In article <bg1741$c5$1@wisteria.csv.warwick.ac.uk> in
comp.infosystems.
www.authoring.html, David Walker
<wbsdavenews@hotmail.com> wrote:[color=blue]
>I think it is clear from that that I said that it ignores the line breaks
>(as a line break) in html, "but they appear as a space"!!!![/color]
Apparently the point of my quote from Lewis Carroll was not clear:
Your original statement that line breaks are "ignored" was wrong.
When that was pointed out (not by me), you tried to redefine
"ignore" and create a distinction between your newly-redefined word
and "ignore completely".
[color=blue]
>Its like being back at school having my essays checked! Sheesh! :o/[/color]
The difference is that here on Usenet everyone _chooses_ to put his
or her work up for criticism. No one need do it who does not wish
to. When you or I or anyone makes a false statement instead of
being silent, we can hardly then turn around and complain that we
are being "checked".
A grownup would say (or at least think) "Thank you for the
correction. Now I know something I didn't know before." I think most
of the regulars have had occasion to do that on occasion: certainly
I have.
Anyway, if your work was being checked I'd have something to say
about your use of the third person neuter present indicative of the
verb "to be".
--
Stan Brown, Oak Road Systems, Cortland County, New York, USA
http://OakRoadSystems.com/
HTML 4.01 spec:
http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/
validator:
http://validator.w3.org/
CSS 2 spec:
http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/
validator:
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/