on Wed Jun 13 10:17:24 CEST 2007, Diez B. Roggisch deets at nospam.web.de wrote:
Quote:
>markacy wrote:
> Quote:
>On 13 Cze, 09:45, "fdu.xia... at gmail.com" <fdu.xia... at
>gmail.comwrote: Quote:
>>Hi all,
>>>
>>I can use list comprehension to create list quickly. So I
>>expected that I
>>can created tuple quickly with the same syntax. But I
>>found that the
>>same syntax will get a generator, not a tuple. Here is my
>>example:
>>>
>>In [147]: a = (i for i in range(10))
>>>
>>In [148]: b = [i for i in range(10)]
>>>
>>In [149]: type(a)
>>Out[149]: <type 'generator'>
>>>
>>In [150]: type(b)
>>Out[150]: <type 'list'>
| | |
[...]
Quote:
Quote:
>You should do it like this:
>> Quote:
>>>>a = tuple([i for i in range(10)])
>>>>type(a)
| ><type 'tuple'>
| |
[...]
Quote:
>No need to create the intermediate list, a generator
>expression works just
>fine:
>
>a = tuple(i for i in range(10))
|
Well I have looked into this and it seems that using the list
comprehension is faster, which is reasonable since generators require
iteration and stop iteration and what not.
# If you really really want a tuple, use [24] style
# if you need a generator use [27] style (without the tuple keyword
# off course)
In [24]: %timeit tuple([x for x in range(1000)])
10000 loops, best of 3: 185 µs per loop
In [25]: %timeit tuple([x for x in range(1000)])
1000 loops, best of 3: 195 µs per loop
In [26]: %timeit tuple([x for x in range(1000)])
10000 loops, best of 3: 194 µs per loop
#################################################
In [27]: %timeit tuple((x for x in range(1000)))
1000 loops, best of 3: 271 µs per loop
In [28]: %timeit tuple((x for x in range(1000)))
1000 loops, best of 3: 253 µs per loop
In [29]: %timeit tuple((x for x in range(1000)))
1000 loops, best of 3: 276 µs per loop
Thanks
--
Hatem Nassrat
Re: How to create a tuple quickly with list comprehension? 
