Druckvorschau ist nur Schwarz weiß !!

Hallo,

ich gebe mit folgendem Code den text auf dem Dokument aus und kann ihn
so in der Druckvorschau ansehen befor ich ihn drucke.

pDC->SetTextColor(RGB ( 0,0,0) );
pDC->SetBkColor( RGB (0,95,160) );
pDC->TextOut(x*600,y*360,m_rSet->m_Vorname + " " + m_rSet->m_Name);


So wenn ich nun einen Farbdrucker ausgewählt habe dann hat der
Texhintergrund auch die richtige farbe. Wenn ich nun aber einen Schwar
weiß druckertreiber ausgewählt habe dann ist der Hintergrund weiß.

Kann ich den farbigen Hintergrund nicht erzwingen egal ob Schwarz weiß
drucker oder nicht ? ( natürlich nur in der Seitenansicht )

In MS Word geht das doch auch


Danke Jens

> Hallo,

Wakarimasen. Eigo wo hanashitte kudasai.

(English please)

[color=blue]
> ich gebe mit folgendem Code den text auf dem Dokument aus und kann
> ihn
> so in der Druckvorschau ansehen befor ich ihn drucke.[/color]

....

3 problems here.
- newsgroup is english
- off topic, see microsoft.public.ms-windows.programmer.win32 or .mfc
- MS Word has a self-written print preview. If you use the MFC thingy
it emulates the printer

cheers,
-Gernot

Gernot Frisch wrote:[color=blue][color=green]
> > ich gebe mit folgendem Code den text auf dem Dokument aus und kann
> > ihn
> > so in der Druckvorschau ansehen befor ich ihn drucke.[/color]
>
> ...
>
> 3 problems here.
> - newsgroup is english[/color]

Really? I know the majority of the members (if not all) speak English
and that it helps to have a common language. I do not believe, though,
that there is any mandate that posters must use English. I would hope
that a non-English speaker could still attempt to get help here, even
though such help may be limited. I would also hope that the use of
German alone is not enough to get someone flamed as OT.

just my halfpence,

REH

REH wrote:[color=blue]
> Gernot Frisch wrote:
>[color=green][color=darkred]
>>>ich gebe mit folgendem Code den text auf dem Dokument aus und kann
>>>ihn
>>>so in der Druckvorschau ansehen befor ich ihn drucke.[/color]
>>
>>...
>>
>>3 problems here.
>>- newsgroup is english[/color]
>
>
> Really? I know the majority of the members (if not all) speak English
> and that it helps to have a common language. I do not believe, though,
> that there is any mandate that posters must use English.[/color]

There is no mandate to post in any particular way, period. 'c.l.c++' is
after all an unmoderated newsgroup. However, there is Netiquette,
following which makes everything simpler. While Netiquette does not
require English to be used on posts to international newsgroups,
a charter of that newsgroup might.

No, I couldn't locate the original charter for 'comp.lang.c++' which leads
me to believe that it had outlived its usefulness at some point in the
past. However, there is the "Welcome" message posted here regularly that
_is_ in English (which should serve as a hint), it also mentions the FAQ
Lite (that does contain a section on 'comp.lang.c++', BTW), and that list
is also in English and contains some recommendations how to find _where_
to post (the use of local, humanlanguage-specific newsgroups should be
apparent here as well).

There is RFC 1855, which for NetNews recommends _reading_ the newsgroup
where you intend to post for one or two _months_ prior to posting. Had
_anyone_ who recently asked questions here for the first time done that?
I somehow strongly doubt that.

Had the OP of this thread cared to _read_ he might post differently and
cause less commotion.

The last thing I'd like to mention goes to respect and less to common
sense in Usenet postings. If one posts in a language that is not usually
spoken (written/read) in a newsgroup, he/she effectively *forcefully*
excludes those who don't understand that language from the discussion,
thus discriminating without a good reason. The same goes to posts with
OS-specific or compiler-specific subjects, and that's why they are met
with criticism. We are all interested in discussing C++. Very few of
us are interested in any particular OS or compiler, especially since there
are newsgroups for those specifically. Just like the 'de.comp.*' forums.
[color=blue]
> I would hope
> that a non-English speaker could still attempt to get help here, even
> though such help may be limited. I would also hope that the use of
> German alone is not enough to get someone flamed as OT.[/color]

Flamed, not. Corrected, absolutely.
[color=blue]
> just my halfpence,[/color]

Yep...

