Alan Little wrote:
Example:
$x = 'a';
extract($x);
@extract($x);
Great!
I like this idea. There are a number of things like this that a person
might come across in someone else's code, for example, that are difficult
to look up in the docs without knowing what they are.
Yes, that's why I think what we call @ is important. If you
were searching for @ on Google, what would you call it?
Here's some results:
"at-sign"
316 000 hits
commercial at"
97 500 hits
"commercial at sign"
1 730 hits
'Commercial at sign', though not as common, covers those
three possibilities, but it does sound a bit stilted,
doesn't it? The AUE FAQ says it's the longest name for @.
http://www.alt-usage-english.org/excerpts/fxnameso.html
The Jargon File 4.4.7 says:
| @
| Common: at sign; at; strudel. Rare: each; vortex; whorl;
| [whirlpool]; cyclone; snail; ape; cat; rose; cabbage;
| <commercial at>.
http://catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/A/ASCII.html
And if you're really interested, /A Natural History of the @
Sign/:
http://www.herodios.com/herron_tc/atsign.html
--
Jock