In article <jiij54dac3jgodiadghr9mjgv7ea1m37oe@4ax.com>,
Ed Jay <edMbj@aes-intl.comwrote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by
dorayme scribed:
>
Quote:
Originally Posted by
In article
<13ba6d07-04fe-448d-8734-611c82d5d4a7@34g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>,
DiamondEagle <andyza@webmail.co.zawrote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Is there a way to center the following div without using the <center>
tags?
>
|
The first two pages of
<http://netweaver.com.au/centring/>
should give you a good idea of how to do both these things.
|
>
That seems like a very helpful site. Is there a navigation page? The home
page seems to have only a mail form.
|
The things on this server are mainly just sets of self-contained pages.
This set seems short enough not to need a menu but if I grow it, I guess
I will put some navigation beyond the pages menu at top and bottom.
I am a bit worried at the slightly artificial connection of things under
the topic of centring in this set. What else should I put?
* My views on the aesthetics of centring?
* My take on why centring has such an appeal (I reckon it has to do
with the importance of left/right symmetry in animal evolution)?
* Perhaps an attempt at humorous, maybe even florid writing, about why
archery targets have the bull's eye in the centre; after all, even a
bull does not have its eye in the dead centre of its bulk, neither
mass-fully nor geometrically speaking? And besides, it has two eyes.
* Why don't dart boards have two bulls eyes like bulls, you could get
100 only if you can throw two darts at once each landing on different
eyes? Perhaps I could make and market a special and more rational
dart-board, closer to bull. (psst, Boji, wanna send me some $buckeroos
as an advance payment for one of these?)
--
dorayme