V
--
Please remove capital As from my address when replying by mail

REH wrote:[color=blue]
> Really? I know the majority of the members (if not all) speak English
> and that it helps to have a common language. I do not believe, though,
> that there is any mandate that posters must use English.[/color]

I'm pretty sure that the common charter of the Big Eight hierarchies
actually sets out English as the common language. I don't know how
to locate a corresponding document but I remember reading several
charter related documents when I became a moderator. ... and there
was definitely a discussion of the [human] language policies in those
hierarchies as well as UseNet wide policies (e.g. that asking others
to do a homework assignment is inappropriate, as are many other
things, of course).
[color=blue]
> I would also hope that the use of
> German alone is not enough to get someone flamed as OT.[/color]

Well, if we let it pass unchallenged, others might get the impression
that German is an appropriate language in this forum. Thus, we shall
not let it pass without pointing out that it is inappropriate. The
exact form of such a reply shall, of course, be appropriate. Of course,
we could happily flame the original article because it talks about
environment specific issues which are off-topic anyway :-)
--
<mailto:dietmar_kuehl@yahoo.com> <http://www.dietmar-kuehl.de/>
<http://www.eai-systems.com> - Efficient Artificial Intelligence

Victor Bazarov wrote:[color=blue]
> REH wrote:
> There is no mandate to post in any particular way, period. 'c.l.c++' is
> after all an unmoderated newsgroup. However, there is Netiquette,
> following which makes everything simpler. While Netiquette does not
> require English to be used on posts to international newsgroups,
> a charter of that newsgroup might.
>
> No, I couldn't locate the original charter for 'comp.lang.c++' which leads
> me to believe that it had outlived its usefulness at some point in the
> past. However, there is the "Welcome" message posted here regularly that
> _is_ in English (which should serve as a hint), it also mentions the FAQ
> Lite (that does contain a section on 'comp.lang.c++', BTW), and that list
> is also in English and contains some recommendations how to find _where_
> to post (the use of local, humanlanguage-specific newsgroups should be
> apparent here as well).
>
> There is RFC 1855, which for NetNews recommends _reading_ the newsgroup
> where you intend to post for one or two _months_ prior to posting. Had
> _anyone_ who recently asked questions here for the first time done that?
> I somehow strongly doubt that.
>
> Had the OP of this thread cared to _read_ he might post differently and
> cause less commotion.
>
> The last thing I'd like to mention goes to respect and less to common
> sense in Usenet postings. If one posts in a language that is not usually
> spoken (written/read) in a newsgroup, he/she effectively *forcefully*
> excludes those who don't understand that language from the discussion,
> thus discriminating without a good reason. The same goes to posts with
> OS-specific or compiler-specific subjects, and that's why they are met
> with criticism. We are all interested in discussing C++. Very few of
> us are interested in any particular OS or compiler, especially since there
> are newsgroups for those specifically. Just like the 'de.comp.*' forums.
>[color=green]
> > I would hope
> > that a non-English speaker could still attempt to get help here, even
> > though such help may be limited. I would also hope that the use of
> > German alone is not enough to get someone flamed as OT.[/color]
>
> Flamed, not. Corrected, absolutely.
>[color=green]
> > just my halfpence,[/color]
>
> Yep...
>
> V
> --[/color]


Well, I will submit to the will of the majority. I do find it a little
sad, though.

REH

REH wrote:[color=blue]
> Victor Bazarov wrote:
> [...blah blah blah-dee-blah...]
>
> Well, I will submit to the will of the majority. I do find it a little
> sad, though.[/color]

Democracy's a bitch. The alternatives are worse, however.

In article <47qis2Fh4tl8U1@individual.net>, Gernot Frisch
<Me@Privacy.net> writes[color=blue]
>[color=green]
>> ich gebe mit folgendem Code den text auf dem Dokument aus und kann
>> ihn
>> so in der Druckvorschau ansehen befor ich ihn drucke.[/color]
>
>...
>
>3 problems here.
>- newsgroup is english[/color]

No its not. You can use any language here. Might get better relies if
you use the right non-English language. :-)
[color=blue]
>- off topic, see microsoft.public.ms-windows.programmer.win32 or .mfc
>- MS Word has a self-written print preview. If you use the MFC thingy
>it emulates the printer[/color]

Agreed. though as you posted in English you have no idea if the OP
understands that....
--
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
\/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/
/\/\/ chris@phaedsys.org www.phaedsys.org \/\/\
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/

In article <47qsa9Fgp0t6U1@individual.net>, Dietmar Kuehl
<dietmar_kuehl@yahoo.com> writes[color=blue]
>[color=green]
>> I would also hope that the use of
>> German alone is not enough to get someone flamed as OT.[/color]
>
>Well, if we let it pass unchallenged, others might get the impression
>that German is an appropriate language in this forum.[/color]

and why not if they want to use it. It will restrict the replies they
let. Let democracy prevail.

