Darin,
I was able to get around this using a trick that someone posted on the
newsgroups. I used export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.2.5 .... I was just
wondering if this is going to cause other problems. I use the graphical
tools locallay on my Winders box to administer the remote instance, so I
can live with not having the tools on the Linux box - I can even debug
remotely, I believe, without having the GUI tools.
The individual also indicated that one should put this in the .profile
for the instance owner.
Any suggestions?
Mairhtin
Darin McBride <dmcbride@naboo.to.org.no.spam.for.me> wrote in
news:BCfqc.488652$Pk3.153071@pd7tw1no:
[color=blue]
> Mairhtin O'Feannag wrote:
>[color=green]
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have a new Linux RH 9.0 server, on which I'm trying to setup DB2.
>> I did the RPM install of IBMJava2-JRE-1.4.1-2.0, which I got from the
>> IBM site. All *APPEARED* to have worked fine. But ... rpm -aq
>> IBMJava2-JRE- 1.4.1-2.0 shows no entry. A simple rpm -aq shows it as
>> the last item in the list. <scratching head>.[/color]
>
> Try:
>
> rpm -qa IBMJava2-JRE
>
> The version portion is not part of the RPM name that you're querying.
>[color=green]
>> Now, when I got to the place I untarred DB2 v8.1 (/local4/db281/009
>> _ESE_LNX_32_NLV) and type ./db2setup, what I get is :
>>
>>
>> /local4/db281/009_ESE_LNX_32_NLV/db2/linux/install/db2jinst: line
>> 130: 3210 Segmentation fault $JAVA_PATH/$JAVA_INTERPRETER
>> $JAVA_OPTIONS - cp $JAVA_CLASSPATH $DB2SetupRun "$@"
>> 2>/tmp/db2setup.err.running
>>
>>
>> and I have no idea what this means. The 130th line of that script is
>> a "fi" statement. ????????[/color]
>
> It means a couple things:
>
> 1. The java that db2setup uses is still the java that's on the CD
> image, not the one that's installed locally.
>
> 2. RH 9 is not, nor will be, validated as an "approved and supported"
> platform with which to run DB2. Please see the linux validation site:
>
http://www.ibm.com/db2/linux/validate.
>
> Unofficially, it means that you need the same workaround as RHEL3
> needs, which I believe is documented on the validation site, but I do
> want to stress that RH9 is still not officially supported, even if you
> get the install working.
>[/color]