Help | Site Map
Connecting Tech Pros Worldwide
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
Old August 3rd, 2008, 07:15 PM
Ulf Dingler
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Only 90MB for SQL Server 2005 on a Windows 2003 64bit 12GB System

Hi.
I have a Dell Server with Windows 2003 R2 SP2 64bit ,SQL Server 2005 SP2
(also 64Bit) and 12GB Ram. The Problem is, that the SQL Server Process only
allocates max 90-100MB. That's why big SQLs run very slow.

I checked the setup variables on the managment console and everything seems
to be ok. I don't know how to solve this problem.

Please help!

Ulf

  #2  
Old August 3rd, 2008, 10:05 PM
Jamal
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Only 90MB for SQL Server 2005 on a Windows 2003 64bit 12GB System

Hopefully the following helps, check their recommedations:

http://www.microsoft.com/technet/pro...hysdbstor.mspx

http://www.microsoft.com/technet/pro...n/sqlops6.mspx


"Ulf Dingler" <u.dingler@lasartes.dewrote in message
news:6fmabrFbskioU1@mid.uni-berlin.de...
Quote:
Hi.
I have a Dell Server with Windows 2003 R2 SP2 64bit ,SQL Server 2005 SP2
(also 64Bit) and 12GB Ram. The Problem is, that the SQL Server Process
only allocates max 90-100MB. That's why big SQLs run very slow.
>
I checked the setup variables on the managment console and everything
seems to be ok. I don't know how to solve this problem.
>
Please help!
>
Ulf

  #3  
Old August 3rd, 2008, 11:05 PM
Erland Sommarskog
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Only 90MB for SQL Server 2005 on a Windows 2003 64bit 12GB System

Ulf Dingler (u.dingler@lasartes.de) writes:
Quote:
I have a Dell Server with Windows 2003 R2 SP2 64bit ,SQL Server 2005 SP2
(also 64Bit) and 12GB Ram. The Problem is, that the SQL Server Process
only allocates max 90-100MB. That's why big SQLs run very slow.
>
I checked the setup variables on the managment console and everything
seems to be ok. I don't know how to solve this problem.
What does "sp_configure 'max server memory'" report? And "sp_configure
'awe enabled'"?

Have you check in Task Manager whether there is any other process that
takes up a lot of memory?

How big are your databases?

--
Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, esquel@sommarskog.se

Books Online for SQL Server 2005 at
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/pro...ads/books.mspx
Books Online for SQL Server 2000 at
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/prodinf...ons/books.mspx
  #4  
Old August 4th, 2008, 05:45 AM
Ulf Dingler
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Only 90MB for SQL Server 2005 on a Windows 2003 64bit 12GB System

"Erland Sommarskog" <esquel@sommarskog.seschrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:Xns9AF0D6C2AFBYazorman@127.0.0.1...

Quote:
What does "sp_configure 'max server memory'" report? And "sp_configure
'awe enabled'"?
>
Have you check in Task Manager whether there is any other process that
takes up a lot of memory?
>
awe is enabled but i read, that awe is not important for 64bit. sp_configure
'max server memory' reports 2147483647. no other process takes more than
60mb and there is a lot of memory free (10GB) for the sql server process.
Quote:
How big are your databases?
>
the databases are very big. 7GB/9GB/70GB

  #5  
Old August 4th, 2008, 10:25 PM
Erland Sommarskog
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Only 90MB for SQL Server 2005 on a Windows 2003 64bit 12GB System

Ulf Dingler (u.dingler@lasartes.de) writes:
Quote:
awe is enabled but i read, that awe is not important for 64bit.
That's correct. It's not supposed to have any effect at all, but it
does affect something, although I don't recall exactly what.

On 32-bit when you have AWE enabled, and look in task manager, you don't
see the true size of SQL Server, as the AWE memory is not included. Maybe
there is a similar effect on 64-bit? Could you run DBCC MEMORYSTATUS and
post the output?
Quote:
the databases are very big. 7GB/9GB/70GB
Ehum, 70GB could be called mediums-sized, but it does not really
qualify as "very big". Not that it matter here. Unless the data-access
pattern is very concentrated, it seems unlikely that SQL Server would
not need more memory than 100 MB.


--
Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, esquel@sommarskog.se

Books Online for SQL Server 2005 at
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/pro...ads/books.mspx
Books Online for SQL Server 2000 at
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/prodinf...ons/books.mspx
  #6  
Old August 5th, 2008, 06:25 AM
Ed Murphy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Only 90MB for SQL Server 2005 on a Windows 2003 64bit 12GB System

Ulf Dingler wrote:
Quote:
I have a Dell Server with Windows 2003 R2 SP2 64bit ,SQL Server 2005 SP2
(also 64Bit) and 12GB Ram. The Problem is, that the SQL Server Process only
allocates max 90-100MB. That's why big SQLs run very slow.
>
I checked the setup variables on the managment console and everything seems
to be ok. I don't know how to solve this problem.
You can force SQL's memory usage by setting minimum and maximum to the
same value (say 10 GB, leaving the other 2 GB for the other processes).
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

What is Bytes?

We are a network of experts and professionals in IT and software development that help one another with answers to tough questions and share insights. Get the best answers to your questions from over network members.
Post your question now . . .
It's fast and it's free

Popular Articles