--
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
\/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/
/\/\/ chris@phaedsys.org www.phaedsys.org \/\/\
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/

In article <DyWRf.6222$a97.3444@newsread1.mlpsca01.us.to.veri o.net>,
Victor Bazarov <v.Abazarov@comAcast.net> writes[color=blue]
>REH wrote:[color=green]
>> Gernot Frisch wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>>>>ich gebe mit folgendem Code den text auf dem Dokument aus und kann
>>>>ihn
>>>>so in der Druckvorschau ansehen befor ich ihn drucke.
>>>
>>>...
>>>
>>>3 problems here.
>>>- newsgroup is english[/color]
>>
>>
>> Really? I know the majority of the members (if not all) speak English
>> and that it helps to have a common language. I do not believe, though,
>> that there is any mandate that posters must use English.[/color]
>
>No, I couldn't locate the original charter for 'comp.lang.c++' which leads
>me to believe that it had outlived its usefulness at some point in the
>past. However, there is the "Welcome" message posted here regularly that
>_is_ in English[/color]

I bet it's in American :-)
[color=blue]
>The last thing I'd like to mention goes to respect and less to common
>sense in Usenet postings. If one posts in a language that is not usually
>spoken (written/read) in a newsgroup, he/she effectively *forcefully*
>excludes those who don't understand that language from the discussion,
>thus discriminating without a good reason.[/color]

You don't know that.

Also by insisting on English you are also excluding a large part of the
world that don't use English.

I don't know what is going to happen when the Chinese eventually get
open access to the Internet NG's what does Chines look like in ASCII?
:-)

BTW I note The IEEE recently excluded large parts of it's membership
recently whilst the US engaged in a war for Democracy :-)

People can use any language they like. It just restricts the number of
people who can reply to them. Either more people will start using
German (or what ever) or they won't. Natural selection.
[color=blue]
>The same goes to posts with
>OS-specific or compiler-specific subjects, and that's why they are met
>with criticism.[/color]

Agreed.
--
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
\/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/
/\/\/ chris@phaedsys.org www.phaedsys.org \/\/\
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/

Chris Hills wrote:
[color=blue]
> I don't know what is going to happen when the Chinese eventually get
> open access to the Internet NG's what does Chines look like in ASCII?
> :-)[/color]


Just look at the porn and warez spam in this newsgroup. :-)

Chris Hills wrote:[color=blue]
> In article <DyWRf.6222$a97.3444@newsread1.mlpsca01.us.to.veri o.net>,
> Victor Bazarov <v.Abazarov@comAcast.net> writes
> [...][color=green]
>>The last thing I'd like to mention goes to respect and less to common
>>sense in Usenet postings. If one posts in a language that is not usually
>>spoken (written/read) in a newsgroup, he/she effectively *forcefully*
>>excludes those who don't understand that language from the discussion,
>>thus discriminating without a good reason.[/color]
>
>
> You don't know that.[/color]

Oh, yes, I do. That's why I said it.
[color=blue]
> Also by insisting on English you are also excluding a large part of the
> world that don't use English.[/color]

Yes, but for their benefit there are local newsgroups, like 'de.comp' or
'cz.comp' or 'japan.comp' hierarchies.
[color=blue]
> [...]
>
> People can use any language they like. It just restricts the number of
> people who can reply to them. Either more people will start using
> German (or what ever) or they won't. Natural selection.[/color]

So, my reply to him/her is part of that natural selection. You have
a problem with that?

V
--
Please remove capital As from my address when replying by mail

Chris Hills wrote:[color=blue]
> In article <47qsa9Fgp0t6U1@individual.net>, Dietmar Kuehl
> <dietmar_kuehl@yahoo.com> writes
>[color=green][color=darkred]
>>>I would also hope that the use of
>>>German alone is not enough to get someone flamed as OT.[/color]
>>
>>Well, if we let it pass unchallenged, others might get the impression
>>that German is an appropriate language in this forum.[/color]
>
>
> and why not if they want to use it. It will restrict the replies they
> let. Let democracy prevail.[/color]

I think you confuse anarchy with democracy.

[color=blue]
> Democracy's a bitch. The alternatives are worse, however.[/color]

If you want 90% stupids to choose for your future, democracy's the way
to go. BTW. There's no democracy in Germany, otherwise we would not
have the Euro, nor would we be part of the EU. We have not been asked
and we had no alternatives to choose from.
*Sigh*

REH wrote in message[color=blue]
> I would also hope that the use of
>German alone is not enough to get someone flamed as OT.
>REH[/color]

OOOhh, German!! I thought it was some freaked out Ozark moonshiner, who
sampled too much of his squeezins, and was typing to Dvorak on a Qwerty
keyboard!
No wonder ROT13 didn't work on it.

--
Bob <G> R
POVrookie

Gernot Frisch <Me@Privacy.net> schrieb
[color=blue]
>[color=green]
>> Democracy's a bitch. The alternatives are worse, however.[/color]
>
> If you want 90% stupids to choose for your future, democracy's the way
> to go. BTW. There's no democracy in Germany, otherwise we would not
> have the Euro, nor would we be part of the EU. We have not been asked
> and we had no alternatives to choose from.[/color]

Well, at least you can choose your official leader.
Its not so, that this would have any influence, but it's still much more
than you can do in other countries.