why are the coordinates
different? - Dave

On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 18:18:13 +0100, laredotornado@zipmail.com
<laredotornado@zipmail.comwrote:Nope
"The points are relative to the text regardless of the angle , so "upper
left" means in the top left-hand corner seeing the text horizontally."

Which means that with normal text without an angle, you have this box with
the array-indexes:
6,7---------4,5
| |
0,1---------2,3

However, if you have an angle of 180 (text upside down), you see this
picture:
2,3---------0,1
| |
4,5---------6,7

So, 0 & 1 hold the 'lower left corner IF you see the text horizontally' as
opposed to the 'lower left corner if you look at the picture'. The
coordinates WILL change if the angele changes (how could they not?), but
the different indexes will be for the same relative position from the text
if you were to look at the image the way the text appears horizontal
again. (Damned, this is far more easily explained face-to-face by just
rotating a piece of paper...).
--
Rik Wasmus

Greetings, Rik Wasmus.
In reply to Your message dated Thursday, March 13, 2008, 21:31:59,
QFT :D

Thanks BTW, I was about to use this function myself and You just saved me time
to uncover this info by my own trials and errors.


--
Sincerely Yours, AnrDaemon <anrdaemon@freemail.ru>