"Dr John Stockton" <jrs@merlyn.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:I8E+TvG6TkADFwUy@merlyn.demon.co.uk...[color=blue]
> JRS: In article <indMe.40$uQ6.677@news.optus.net.au>, dated Tue, 16 Aug
> 2005 03:49:34, seen in news:comp.lang.javascript, RobG
> <rgqld@iinet.net.auau> posted :[color=green]
>>
>>There is little point in 'hiding' email addresses in web pages. Do a
>>search on "hide email address" and you will find many threads discussing
>>it. Here's one that's only a couple of weeks old:
>>
>><URL:
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/...l/browse_frm/t
>>hread/52b865188d082c35/22ae192f3ff1a9ef?q=hide+email+address&rnum=4&hl=en #22ae19
>>2f3ff1a9ef>
>>
>>It is generally accepted that a form is better than depending on the
>>user having an email client configured to respond to 'mailto:'.[/color]
>
> It is not universally accepted (even disregarding those who provide
> <TEXTAREA ROWS="3" WRAP="VIRTUAL" COLS="11"></TEXTAREA> to write in)
> that only forms should be used, though.
>
> Those who read Web pages off-line may find forms less convenient.
>
> Those who like to keep records of E-mail will like to keep the
> initiating message in the same form.
>
> ISTM that the best approach (where forms can be used; I don't want to
> provide such on my site) is to give the user a choice - provide a form
> and also an E-mail address (not necessarily with mailto: or written /en
> clair/) and, for businesses, an address for traditional mail too.[/color]
mailto links can be annoying (for example, when at an Internet cafe and it
suddenly opens up an unconfigured Outlook Express)... but it's very
convienient on my own computer. Also, if you use Firefox you can
right-click on a mailto link and the first item on the context menu is "copy
email address". Very handy.