Help | Site Map
Connecting Tech Pros Worldwide
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
Old August 11th, 2008, 06:17 AM
Newbie
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 3
Default Want Auto-Updating, conflicted on best approach.

So I have this windows .net form app, and I have the following goals:

-Needs to be 1 single file, the executable, in any directory the user decides to download it to. No installation folder, no launcher/updater app, no registry entries.

-App to automatically check for updates, ask permission from user, update app, and relaunch.(if necessary)



I've never done this before, so I don't know the correct way to go about this, and my current idea is this:

1) Launch app, check a webservice for updates. If app is up to date, or if app does not receive a response fast enough, or if there is an exception, or if user selects not to update, continue launching app like normal.

2) If app is out of date and user selects to update, download 2 applications from webservice. Lets call them newForm.exe and updater.exe. Since I don't know what filenames will exist in the app's directory, they'll be named something random until they're confirmed to not overwrite anything.

3) "updater.exe" will be executed and passed the current app's filename as well as the new "newForm.exe" app's filename.

4) updater.exe closes all threads and processes of the current app, then deletes the current app executable.

5) updater.exe renames newForm.exe to whatever the original app's filename was, and then executes newForm.exe, passing along updater.exe's filename.

6) newForm.exe is now the current app, only now its updated. If it is launched with updater.exe's filename as an argument, deletes updater.exe. And then it should just be the updated standalone form, I think.



Like I said, I've never attemped auto-updating before, but with this current app, user convenience is the highest priority. These users have a history of never updating anything because they can't be arsed to read their email, and they hate installing things. Im seriously considering not even asking them if they want to update and just force it down their throat.

Questions:
Is this approach silly/ridiculous and done better in a much simpler way?

Will this approach work, or will windows/firewalls/anti-virus programs get in the way and mess it all up?


Any help, tips, and advice are much appreciated!
Reply
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

What is Bytes?

We are a network of experts and professionals in IT and software development that help one another with answers to tough questions and share insights. Get the best answers to your questions from over network members.
Post your question now . . .
It's fast and it's free

Popular Articles