Help | Site Map
Connecting Tech Pros Worldwide
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
Old July 19th, 2005, 11:38 AM
Luis
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Different ways to prevent cachine

The http://www.aspfaq.com/2022 and
http://www.learnasp.com/learn/cachenomore.asp pages describe two
slightly different ways to prevent a page caching on the users
machine.

The two differences that I'm interested in are:

- the Response.CacheControl = "no-cache" in the learnasp.com version
and
- the 'must-revalidate' in the aspfaq.com version.

What are these commands and should I use them or not?

Thanks
  #2  
Old July 19th, 2005, 11:38 AM
name
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Different ways to prevent cachine

You can not.

======

Per design (whatever ms says)

you can not prevent a recepient/user

looking at the actual recieved "code"

on way or the other.

================

The same way that you can not be tricked
by a contactor to sign something in your home
by only been showed the last page.

============


Get real buddy.

------------

Einstein had it in theory in the 20's, and it took those
nuclear monkeys till today to prove it


Don't prove it that you are wrong.




"Luis" <andyza@webmail.co.za> wrote in message
news:69476b6f.0402030018.2b760033@posting.google.c om...[color=blue]
> The http://www.aspfaq.com/2022 and
> http://www.learnasp.com/learn/cachenomore.asp pages describe two
> slightly different ways to prevent a page caching on the users
> machine.
>
> The two differences that I'm interested in are:
>
> - the Response.CacheControl = "no-cache" in the learnasp.com version
> and
> - the 'must-revalidate' in the aspfaq.com version.
>
> What are these commands and should I use them or not?
>
> Thanks[/color]

  #3  
Old July 19th, 2005, 11:39 AM
Luis
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Different ways to prevent cachine

On Tue, 3 Feb 2004 03:39:46 -0500, "name" <nospam@user.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
>You can not.
>
>Per design (whatever ms says)
>you can not prevent a recepient/user
>looking at the actual recieved "code"
>on way or the other.
>[/color]

<SNIP>

Somebody obviously didn't read the post properly!

My post had *** NOTHING *** to do with hiding my source code! Read it
again and you'll see that I was asking a question about the 2 slightly
different methods of preventing a page from being CACHED on the users
browser that are discussed in the two articles that I posted (i.e.
forcing the page from being retrieved from the server on each
request).

That's very different to hiding my source code...

 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

What is Bytes?

We are a network of experts and professionals in IT and software development that help one another with answers to tough questions and share insights. Get the best answers to your questions from over network members.
Post your question now . . .
It's fast and it's free

Popular Articles