Is there anything wrong with using % instead of ems? % seems to have a
better effect when resizing.
--
Erik Andersson ( AussieTraders.com.au )
http://www.aussietraders.com.au/
- Placing an add is FREE at AussieTraders.com.au, Australia's buy & sell
marketplace
"Neal" <neal413@spamrcn.com> wrote in message
news:opr3jqx6msdvhyks@news.rcn.com...[color=blue]
> On Wed, 18 Feb 2004 12:57:23 +1000, AussieTraders.com.au
> <bounce@aussietraders.com.au> wrote:
>[color=green]
> > Should I use <font size=-2> or <font size=1>?? They seem to give the[/color][/color]
same[color=blue][color=green]
> > results...[/color]
>
> Relative, because the effect is identical only when you're default is 3.
> If you need a larger size, 1 is going to be impossible. Be aware that
> setting font sizes in the HTML is deprecated in the most recent
> recommendations.
>[color=green]
> > I wish to be able to set the default font family and font size for a
> > website
> > and STILL SUPPORT _fluid_texts_.[/color]
>
> An external CSS will do you wonders. Check out
http://www.htmldog.com for
> a good beginning to CSS.
>
> Still, you are subject to the realities of the web - the user may not have
> the font you wish to designate, so have fallbacks and make the page look
> good on the fallbacks. And allow the user to resixe text to make it
> readable, use ems for font-size rather than a fixed measurement. You may
> *suggest* a font family and size, but it may not be what is possible or
> even desirable on some people's computers.[/color]