"Bã§TãRÐ" <nobody@msn.com> wrote in message
news:165eg0h0j64hi4a5vut3vhr66qg6j230q8@4ax.com...[color=blue]
> ASP.net is compiled code so theoretically its supposed to be fatser
> than classic asp. One thing that I have noticed and heard from
> numerous sources is all the hard stuff you've had to do in ASP (i.e dB
> connections , form controls etc) have been made much much much easier
> to use. It is these performance enhancements to the common every day
> crap I have to deal with that has prompted me to start learning about
> asp.net
>
> Bastard
>
>
> On Thu, 22 Jul 2004 09:16:56 -0400, "Bob Barrows [MVP]"
> <reb01501@NOyahoo.SPAMcom> wrote:
>[color=green]
> >michaaal wrote:[color=darkred]
> >> I have been using ASP for a few years now. For the most part I have
> >> been able to make it do what I need for it to do. Is there a reason
> >> I might want to be learning ASPX? Can someone point out some of the
> >> general differences between ASP and ASPX?
> >>
> >> Thank you in advance,
> >> Michaaael[/color][/color]
>
>
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=AS...e=UTF-8&c2coff[/color]
=1&sa=N&tab=wg[color=blue][color=green]
> >
> >Bob Barrows[/color]
>[/color]
Thanks Guys.