Hi,

some developers seem to have a good sense of humor. The following
was found after (stupid enough) restoring a DB created with FP9a on a
FP8 test-system (DIAGLEVEL=4):

2006-03-17-13.13.47.909513+060 I54072G437 LEVEL: Info
PID : 22929 TID : 1024 PROC : db2agent (TEST)
INSTANCE: db2inst1 NODE : 000 DB : TEST
APPHDL : 0-300 APPID: XXXXXXXX.XXXX.XXXXXXXXXXXX
FUNCTION: DB2 UDB, access plan manager, sqlra_compile_var, probe:20
RETCODE : ZRC=0x80310004=-2144272380=SQLNN_E_NFOUND
"did not find specified thing in whatever"

Not too bad. It finally led me to the initial mistake AND gave me a
refreshing laugh. Thank you guys! ;-)

tcb,

Norbert

Norbert Munkel wrote:[color=blue]
> Hi,
>
> some developers seem to have a good sense of humor. The following
> was found after (stupid enough) restoring a DB created with FP9a on a
> FP8 test-system (DIAGLEVEL=4):
>
> 2006-03-17-13.13.47.909513+060 I54072G437 LEVEL: Info
> PID : 22929 TID : 1024 PROC : db2agent (TEST)
> INSTANCE: db2inst1 NODE : 000 DB : TEST
> APPHDL : 0-300 APPID: XXXXXXXX.XXXX.XXXXXXXXXXXX
> FUNCTION: DB2 UDB, access plan manager, sqlra_compile_var, probe:20
> RETCODE : ZRC=0x80310004=-2144272380=SQLNN_E_NFOUND
> "did not find specified thing in whatever"
>
> Not too bad. It finally led me to the initial mistake AND gave me a
> refreshing laugh. Thank you guys! ;-)[/color]
There you go.. And some people think we should clean these up and be
"more professional" *chuckle*

Presumable the SQLCODE -204 that goes with it filled in the blanks?

Cheers
Serge
--
Serge Rielau
DB2 Solutions Development
IBM Toronto Lab

Hi Serge,

Serge Rielau wrote:
[color=blue][color=green]
>> "did not find specified thing in whatever"
>>
>> Not too bad. It finally led me to the initial mistake AND gave me a
>> refreshing laugh. Thank you guys! ;-)[/color]
>
> There you go.. And some people think we should clean these up and be
> "more professional" *chuckle*
>
> Presumable the SQLCODE -204 that goes with it filled in the blanks?[/color]

It did. And there was more _really_ usefull stuff in the db2diag.log as
well. But this particular one was just funny (but didn't came alone, as
you have mentioned)! ;-)

Regards,

Norbert

Norbert Munkel wrote:[color=blue]
> Hi,
>
> some developers seem to have a good sense of humor. The following
> was found after (stupid enough) restoring a DB created with FP9a on a
> FP8 test-system (DIAGLEVEL=4):
>
> 2006-03-17-13.13.47.909513+060 I54072G437 LEVEL: Info
> PID : 22929 TID : 1024 PROC : db2agent (TEST)
> INSTANCE: db2inst1 NODE : 000 DB : TEST
> APPHDL : 0-300 APPID: XXXXXXXX.XXXX.XXXXXXXXXXXX
> FUNCTION: DB2 UDB, access plan manager, sqlra_compile_var, probe:20
> RETCODE : ZRC=0x80310004=-2144272380=SQLNN_E_NFOUND
> "did not find specified thing in whatever"
>
> Not too bad. It finally led me to the initial mistake AND gave me a
> refreshing laugh. Thank you guys! ;-)[/color]

My favorite was the ZRC=0xDEADBEEF. That was back in V5 days, but it
always made me chuckle. :-)