Re: Browser survey
Question posted by: Guy Macon
(Guest)
on
July 3rd, 2008 10:15 PM
Matt Probert wrote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by
>Web page authors have lots of rights. They can also insist on only
>writing the text of their page in Mala, but I should tentatively
>suggest that English might have a wider potential audience?
|
Indeed. The web page author can get away with deciding to use
a few non-standard fleemishes and the reader will still be able
to gloork the meaning from the context, but there ix a limit;
If too many ot the vleeps are changed, it becomes harder and
qixer to fllf what the wethcz is blorping, and evenually izs
is bkb longer possible to ghilred frok at wifx. Dnighth?
Ngfipht yk ur! Uvq the hhvd or hnnngh. Blorgk? Blorgk!
Blorgkity-blorgk!!!!
--
Guy Macon
<http://www.GuyMacon.com/>
Would you like to answer this question?
Sign up for a free account, or Login (if you're already a member).
|
|
July 4th, 2008 05:05 PM
# 2
|
Re: Re: Browser survey
Guy Macon schreef:
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Matt Probert wrote:
>
Quote:
Originally Posted by
>Web page authors have lots of rights. They can also insist on only
>writing the text of their page in Mala, but I should tentatively
>suggest that English might have a wider potential audience?
|
>
Indeed. The web page author can get away with deciding to use
a few non-standard fleemishes and the reader will still be able
to gloork the meaning from the context, but there ix a limit;
If too many ot the vleeps are changed, it becomes harder and
qixer to fllf what the wethcz is blorping, and evenually izs
is bkb longer possible to ghilred frok at wifx. Dnighth?
Ngfipht yk ur! Uvq the hhvd or hnnngh. Blorgk? Blorgk!
Blorgkity-blorgk!!!!
>
>
|
LOL!
I totally second that after reading through this huge thread.
Thanks for a good laugh, Matt! ;-)
Have a nice weekend!
Regards,
Erwin Moller
|
|
|
July 4th, 2008 05:05 PM
# 3
|
Re: Re: Browser survey
Erwin Moller schreef:
Quote:
Originally Posted by
>
Guy Macon schreef:
Quote:
Originally Posted by
>Matt Probert wrote:
>>
Quote:
Originally Posted by
>>Web page authors have lots of rights. They can also insist on only
>>writing the text of their page in Mala, but I should tentatively
>>suggest that English might have a wider potential audience?
|
>>
>Indeed. The web page author can get away with deciding to use a few
>non-standard fleemishes and the reader will still be able
>to gloork the meaning from the context, but there ix a limit;
>If too many ot the vleeps are changed, it becomes harder and qixer to
>fllf what the wethcz is blorping, and evenually izs is bkb longer
>possible to ghilred frok at wifx. Dnighth? Ngfipht yk ur! Uvq the
>hhvd or hnnngh. Blorgk? Blorgk! Blorgkity-blorgk!!!!
>>
>>
|
>
>
LOL!
>
I totally second that after reading through this huge thread.
Thanks for a good laugh, Matt! ;-)
|
Oops, I mean Guy of course!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
>
Have a nice weekend!
>
Regards,
Erwin Moller
|
|
|
|
July 4th, 2008 07:25 PM
# 4
|
Re: Re: Browser survey
Erwin Moller wrote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by
>
>Guy Macon <http://www.GuyMacon.com/schreef:
>
Quote:
Originally Posted by
>Matt Probert wrote:
>>
Quote:
Originally Posted by
>>Web page authors have lots of rights. They can also insist on only
>>writing the text of their page in Mala, but I should tentatively
>>suggest that English might have a wider potential audience?
|
>>
>Indeed. The web page author can get away with deciding to use
>a few non-standard fleemishes and the reader will still be able
>to gloork the meaning from the context, but there ix a limit;
>If too many ot the vleeps are changed, it becomes harder and
>qixer to fllf what the wethcz is blorping, and evenually izs
>is bkb longer possible to ghilred frok at wifx. Dnighth?
>Ngfipht yk ur! Uvq the hhvd or hnnngh. Blorgk? Blorgk!
>Blorgkity-blorgk!!!!
|
>
>LOL!
>
>I totally second that after reading through this huge thread.
>Thanks for a good laugh, Matt! ;-)
|
You just complemented Matt Probert for something that was
written by Guy Macon.
--
Guy Macon
<http://www.GuyMacon.com/>
|
|
|
July 4th, 2008 07:25 PM
# 5
|
Re: Re: Browser survey
Erwin Moller wrote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by
>Oops, I mean Guy of course!
|
Note to self: Next time, read entire thread before replying. :)
--
Guy Macon
<http://www.GuyMacon.com/>
|
|
|
July 4th, 2008 08:45 PM
# 6
|
Re: Re: Browser survey
On Jul 4, 3:22*pm, Guy Macon <http://www.GuyMacon.com/wrote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by
You just complemented Matt Probert for something that was
written by Guy Macon.
|
<singer artist="Carly-Simon">
Your so vain... you probably think this thread is about you....
</singer>
|
|
|
July 5th, 2008 12:55 AM
# 7
|
Re: Re: Browser survey
On Fri, 04 Jul 2008 13:37:44 -0700, Travis Newbury wrote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Your so vain... you probably think this thread is about you....
|
You're.
|
|
|
July 5th, 2008 08:05 AM
# 8
|
Re: Re: Browser survey
Erwin Moller
<Since_humans_read_this_I_am_spammed_too_much@spamy ourself.comwrote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by
>
>Erwin Moller schreef:
Quote:
Originally Posted by
>>
>Guy Macon schreef:
Quote:
Originally Posted by
>>Matt Probert wrote:
>>>
>>>Web page authors have lots of rights. They can also insist on only
>>>writing the text of their page in Mala, but I should tentatively
>>>suggest that English might have a wider potential audience?
>>>
>>Indeed. The web page author can get away with deciding to use a few
>>non-standard fleemishes and the reader will still be able
>>to gloork the meaning from the context, but there ix a limit;
>>If too many ot the vleeps are changed, it becomes harder and qixer to
>>fllf what the wethcz is blorping, and evenually izs is bkb longer
>>possible to ghilred frok at wifx. Dnighth? Ngfipht yk ur! Uvq the
>>hhvd or hnnngh. Blorgk? Blorgk! Blorgkity-blorgk!!!!
>>>
>>>
|
>>
>>
>LOL!
>>
>I totally second that after reading through this huge thread.
>Thanks for a good laugh, Matt! ;-)
|
>
>Oops, I mean Guy of course!
>
|
Its a team game, and team effort.
Matt
--
The Probert Encyclopaedia
http://www.probertencyclopaedia.com
|
|
|
July 5th, 2008 03:55 PM
# 9
|
Re: Re: Browser survey
"Guy Macon" <http://www.GuyMacon.com/wrote ...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
You just complemented Matt Probert for something that was
written by Guy Macon.
|
And that's a serious error.
|
|
|
July 7th, 2008 04:35 PM
# 10
|
Re: Re: Browser survey
Guy Macon schreef:
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Erwin Moller wrote:
>
Quote:
Originally Posted by
>Oops, I mean Guy of course!
|
>
Note to self: Next time, read entire thread before replying. :)
>
|
Hi Guy (<-- I did it right this time!),
Keeping up with this thread takes a lot of time (I quited my daytime job
to keep up with it), so I completely understand your error. ;-)
Regards,
Erwin Moller
Not the answer you were looking for? Post your question . . .
182,317 Experts ready to help you find a solution.
Sign up for a free account, or Login (if you're already a member).
|
|
|
Top Community Contributors
|
