> [Stephan Szabo schreef op 16-06-2004 07:57 -0700][color=blue]
>
> On Wed, 16 Jun 2004, Joolz wrote:
>[color=green]
> > In my db I have a table type_of_action, fields code varchar, name
> > varchar, medical boolean. Two other tables refer to this table,
> > one of them to the medical rows, the other one to the none-medical
> > rows. I would like to make the reference with a view, like this:
> >
> > create table type of action_type (
> > code varchar,
> > name varchar,
> > medical boolean
> > );
> >
> > create view action_type_medical as select * from action_type
> > where medical=true;
> > create view action_type_non_medical as select * from action_type
> > where medical=false;
> >
> > create table general_actions (
> > field1, field2, field_etc,
> > action_type varchar references action_type_non_medical(code)
> > );
> >
> > create table medical_actions (
> > field1, field2, field_etc,
> > action_type varchar references action_type_medical(code)
> > );
> >
> > But pg refuses this, can't create a reference to a view. I can now
> > create a trigger plus function that will do the check, but is
> > there a more elegant way? Thanks![/color]
>
> Not really right now. Note, that to do foreign keys properly you
> need triggers on action_type as well and those triggers need to take
> into account the view conditions to determine what checks to do.[/color]
Thanks for pointing that out. Considering this, it may be a better
idea after all to make two (physically) seperate tables after all.
After all, these are "only" domain tables, and I don't want the
reverse-update trigger to change any of my "real" data.
--
22:40-22:43
Fedora Core release 2 (Tettnang) Linux 2.6.6-1.435
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html 
reference to a view 
