Have a very long select element repeated

Scripsit Join Bytes!:


Tell the people who told you to do that what the drawbacks are. You should
be able to list down half a dozen good reasons easily.


Technically, it need not be repeated, since you can use the MULTIPLE
attribute in the select element. However, people will generally not know
that they can select multiple elements and how to do that, and even if they
do, its is a nightmare to actually make such selections.

Using a set of checkboxes (associated with country names) would produce
_much_ better usability. Users would have to scroll the _page_ then, but is
this any worse than having to scroll the drop down _menu_? No, it's actually
much better, more useable.

Perhaps even better, you could include a text input field (input type="text"
or textarea) where people can type in the names of the countries. You would
then need to parse - in the server-side form handler - the names, maybe even
with synonym recognition and loose matching (taking, say, "finland",
"finnland", and "finlandia" all matching "Finland"). More work to you, maybe
better usability to users.

--
Jukka K. Korpela ("Yucca")
http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/

Jukka K. Korpela wrote:

[...]


My sentiments exactly: Dropdown menus are almost always bad. To select one
or more items out of FEW choices, use radiobuttons or checkboxes.

For a larger number of choices, use text entry boxes and parse the result
server-side.

I always love it when I'm looking for a local representative of a company
that has a handful of offices around the world, and the web droid who did
the page crammed every country in existence into a drop-down list.

Or credit card expiration dates from the past.

Or birth year selectors that go from 1900 to 2007.

Or all the other shit with which marketing folks cripple potentially useful
web pages.

robert

Scripsit Robert Latest:


.... as well as some non-existent countries, such as "Serbia and Montenegro",
and missing some of the existing countries, like "Serbia" and "Montenegro".

Allowing _all_ countries (for some definition for "country") might be
adequate e.g. in a form where you ask for a user's postal address or
nationality. Then the list of countries needs to be maintained somehow,
since changes _will_ take place. It need not be more difficult to maintain
it in the HTML source than to maintain it in the form handler, though. The
point is that one shouldn't aim at a list of all countries unless it's
really _needed_.

--
Jukka K. Korpela ("Yucca")
http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/

Robert Latest wrote:


That's one of the rare occasion where AJAX can slightly improve user's
experience by providing auto-completion when typing the country name in a
text entry box, as Google Suggest does.

Of course, it's just an *improvement*. The code must be written without
JavaScript, and then, add the JavaScript code that intercepts key strokes.

--
You can contact me at <tabkanDELETETHISnaz@yahoDELETETHATo.fr>

Jukka K. Korpela wrote:


Generally I would agree, but in this case there are over 300 items in
the list. Checkboxes aren't a good alternative when there are that many
items.


Yes. If the user knows which countries he wants to visit, allowing him
to type them, rather than sort through an exhaustive list to find them
would be better.

Scripsit Scott Bryce:


I don't think there are that many countries in world, even under a fairly
broad meaning for "country". A list of _areas_ could be arbitrarily long, of
course.

Anyway, if it's too much for a set of checkboxes, it's even stronger too
much for a select list. Imagine yourself scrolling up and down in a list of
remember what you have already selected and what you wish to select, and
trying to figure out whether you should try to find the United Kingdom under
"B" (Britain), "E" (England) or "G" (Great Britain) or maybe "U".


And then you could accept all the commonly used synonyms for a country.
There will be input errors, inevitably, that would be avoided in select or
checkbox approaches, though.

--
Jukka K. Korpela ("Yucca")
http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/

Jukka K. Korpela wrote:

In the United States we have a similar situation, where dropdowns
listing the states and state-equivalents (the District of Columbia,
Puerto Rico, US Virgin Islands, etc.) including nations that were once
under US administration as part of the UN Trust Territory of the Pacific
but that became independent nations years ago. Though I admit I haven't
seen one that includes the Panama Canal Zone.