Help | Site Map
Connecting Tech Pros Worldwide
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
Old March 10th, 2006, 01:45 PM
Erik van Zijst
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default substitutiongroups and inheritance

I'm having trouble translating my object inheritance models to xmlschema
and have illustrated this in the attached example xsd and xml.

In my example I have a canvas for drawing a new painting and the xsd
contains the instructions for drawing this painting. According to
instructor Bob, a painting constists of two basic parts: background and
foreground. An object is either a background or foreground object.
In the final stage, Bob removes objects that turned out ugly. This can
be any type of object.

The schema defines an abstract type "shape" which "fgshape" and gbshape"
inherit from. It uses substitutiongroups with head "shape".
<drawBackground> only accepts background shapes, <drawForeground> only
accepts foreground shapes, while <eraseShapes> accepts everything.

The problem is that the painting as defined in painting.xml is not valid
according to the schema, because <eraseShapes> expects an element of
type <shape>, rather than <cloud> or its substitutiongroup <fgshape>.
The error xmlbeans gives is:
Validation error at line: 12: Expected element
'shape@http://prutser.cx/schemas/painting' instead of
'cloud@http://prutser.cx/schemas/painting' here in element
eraseShapes@http://prutser.cx/schemas/painting

In an OO programming language this is not a problem. Cloud extends
fgshape, while fgshape extends shape, so you'll have no problem passing
a cloud instance to eraseShapes.

How does one tackle this problem? Am I using substitutionGroups
incorrectly? I do want to be able to use the names of the concrete
elements, rather than <shape type="cloud" color="white"
cloudtype="cumulunimbus"/> if that's possible.

cheers,
Erik van Zijst


  #2  
Old March 10th, 2006, 04:35 PM
Erik van Zijst
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: substitutiongroups and inheritance

Nevermind, I think I solved it.

I missed the substitution group relation between the abstract types and
the head. I just added substitutionGroup="shape" to fgshape and bgshape
and now it works.
I guess I just missed it as I was relying too much on inheritance. I
probably figured the hierarchy alone was enough for <eraseShape> to
accept <cloud>, as you would expect in OOP, so I didn't bother to apply
them to the abstract types.

Thanks for being my rubber duck ;)
Erik


Erik van Zijst wrote:[color=blue]
> I'm having trouble translating my object inheritance models to xmlschema
> and have illustrated this in the attached example xsd and xml.
>
> In my example I have a canvas for drawing a new painting and the xsd
> contains the instructions for drawing this painting. According to
> instructor Bob, a painting constists of two basic parts: background and
> foreground. An object is either a background or foreground object.
> In the final stage, Bob removes objects that turned out ugly. This can
> be any type of object.
>
> The schema defines an abstract type "shape" which "fgshape" and gbshape"
> inherit from. It uses substitutiongroups with head "shape".
> <drawBackground> only accepts background shapes, <drawForeground> only
> accepts foreground shapes, while <eraseShapes> accepts everything.
>
> The problem is that the painting as defined in painting.xml is not valid
> according to the schema, because <eraseShapes> expects an element of
> type <shape>, rather than <cloud> or its substitutiongroup <fgshape>.
> The error xmlbeans gives is:
> Validation error at line: 12: Expected element
> 'shape@http://prutser.cx/schemas/painting' instead of
> 'cloud@http://prutser.cx/schemas/painting' here in element
> eraseShapes@http://prutser.cx/schemas/painting
>
> In an OO programming language this is not a problem. Cloud extends
> fgshape, while fgshape extends shape, so you'll have no problem passing
> a cloud instance to eraseShapes.
>
> How does one tackle this problem? Am I using substitutionGroups
> incorrectly? I do want to be able to use the names of the concrete
> elements, rather than <shape type="cloud" color="white"
> cloudtype="cumulunimbus"/> if that's possible.
>
> cheers,
> Erik van Zijst
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> <painting xmlns="http://prutser.cx/schemas/painting"
> xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
>
> <drawBackground>
> <cloud color="white" cloudtype="cumulunimbus"/>
> </drawBackground>
> <drawForeground>
> <tree color="green" height="22"/>
> </drawForeground>
> <eraseShapes>
> <cloud color="white" cloudtype="cumulunimbus"/>
> </eraseShapes>
> </painting>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> <xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
> targetNamespace="http://prutser.cx/schemas/painting"
> xmlns="http://prutser.cx/schemas/painting"
> xmlns:tns="http://prutser.cx/schemas/painting"
> xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
>
> <xs:element name="painting">
> <xs:complexType>
> <xs:sequence>
> <xs:element ref="drawBackground"/>
> <xs:element ref="drawForeground"/>
> <xs:element ref="eraseShapes"/>
> </xs:sequence>
> </xs:complexType>
> </xs:element>
>
> <xs:element name="drawBackground">
> <xs:complexType>
> <xs:sequence>
> <xs:element ref="bgshape" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
> </xs:sequence>
> </xs:complexType>
> </xs:element>
>
> <xs:element name="drawForeground">
> <xs:complexType>
> <xs:sequence>
> <xs:element ref="fgshape" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
> </xs:sequence>
> </xs:complexType>
> </xs:element>
>
> <xs:element name="eraseShapes">
> <xs:complexType>
> <xs:sequence>
> <xs:element ref="shape" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
> </xs:sequence>
> </xs:complexType>
> </xs:element>
>
> <xs:element name="shape" type="shape-type" abstract="true"/>
> <xs:complexType name="shape-type" abstract="true">
> <xs:attribute name="color" type="xs:string" use="required"/>
> <xs:attribute name="preferredBrush" type="xs:string" use="optional"/>
> </xs:complexType>
>
> <xs:element name="bgshape" type="bgshape-type" abstract="true"/>
> <xs:complexType name="bgshape-type" abstract="true">
> <xs:complexContent>
> <xs:extension base="shape-type"/>
> </xs:complexContent>
> </xs:complexType>
>
> <xs:element name="cloud" type="cloud-type" substitutionGroup="bgshape"/>
> <xs:complexType name="cloud-type">
> <xs:complexContent>
> <xs:extension base="bgshape-type">
> <xs:attribute name="cloudtype" type="xs:string" use="required"/>
> </xs:extension>
> </xs:complexContent>
> </xs:complexType>
>
> <xs:element name="fgshape" type="fgshape-type" abstract="true"/>
> <xs:complexType name="fgshape-type" abstract="true">
> <xs:complexContent>
> <xs:extension base="shape-type"/>
> </xs:complexContent>
> </xs:complexType>
>
> <xs:element name="tree" type="tree-type" substitutionGroup="fgshape"/>
> <xs:complexType name="tree-type">
> <xs:complexContent>
> <xs:extension base="fgshape-type">
> <xs:attribute name="height" type="xs:int" use="optional"/>
> </xs:extension>
> </xs:complexContent>
> </xs:complexType>
>
> </xs:schema>[/color]
 

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

What is Bytes?

We are a network of experts and professionals in IT and software development that help one another with answers to tough questions and share insights. Get the best answers to your questions from over network members.
Post your question now . . .
It's fast and it's free

Popular Articles